|
Post by vbman100 on Apr 26, 2014 21:16:39 GMT -5
I'm just saying that when I watch the Rosens and Kreklows, I get the creeps. There is a dynamic between them, their asst. coaches and players that just seems strange. But you have no problem with a coach dating or marrying an ex-player? I was waiting for someone to make this comment. Especially since PSU volley made the original statement.
|
|
|
Post by azvb on Apr 26, 2014 22:36:45 GMT -5
Okay, new thread: Coaches who have married ex-players. Seriously, this would be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by jcvball22 on Apr 27, 2014 0:44:57 GMT -5
Okay, new thread: Coaches who have married ex-players. Seriously, this would be interesting. And it would be a pretty long list...
|
|
|
Post by sevb on Apr 27, 2014 6:15:19 GMT -5
Okay, new thread: Coaches who have married ex-players. Seriously, this would be interesting. And it would be a pretty long list... With some very notable names.... That being said... It would turn south fairly quickly....
|
|
|
Post by Phaedrus on Apr 27, 2014 6:22:25 GMT -5
And it would be a pretty long list... With some very notable names.... That being said... It would turn south fairly quickly.... It seems we had the same imaginary conversation in our heads Sevb.
|
|
|
Post by vbc1 on Apr 27, 2014 8:08:02 GMT -5
With some very notable names.... That being said... It would turn south fairly quickly.... It seems we had the same imaginary conversation in our heads Sevb. I would agree that it would be an interesting topic for sure. And yes, that list might be a bit longer, and include more top names than people think. But, I also agree that it would turn into a TMZ type thread, and turn south in a hurry. Better left to the imagination than to start calling out people on here.
|
|
|
Post by azvb on Apr 27, 2014 10:09:42 GMT -5
It seems we had the same imaginary conversation in our heads Sevb. I would agree that it would be an interesting topic for sure. And yes, that list might be a bit longer, and include more top names than people think. But, I also agree that it would turn into a TMZ type thread, and turn south in a hurry. Better left to the imagination than to start calling out people on here. Really? I can only come up with two names. Someone pm me with others - the reality show junkie in me wants to know.
|
|
|
Post by newenglander on Apr 27, 2014 10:47:23 GMT -5
Another reason why I believe incoming scholarships should be guaranteed for two years. Scholarships should be canceled by a set date or automatically renewed. I'm not in favor of 2 or 4 years guaranteed. Nothing in life is guaranteed. I'm sure many college coaches would be outraged that you don't feel that they should get multi-year contracts... or do you mean "just for the players"
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Apr 27, 2014 13:05:50 GMT -5
I'm not in favor of 2 or 4 years guaranteed. Nothing in life is guaranteed. I'm sure many college coaches would be outraged that you don't feel that they should get multi-year contracts... or do you mean "just for the players" The NCAA already allows four-year guarantees for some players, if schools choose, and can afford, to do it. Not a stretch to extend that to a two-year guarantee for all incoming (true frosh) scholarship players. It would be interesting to see a study showing what percentage of players who had their scholarships cancelled following their freshmen season managed to secure a scholarship for their following season.
|
|
|
Post by gotball on Apr 28, 2014 1:14:36 GMT -5
Question for the coaches out there. What is the advantage for SJSU to try and make the players sign a "Relinquishment of Aid" form that says you voluntarily quit verses just releasing them. Most refused to sign it since she wasn't the one quiting, the school quit on her. Coach said she gave the girls the wrong form to sign by mistake, and now we have a full release document. Easy mistake or was this part of the plan? Is it an advantage to the school to have players voluntarily quit verses releasing them and the APR, FGR, or GSR? Seems a little fishy to me.
|
|
|
Post by Mocha on Apr 28, 2014 2:35:48 GMT -5
Remember, this is the second time she's done this. She's had practice, there are no mistakes.
BTW, signing voluntary withdrawal gives up right to appeal.
|
|
|
Post by vbman100 on Apr 28, 2014 7:07:52 GMT -5
It seems we had the same imaginary conversation in our heads Sevb. I would agree that it would be an interesting topic for sure. And yes, that list might be a bit longer, and include more top names than people think. But, I also agree that it would turn into a TMZ type thread, and turn south in a hurry. Better left to the imagination than to start calling out people on here. Yes, no calling out people on here please. OK, back to the discussion about the Shepardsons.
|
|
|
Post by stand on Apr 28, 2014 7:46:30 GMT -5
I know I'm just stating the obvious, but if the Shepardsons have done this before, then they are just implementing the plan that SJSU wanted and hired them for. It really isn't any use calling out the coaches when they are just doing what the administration wants, which is getting rid of the underperforming student-employee-athletes and hiring new ones. This is the formula for success: clean slate, hired guns, winning record, bonus.
If the NCAA fails to block the releases on appeal, it is just more evidence of how hypocritical their whole "student-athlete" model really is. If the NCAA won't protect students from release without cause, you have to expect the students to start forming unions and fighting for their rights. The whole house of cards is going to come tumbling down quickly.
|
|
|
Post by amjohnstonde on Apr 28, 2014 9:01:51 GMT -5
Union--we don't need no stinking union!
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Apr 28, 2014 12:50:13 GMT -5
Remember, this is the second time she's done this. She's had practice, there are no mistakes. BTW, signing voluntary withdrawal gives up right to appeal. And if they don't, they'd have to appeal to get their releases, right?
|
|