|
Post by Disc808 on Sept 2, 2015 13:11:04 GMT -5
Stanford- 3 in the top 15 Is this class considered better than 2012 Rabking wise? No stanford had all 5 in the top 15, with 4 in the top ten. But maybe potential wise it will be. I was talking potential wise. And ranking wise 2012 was better but 2016 brings in different positions
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 2, 2015 13:14:34 GMT -5
my top 10 prediction
1. USC 2. Stanford 3. Stanford 4. Texas 5. Wisconsin 6. Oregon 7. North Carolina 8. Florida 9. Nebraska 10. Kentucky
|
|
|
Post by Sbilo on Sept 2, 2015 13:31:23 GMT -5
Mine:
1. Stanford* 2. USC 3. Stanford 4. Wisconsin 5. Texas 6. Oregon 7. Florida 8. North Carolina 9. Kentucky 10. Nebraska
*Plummer (Since there are 2 Cardinal recruits)
|
|
|
Post by bigfan2 on Sept 2, 2015 13:46:43 GMT -5
Mine: 1. Stanford* 2. USC 3. Stanford 4. Wisconsin 5. Texas 6. Oregon 7. Florida 8. North Carolina 9. Kentucky 10. Nebraska *Plummer (Since there are 2 Cardinal recruits)
|
|
|
Post by bigfan2 on Sept 2, 2015 13:48:41 GMT -5
1. Stanford - Fitzmorris 2. Stanford - Plummer 3. USC 4. Texas 5. Wisconsin
|
|
|
Post by John Tawa-VolleyballMag.com on Sept 2, 2015 13:51:47 GMT -5
my top 10 prediction 1. USC 2. Stanford 3. Stanford 4. Texas 5. Wisconsin 6. Oregon 7. North Carolina 8. Florida 9. Nebraska 10. Kentucky This person has 7 out of the 10 in the exact spots...
|
|
|
Post by nakedcrayon on Sept 2, 2015 14:20:14 GMT -5
JT is starting up a game best suited for the Price is Right...
C'mon down...
1. USC 2. Stanford 3. Stanford 4. Texas 5. North Carolina 6. Wisconsin 7. Oregon 8. Florida 9. Nebraska 10. Kentucky
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 2, 2015 14:26:32 GMT -5
Stanford- 3 in the top 15 Is this class considered better than 2012 better? hard to say...there are some position disparities. For example in 2016 they are bringing in a top OPP and L, they didn't recruit those positions in 2012. But can Gray be an equal or better setter than Bugg? probably, will Fitzmorris be a better MB than Inky? probably not, will the Keefe's be a better OH tandem than Burgess and Howard? maybe, in some aspects of the game. ....at the end of the day, Stanford is reloading, who cares?
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 2, 2015 14:26:59 GMT -5
my top 10 prediction 1. USC 2. Stanford 3. Stanford 4. Texas 5. Wisconsin 6. Oregon 7. North Carolina 8. Florida 9. Nebraska 10. Kentucky This person has 7 out of the 10 in the exact spots... Success!
|
|
|
Post by bigfan2 on Sept 2, 2015 14:37:26 GMT -5
Stanford- 3 in the top 15 Is this class considered better than 2012 better? hard to say...there are some position disparities. For example in 2016 they are bringing in a top OPP and L, they didn't recruit those positions in 2012. But can Gray be an equal or better setter than Bugg? probably, will Fitzmorris be a better MB than Inky? probably not, will the Keefe's be a better OH tandem than Burgess and Howard? maybe, in some aspects of the game. ....at the end of the day, Stanford is reloading, who cares?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 14:37:58 GMT -5
Wow this class must be good if #12 didnt make the top 10
|
|
|
Post by onfiya on Sept 2, 2015 14:42:47 GMT -5
1. Lanier 2. Plummer 3. Fitzmorris 4. Agbaji 5. King 6. Stone 7. Scoles 8. Stivrins 9. Haggerty 10. Edmond
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 2, 2015 14:45:43 GMT -5
Wow this class must be good if #12 didnt make the top 10 It's just VERY deep on MB's. I think Pittman and King could have been top 5 recruits in previous classes. Granted King could still be a top 5 recruit (the list isn't out), but it's not what I would pick. She had a great showing at nationals, TAV just ran up against a stacked Arizona Storm team. WTF, why couldn't Washington get their hands on some of these great MB's...we NEEEEEEEEED some.
|
|
|
Post by bigfan2 on Sept 2, 2015 14:47:00 GMT -5
Stanford is reloading with an excellent and tall recruiting class. IMO Fitzmorris, Plummer and perhaps Hentz and Gray are the keys to the class of 2016. Gray at this time is not as good as Bugg was as a senior. She will not likely start as a freshman. Fitzmorris is better than Inky was as a senior in high school at Bishop Kelly. She has unlimited potential. Plummer is a very good setter for an Opp. Plummer will be a very good college player and she blocks very well for her age. The Keefe twins are not even close to as good as Burgess and Howard were at the same age. Burgess was an incredible high school player and Howard was also quite good. The Keefes have not shown much ability yet and are not as talented as the first 4 recruits in this class.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2015 14:55:12 GMT -5
Wow this class must be good if #12 didnt make the top 10 It's just VERY deep on MB's. I think Pittman and King could have been top 5 recruits in previous classes. Granted King could still be a top 5 recruit (the list isn't out), but it's not what I would pick. She had a great showing at nationals, TAV just ran up against a stacked Arizona Storm team. WTF, why couldn't Washington get their hands on some of these great MB's...we NEEEEEEEEED some. Yeah this class is absolutely stacked in the middle. And this may just be me but id take pittman over stivrins, i think shes more physical and has a little more potential.
|
|