|
Post by MsRSV on Nov 20, 2013 21:30:26 GMT -5
That's why I said I would take my chances You are getting off way too easy. My violation of copyright was met with much more gnashing of teeth.
|
|
|
Post by coloradokidd on Nov 20, 2013 22:04:26 GMT -5
Aside from all the dates that obviously vary from year to year, and some procedural stuff related to submitting bids to host, the only changes I notice in the Determination of Championship Participation section of this year's Pre-Championships manual are: - The addition of the American Athletic Conference to the list of automatic bids - The adjustments to the base RPI formula have changed to the following: In the 2012 manual, the penalty was applied for playing the majority of matches against / losing to teams ranked 150 and above in the RPI (or non-DI teams). This "bonus" section seems like it would really help the 'top' B1G teams since a number of conference teams they won against were ranked in the "Top 25".
|
|
|
Post by jets on Dec 1, 2013 18:54:28 GMT -5
So is Pablo Ranking and AVCA Poll used in addition to RPI or was this just a cruel joke.
|
|
|
Post by FreeBall on Dec 1, 2013 18:58:03 GMT -5
I don't know if it was a cruel joke, but I take most of what was posted from the interview with a healthy dose of skepticism.
|
|
|
Post by baywatcher on Dec 1, 2013 19:32:42 GMT -5
Pablo was supposedly referred to last year or the year before, no mention of "additional resources" this year. Finding the info from the NCAA is very frustrating; hope the SID's at the relevant schools are wired in better than the general public.
|
|
|
Post by OverAndUnder on Dec 1, 2013 20:20:49 GMT -5
Can I get a bump as well? Does anyone know what the selection criteria would be for this year? Is it the same as last year? I've prepared all the NCAA at-large candidate resume's but need to make sure what the committee is looking for. They're looking for two things: 1) Cheap 2) Easy It's not like this is a sport played by penis-having humans or followed by rabid money-spending humans. You have to be both of those to get serious attention from the NCAA pro-am league.
|
|