|
Post by coloradokidd on Nov 21, 2014 10:53:21 GMT -5
If they're on, nebraska. When all things are going right, nebraska is scary good. But they're wildly inconsistent OTOH, if I'm U-dub I want Nebraska real bad. A score needs to be settled ... That would be fun for the Huskers, since they have already played most of the others. Or another match with Stanford since they met during the Huskers first week of school.
|
|
nik12
Sophomore
Posts: 163
|
Post by nik12 on Nov 21, 2014 10:55:02 GMT -5
If they're on, nebraska. When all things are going right, nebraska is scary good. But they're wildly inconsistent OTOH, if I'm U-dub I want Nebraska real bad. A score needs to be settled ... Wouldn't think Washington gives a sh*t since they won that game and sent Nebraska home. Winners talk, losers walk, and all that. Maybe Nebraska wants some payback, but what the heck was this all about anyway?
|
|
|
Post by coloradokidd on Nov 21, 2014 11:34:39 GMT -5
PSU has had a light schedule through the month of November; 11/07/14 vs. Rutgers * University Park, Pa. W, 3-0 11/08/14 vs. Maryland * University Park, Pa. W, 3-0 11/12/14 vs. Iowa * University Park, Pa. W, 3-0 11/15/14 vs. Minnesota * University Park, Pa. W, 3-0 11/19/14 at Michigan * Ann Arbor, Mich. W, 3-0 11/22/14 at Maryland * College Park, Md. 7:00 p.m. ET 11/26/14 at Northwestern * Evanston, Ill. 8:00 p.m. ET 11/29/14 vs. Nebraska * TV University Park, Pa. 8:30 p.m. ET I don't know if this is good or bad in getting ready for the NCAA's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2014 12:13:39 GMT -5
OTOH, if I'm U-dub I want Nebraska real bad. A score needs to be settled ... Wouldn't think Washington gives a sh*t since they won that game and sent Nebraska home. Winners talk, losers walk, and all that. Maybe Nebraska wants some payback, but what the heck was this all about anyway? According to Cook, the ball was out
|
|
|
Post by vbprisoner on Nov 21, 2014 12:30:05 GMT -5
If you are a seeded team I would not want these teams in my sub-regional or regional:
1. Purdue - if on they are physical and can beat a lot of the seeded teams 2. Colorado - they are a dangerous team, that if peaking could knock out quality teams
|
|
nik12
Sophomore
Posts: 163
|
Post by nik12 on Nov 21, 2014 13:27:08 GMT -5
If you are a seeded team I would not want these teams in my sub-regional or regional: 1. Purdue - if on they are physical and can beat a lot of the seeded teams 2. Colorado - they are a dangerous team, that if peaking could knock out quality teams Agreed on both counts. Purdue especially. Purdue has several ladies that can really bang away. If on and healthy, as you mention, they will be a very tough out.
|
|
|
Post by vbbetterthanbb on Nov 21, 2014 13:47:43 GMT -5
If you are a seeded team I would not want these teams in my sub-regional or regional: 1. Purdue - if on they are physical and can beat a lot of the seeded teams 2. Colorado - they are a dangerous team, that if peaking could knock out quality teams Agreed on both counts. Purdue especially. Purdue has several ladies that can really bang away. If on and healthy, as you mention, they will be a very tough out. When I watched the Purdue-PSU match, there were plenty of moments I thought Purdue was going to win. Hopefully Purdue will get in to make NCAA more exciting.
|
|
|
Post by oldman on Nov 21, 2014 14:21:23 GMT -5
All of the above
|
|
|
Post by NebraskaVBfan93 on Nov 21, 2014 15:11:24 GMT -5
OTOH, if I'm U-dub I want Nebraska real bad. A score needs to be settled ... Wouldn't think Washington gives a sh*t since they won that game and sent Nebraska home. Winners talk, losers walk, and all that. Maybe Nebraska wants some payback, but what the heck was this all about anyway? FYI... Nebraska won the most recent meeting between the schools.
|
|
|
Post by Wiswell on Nov 21, 2014 15:33:29 GMT -5
Hmm, if we interpret the original post a different way, aren't we just saying who is likely to be the National Champion?
|
|
|
Post by Pirate VB Fan on Nov 21, 2014 19:09:34 GMT -5
Washington. I think they will bounce back from their really bad weekend and get back on track. Still a very good team, and, if you are a seeded team, you would be playing all these other teams at a neutral site. With Washington, you would be on their home floor. This is a good point, although that didn't go so well, even with 10,000 people cheering for them last year. Well, technically not UW's home floor last year... Anyway, I don't want to see Stanford until the finals as I think they should always set it up so that the top two teams in either of the Power Conferences (PAC-12 and B1G) should not be aligned to meet before then. I certainly don't want Stanford in the Regional Final at UW. That would be a travesty. On the other hand, as a UW fan I have NO PROBLEM with seeing UNC in the Seattle regional final. I think that would be great. Aside from the fact I don't think they deserve anywhere near that high a seed, of course.
|
|
|
Post by macroman on Nov 22, 2014 15:45:54 GMT -5
We should ask, who would you not want to see in the tournament that isn't ranked in the top 5, 10 etc. Obviously the poll choices are all very tough. And where is Illinois in your poll?
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Nov 22, 2014 20:56:44 GMT -5
Wouldn't think Washington gives a sh*t since they won that game and sent Nebraska home. Winners talk, losers walk, and all that. Maybe Nebraska wants some payback, but what the heck was this all about anyway? FYI... Nebraska won the most recent meeting between the schools. Nebraska got more than their payback. That was the first Nebraska/UW meeting in quite a while that was not epic. The two Nebraska/UW matches in Seattle are still probably two of the best matches I've ever seen. The most recent one in Nebraska was a Husker rout.
|
|
|
Post by akbar on Nov 23, 2014 7:15:36 GMT -5
If you are a seeded team I would not want these teams in my sub-regional or regional: 1. Purdue - if on they are physical and can beat a lot of the seeded teams 2. Colorado - they are a dangerous team, that if peaking could knock out quality teams Agreed on both counts. Purdue especially. Purdue has several ladies that can really bang away. If on and healthy, as you mention, they will be a very tough out. Well Purdue is just plain off their game right now and Colorado seems to be a completely different team when they have to travel. Both have potential to do damage but I would roll my chances if they were on my side of the bracket. Illinois? Geez, They have as much chance in beating themselves as they do getting to final 8.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Nov 23, 2014 11:17:42 GMT -5
BYU has to be the most frightening non-seeded team. And UCLA could now easily not get a seed as well. Both those teams have scorers you kinda just hope have off nights.
Those are the correct answers to "who do you not want in your subregional"
|
|