|
Post by saywho on Sept 3, 2015 13:25:44 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. I agree. #10 is nothing to be ashamed of. But watching her all summer, I think she is very special. Oregon got a good one for sure!
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 3, 2015 13:27:29 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. I agree. #10 is nothing to be ashamed of. But watching her all summer, I think she is very special. Oregon got a good one for sure! There is probably a good chance that those who had input already input prior to the international matches.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 3, 2015 13:34:52 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. I agree. #10 is nothing to be ashamed of. But watching her all summer, I think she is very special. Oregon got a good one for sure! This is from two years ago...look at that speed, that versatility in the arm swing.... I just cannot believe there are 9 better front line players in this class than Ronika Stone.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Sept 3, 2015 13:40:49 GMT -5
Ducks fans are more than ecstatic to have #10 coming on board regardless of ranking. Our first Top 10 player
|
|
|
Post by John Tawa-VolleyballMag.com on Sept 3, 2015 16:43:47 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. Not a big fan of the word "oversight" in this context, as it does not correctly refer to a player ranked No. 10 in the country.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 3, 2015 16:47:00 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. Not a big fan of the word "oversight" in this context, as it does not correctly refer to a player ranked No. 10 in the country. perhaps that's too strong a word, but I do think she should been several places higher, 6 or 7. But I know it's a deep MB class.
|
|
|
Post by chancelucky on Sept 3, 2015 19:41:27 GMT -5
Out of curiousity, have you seen the 6-9 on the list play in person?
|
|
|
Post by BeiBei on Sept 3, 2015 19:48:54 GMT -5
given how many people were wrong after my 7 of 10 post, I knew it had to be something pretty drastic. Having Stone at #10 is an oversight, IMO. Not a big fan of the word "oversight" in this context, as it does not correctly refer to a player ranked No. 10 in the country. The only oversight I noticed was the write up on Jenna Gray. She was compared to Bryn Kehoe who led Stanford to a NC in 2004 (the article said 2003)
|
|