|
Post by redbeard2008 on Oct 2, 2014 20:11:20 GMT -5
posting this pic is probably unnecessary. it's somewhat suggestive. Suggestive of what?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 21:31:28 GMT -5
Any staff with Salima Rockwell on it. She makes up for the ugliness of Russ Rose and the rest of the staff.
|
|
|
Post by beb12345 on Oct 3, 2014 0:40:01 GMT -5
There is a club in Florida that has two very attractive female coaches. The coaches may not know this but they are referred to as the "spandex twins". UT Chattanooga had two BEAUTIFUL assistant coaches last year. One of them has left coaching. Did she become a "trophy" ex-coach wife??
|
|
|
Post by beb12345 on Oct 3, 2014 0:48:17 GMT -5
Any staff with Salima Rockwell on it. She makes up for the ugliness of Russ Rose and the rest of the staff. Sure glad this thread hasn't turned personal and shallow.
|
|
|
Post by pancake83 on Oct 3, 2014 9:02:06 GMT -5
Official staff pictures - *most anyone* can look good -
Now, how you actually look in person - that's a whole separate thread.
But I digress, who has both brains and beauty??
It's funny to hear club moms to openly 'drool' over Hambly or Sealy - but if a guy coach mentions that a female coach is attractive (or even dare say 'hot' or even worse, 'sexy') that he gets chastised for saying such misogynistic things about a woman!!!
|
|
BoilerOn
Freshman
Boiler Up and Fight On!!
Posts: 71
|
Post by BoilerOn on Oct 3, 2014 9:33:06 GMT -5
|
|
bp19
Junior High
Posts: 1
|
Post by bp19 on Oct 3, 2014 11:01:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ence on Oct 3, 2014 12:51:28 GMT -5
Fg = GM1M2/r^2 So clearly, the most attractive coaching staff must be the one that has the most mass. It depends on which way they are charged. Freakin' EEs. They think every inverse square law they see must be about what they're working on ... jeez.
|
|
|
Post by gulo2 on Oct 3, 2014 15:34:07 GMT -5
^^^ This mass matter is hard to figure. An engineer explained to me that when gravity is in play he views tight well positioned mass as most desirable (less is more), and his formula differs wildly from Mike’s. Very confusing.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Oct 3, 2014 16:23:31 GMT -5
^^^ This mass matter is hard to figure. An engineer explained to me that when gravity is in play he views tight well positioned mass as most desirable (less is more), and his formula differs wildly from Mike’s. Very confusing. "My" formula actually came from a guy named Newton. Einstein replaced it with something more General, but for most purposes Newton's formula is still useful. But there have always been problems with trying to use Newton's law of gravity on three bodies, and since most coaching staffs do have at least three bodies, perhaps that might be an issue. Even in literature and film, people have studied the three body attraction problem in great detail. Perhaps your engineer friend is thinking of the r^2 term. The attraction of a body gets stronger as you snuggle up close to it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 4, 2014 9:42:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by pancake83 on Oct 6, 2014 12:09:45 GMT -5
that's the first I've seen a baby in a person's head shot for a university - nice add and a cute kiddo!
|
|
|
Post by kahusancali on Oct 6, 2014 13:34:33 GMT -5
this thread seem very popular:) a week later.
|
|
|
Post by rockhopper on Oct 6, 2014 14:32:10 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2014 21:44:36 GMT -5
Their second nomination. I think we're on to something here. I think I still prefer my original suggestion, however the 2013 Chattanooga staff might be #1.
|
|