Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 29, 2015 23:14:12 GMT -5
Was there any improvement?
Clemson Notre Dame Baylor TCU West Virgina Washington Charlotte
|
|
|
Post by Mocha on Aug 29, 2015 23:22:01 GMT -5
Buffalo UT Martin
|
|
|
Post by s0uthie on Aug 29, 2015 23:26:50 GMT -5
Bookmark for two years from now.
|
|
|
Post by bucky415 on Aug 29, 2015 23:32:33 GMT -5
Shout out to Jackie Simpson at George Mason. 2-1 on the weekend, falling to American but beating Howard and Georgetown.
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on Aug 29, 2015 23:33:56 GMT -5
Technically BYU
|
|
|
Post by bosch on Aug 30, 2015 1:26:30 GMT -5
UC Irvine Cal St Fullerton Pepperdine Weber St Montana Montana St
|
|
|
Post by vbnerd on Aug 30, 2015 1:27:19 GMT -5
The Citadel won a match!
|
|
|
Post by HappyVolley on Aug 30, 2015 1:34:00 GMT -5
Leave The Citadel alone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2015 2:05:24 GMT -5
From what I saw these teams looked improved: TCU, UCI, Fullerton vs Alabama
These teams ldid not: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Baylor and Clemson. Clemson played poor.
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Aug 30, 2015 2:29:51 GMT -5
From what I saw these teams looked improved: TCU, UCI, Fullerton vs Alabama These teams ldid not: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Baylor and Clemson. Clemson played poor. Not much coaching can improve notre dames roster. Give him a couple years with recruiting and developing, they'll be good.
|
|
|
Post by fightingminime on Aug 30, 2015 6:45:06 GMT -5
From what I saw these teams looked improved: TCU, UCI, Fullerton vs Alabama These teams ldid not: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Baylor and Clemson. Clemson played poor. And what leads you to believe Clemson played poor ... The scores? Did you actually watch them play? Their offense was faster and defense was better than I have seen recently ... There's just no Mo Simmons to bail them out. They started 4 freshman, a sophomore, a junior, and a transfer Libero. And their best projected outside was injured during warm-ups of the first match. Had to be subbed out before a point was played. It's going to take a little time for them to reap the benefits of the new coaching, but they will be fine.
|
|
|
Post by JustInCase on Aug 30, 2015 8:28:03 GMT -5
From what I saw these teams looked improved: TCU, UCI, Fullerton vs Alabama These teams ldid not: Notre Dame, West Virginia, Baylor and Clemson. Clemson played poor. And what leads you to believe Clemson played poor ... The scores? Did you actually watch them play? Their offense was faster and defense was better than I have seen recently ... There's just no Mo Simmons to bail them out. They started 4 freshman, a sophomore, a junior, and a transfer Libero. And their best projected outside was injured during warm-ups of the first match. Had to be subbed out before a point was played. It's going to take a little time for them to reap the benefits of the new coaching, but they will be fine. I watched. Yes, they played poorly. I don't think anyone said that it was a result of a new coach and/or that they wouldn't be better in the future. There may be a lot of reasons they played poorly (youth, need better recruits, etc.), but that wasn't the point. Hopefully they will get better, but they played poorly this weekend.
|
|
|
Post by wmiv1895 on Aug 30, 2015 9:02:00 GMT -5
Missisippi State went 2-1. Like Clemson, it's going to take time to get it to the level they want. Good luck to both former Southland rivals.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2015 17:49:40 GMT -5
Any power 5 school losing to non power 5 schools is considered a poor performance. Especially poor if the teams are small programs like App State and Wilmington. So yes Clemson losing to them is poor. Higher expectations at that level. Miss State getting swept by a very weak Southern Utah at home. Is very poor. The Southland coaches will be judged on a whole different level now. Not hating just being honest.
|
|
|
Post by fightingminime on Aug 30, 2015 18:17:58 GMT -5
And what leads you to believe Clemson played poor ... The scores? Did you actually watch them play? Their offense was faster and defense was better than I have seen recently ... There's just no Mo Simmons to bail them out. They started 4 freshman, a sophomore, a junior, and a transfer Libero. And their best projected outside was injured during warm-ups of the first match. Had to be subbed out before a point was played. It's going to take a little time for them to reap the benefits of the new coaching, but they will be fine. I watched. Yes, they played poorly. I don't think anyone said that it was a result of a new coach and/or that they wouldn't be better in the future. There may be a lot of reasons they played poorly (youth, need better recruits, etc.), but that wasn't the point. Hopefully they will get better, but they played poorly this weekend. We should have high-fives at the game then. I thought Wilmington was better than expected. The App State loss was bad.
|
|