Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2014 11:51:27 GMT -5
That's probably the top 2 unless I'm forgetting someone. Alexa Smith, Jordyn Poulter, how good is Belen Castillo? My guess is: 1. Hodson 2. Foeckhe 3. Bedart-Ghani Switch 1 and 2.
|
|
|
Post by MTC on Sept 3, 2014 12:52:07 GMT -5
It looks like the power shift to the Big Ten continues.
|
|
|
Post by MTC on Sept 3, 2014 12:58:46 GMT -5
MTC - Are you allowed to put which number a specific recruit is on here? I just joined PrepVB and I'm not clear on how much JT allows to be shared on VT, but I thought copy/pasting like that was not allowed. I could be wrong, too. Anyway, on topic, my prediction is that Madison Duello (OH) is the most highly ranked 2015 recruit for Wisconsin, based on JT's comments about her in a State Journal article on Wisconsin recruits: “My favorite is Duello because she is a true six-rotation player,” Tawa said. “She is proficient in the back row. She has an electric arm on the left and I really think she has a tremendously high ceiling. I think she’ll be an All-Big Ten performer, possibly as early as her sophomore year.” Read more: host.madison.com/sports/college/volleyball/badgers-volleyball-top-notch-recruits-already-committing-for/article_2ddff687-8eee-5e56-b57d-f9ba1d981a5c.html#ixzz3CGWAxtYDTionna Williams (MB) is probably also top 20, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Brooke Morgan (MB) in the top 50. That leaves Julia Saunders (RS) and Hannah Juley (S). I think Juley's ranking will probably suffer a bit just because she didn't play club this spring, choosing instead (in consultation with Sheffield, I heard) to continue rehabbing her ankle following surgery rather than rushing back in. And now that the cat's out of the bag, I'm thrilled to read more about Amber MacDonald. She seems like exactly the sort of player Sheff and Dilly want in the back row. Actually yes. JT doesn't want the listing of senior aces used but accepts that his lists are reputable and may be referred to for a single player. I try to give prepvolleyball credit when I use their information. It is such a valuable resource I would encourage everyone to subscribe to it so we could all be more knowledgeable.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Sept 3, 2014 13:10:18 GMT -5
MTC - Are you allowed to put which number a specific recruit is on here? I just joined PrepVB and I'm not clear on how much JT allows to be shared on VT, but I thought copy/pasting like that was not allowed. I could be wrong, too. Anyway, on topic, my prediction is that Madison Duello (OH) is the most highly ranked 2015 recruit for Wisconsin, based on JT's comments about her in a State Journal article on Wisconsin recruits: “My favorite is Duello because she is a true six-rotation player,” Tawa said. “She is proficient in the back row. She has an electric arm on the left and I really think she has a tremendously high ceiling. I think she’ll be an All-Big Ten performer, possibly as early as her sophomore year.” Read more: host.madison.com/sports/college/volleyball/badgers-volleyball-top-notch-recruits-already-committing-for/article_2ddff687-8eee-5e56-b57d-f9ba1d981a5c.html#ixzz3CGWAxtYDTionna Williams (MB) is probably also top 20, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Brooke Morgan (MB) in the top 50. That leaves Julia Saunders (RS) and Hannah Juley (S). I think Juley's ranking will probably suffer a bit just because she didn't play club this spring, choosing instead (in consultation with Sheffield, I heard) to continue rehabbing her ankle following surgery rather than rushing back in. And now that the cat's out of the bag, I'm thrilled to read more about Amber MacDonald. She seems like exactly the sort of player Sheff and Dilly want in the back row. Actually yes. JT doesn't want the listing of senior aces used but accepts that his lists are reputable and may be referred to for a single player. I try to give prepvolleyball credit when I use their information. It is such a valuable resource I would encourage everyone to subscribe to it so we could all be more knowledgeable. That's cool, thanks for responding. Like I said, I'm trying to learn the ropes.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 3, 2014 13:22:26 GMT -5
90. Indiana 89. Uncommited 88. Alabama 87. Colorado 86. Minnesota 85. Alabama 84. UNC 83. Morehead St. 82. Wake Forest 81. Louisville
|
|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Sept 3, 2014 13:25:05 GMT -5
90. Indiana 89. Uncommited (I thought Georgia for some reason?) 88. Alabama 87. Colorado 86. Minnesota 85. Alabama 84. UNC 83. Morehead St. 82. Wake Forest 81. Louisville Ah, you beat me to it. I started a new thread because I figured this one was for #s 100-91 only. Should we change the name on this thread?
|
|
|
Post by hennosy on Sept 3, 2014 13:29:23 GMT -5
It looks like the power shift to the Big Ten continues. What's the over/under on future B1G players named in the top 100?
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Sept 3, 2014 13:51:40 GMT -5
Excited to see where hawaii recruits get placed! Who do they have coming in. I know Granato (5'11 OH) and Castello (6'3 OH). Is that all? Just those two. I think Castillo will be a wee bit higher but both should be top 50 recruits
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 3, 2014 15:05:50 GMT -5
It looks like the power shift to the Big Ten continues. Well not that I disagree, persay, on this statement, but the PAC-12 isn't reloading a lot next year. The big10 is losing more impact players, thus they should be getting more recruits this upcoming season. Recruiting goes in cycles. Looking at one year doesn't say much, you have to look at it in 3-4 year spans. That said, the big 10 has out recruited every other conference in the last cycle or two (based on prep ranking), which is a large reflection of the prep rankings of the players in the Midwest region, regardless of which schools they choose to go to.
|
|
|
Post by wishinwestcoastvb on Sept 3, 2014 15:14:55 GMT -5
I hope Maloney is ranked higher than Sauer. Ron Kordes tends to favorite Molly because she is going to play for his daughter. Kenzie is way better and hope Tawa sees this too.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 3, 2014 15:38:54 GMT -5
It looks like the power shift to the Big Ten continues. Well not that I disagree, persay, on this statement, but the PAC-12 isn't reloading a lot next year. The big10 is losing more impact players, thus they should be getting more recruits this upcoming season. Recruiting goes in cycles. Looking at one year doesn't say much, you have to look at it in 3-4 year spans. That said, the big 10 has out recruited every other conference in the last cycle or two (based on prep ranking), which is a large reflection of the prep rankings of the players in the Midwest region, regardless of which schools they choose to go to. I don't think this is right. UW and Stanford aren't loading up, but the rest of the West is doing well. I see the conference getting around 25, which would be up from last year, and we'll have more than the B1G this year. Arizona (4). ASU (1), Cal (4-5), CU (1), UO (5, maybe 4 if I'm being a homer), OSU (0?), Stan (1), UCLA (3), USC (3), UT (1), UW (1), WSU (2-3)
|
|
|
Post by chisovnik on Sept 3, 2014 16:42:12 GMT -5
My guess is: 1. Hodson 2. Foeckhe 3. Bedart-Ghani Switch 1 and 2. No.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2014 16:57:03 GMT -5
Hodson isn't better than/doesn't have more potential than Foecke. You were wrong about Frantti and you're wrong about this. Sorry buddy.
|
|
|
Post by MTC on Sept 3, 2014 17:26:48 GMT -5
Well not that I disagree, persay, on this statement, but the PAC-12 isn't reloading a lot next year. The big10 is losing more impact players, thus they should be getting more recruits this upcoming season. Recruiting goes in cycles. Looking at one year doesn't say much, you have to look at it in 3-4 year spans. That said, the big 10 has out recruited every other conference in the last cycle or two (based on prep ranking), which is a large reflection of the prep rankings of the players in the Midwest region, regardless of which schools they choose to go to. I don't think this is right. UW and Stanford aren't loading up, but the rest of the West is doing well. I see the conference getting around 25, which would be up from last year, and we'll have more than the B1G this year. Arizona (4). ASU (1), Cal (4-5), CU (1), UO (5, maybe 4 if I'm being a homer), OSU (0?), Stan (1), UCLA (3), USC (3), UT (1), UW (1), WSU (2-3) I didn't say the B1G was outdoing the PAC. I just think the trend is more elite players are going to the B1G than ever before. Let's wait for the full list to come out and compare.
|
|
|
Post by chisovnik on Sept 3, 2014 18:05:42 GMT -5
Hodson isn't better than/doesn't have more potential than Foecke. You were wrong about Frantti and you're wrong about this. Sorry buddy. Says the guy who said the only shot Robinson had at playing for the NT was as a libero?
|
|