bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,552
|
Post by bluepenquin on Sept 28, 2015 20:45:22 GMT -5
RPI Futures is a projected season ending RPI based on the win probabilities for the remaining games on the schedule using the current Pablo rating. This includes projected adjustments on games completed and overall non conference schedule.
Teams projected to receive scheduling bonus: Illinois, Louisville, Stanford, Creighton, Wisconsin, Marquette, Texas A&M, North Carolina, & Utah.
Noted Teams to receive a scheduling penalty: Pittsburgh, UNCW, San Francisco, Villanova, & Temple
Projected RPI rank after adjustments. (PW RPI rank) Team (projected overall wins and losses, Projected Conference Wins & Losses) (SOS Rank) - RPI Rank before Adjustments
1. (1) Florida (25-3, 16-2) (2) - 1 2. (2) Texas (25-2, 15-1) (11) - 2 3. (6) USC (31-1, 19-1) (39) - 3 4. (3) Kansas (26-2, 14-2) (38) - 4 5. (7) Penn State (29-2, 18-2) (45) - 5 6. (4) UCLA (23-7, 14-6) (9) - 6 7. (5) Illinois (25-6, 16-4) (17) - 9 8. (13) Nebraska (25-5, 16-4) (21) - 7 9. (10) Minnesota (23-7, 15-5) (5) - 8 10. (23) Kentucky (23-7, 16-2) (8) - 10 11. (16) Arizona State (25-6, 14-6) (30) - 13 12. (12) Arkansas State (24-2, 15-1) (89) - 12 13. (11) Washington (27-3, 17-3) (64) - 11 14. (15) Ohio State (23-9, 12-8) (13) - 16 15. (9) BYU (25-4, 15-3) (63) - 15 16. (17) Western Kentucky (28-3, 15-1) (82) - 14 17. (22) Louisville (24-6, 18-2) (41) - 18 18. (14) Missouri (25-6, 13-5) (48) - 17 19. (25) Arkansas (24-6, 14-4) (58) - 19 20. (8) Stanford (20-8, 14-6) (25) - 23 21. (28) Creighton (22-9, 16-2) (20) - 22 22. (20) SMU (28-4, 18-2) (105) - 20 23. (24) Florida State (25-6, 18-2) (60) - 21 24. (18) Wisconsin (19-11, 11-9) (10) - 25 25. (33) Hawaii (26-1, 16-0) (162) - 24 26. (19) Marquette (23-8, 14-4) (42) - 26 27. (26) Michigan (20-11, 10-10) (16) - 28 28. (32) Wyoming (26-4, 16-2) (119) - 31 29. (29) Ohio (26-4, 16-0) (128) - 29 30. (36) Missouri State (23-8, 14-4) (65) - 30 31. (27) Rice (24-6, 14-2) (81) - 27 32. (31) Baylor (18-12, 6-10) (12) - 32 33. (21) Texas A&M (17-12, 10-8) (6) - 38 34. (38) Wichita State (24-8, 15-3) (78) - 35 35. (51) San Diego (20-10, 13-5) (28) - 33 36. (35) Arizona (21-11, 11-9) (33) - 36 37. (34) Iowa State (16-12, 9-7) (7) - 37 38. (41) Northwestern (16-15, 8-12) (1) - 34 39. (39) Pacific (21-9, 12-6) (55) - 40 40. (46) Pittsburgh (25-7, 15-5) (98) - 39 41. (57) Purdue (21-10, 12-8) (54) - 42 42. (37) Dayton (21-9, 12-2) (69) - 41 43. (44) Gonzaga (20-11, 11-7) (37) - 43 44. (48) Miami-FL (20-10, 13-7) (47) - 44 45. (49) Idaho State (21-9, 13-3) (77) - 45 46. (50) Kansas State (17-11, 9-7) (26) - 46 47. (43) North Carolina (17-12, 14-6) (27) - 50 48. (69) Santa Clara (19-11, 10-8) (50) - 47 49. (77) Saint Louis (23-7, 12-2) (111) - 48 50. (47) Iowa (17-16, 7-13) (15) - 51 51. (52) Colorado State (23-6, 15-3) (131) - 49 52. (58) UNC Wilmington (23-5, 14-2) (167) - 53 53. (30) San Francisco (21-10, 8-10) (72) - 52 54. (67) Oregon (15-14, 9-11) (18) - 54 55. (62) Villanova (22-9, 12-6) (87) - 55 56. (42) Southern Illinois (20-11, 11-7) (68) - 56 57. (45) Northern Arizona (22-7, 12-4) (129) - 57 58. (86) Lipscomb (20-9, 12-2) (99) - 58 59. (55) TCU (18-10, 8-8) (71) - 59 60. (94) Temple (25-7, 16-4) (144) - 60 61. (65) Chattanooga (26-3, 15-1) (239) - 61 62. (68) Texas-San Antonio (22-8, 13-3) (126) - 62 63. (40) Boise State (21-9, 13-5) (108) - 63 64. (114) Xavier (17-12, 13-5) (51) - 65 65. (59) Michigan State (16-15, 8-12) (29) - 68 66. (79) Sacramento State (26-5, 13-3) (223) - 66 67. (53) Loyola Marymount (15-15, 6-12) (24) - 74 68. (80) Syracuse (22-9, 13-7) (117) - 69 69. (63) Virginia (19-12, 11-9) (57) - 67 70. (93) Pepperdine (16-15, 7-11) (31) - 70 71. (84) James Madison (23-6, 13-3) (165) - 64 72. (64) Murray State (26-1, 16-0) (292) - 72 73. (108) Auburn (16-14, 8-10) (35) - 75 74. (91) Northern Iowa (17-14, 11-7) (40) - 76 75. (70) Towson (26-5, 12-4) (227) - 77 76. (56) Illinois State (21-10, 11-7) (109) - 79 77. (73) Cleveland State (24-6, 13-3) (210) - 73 78. (81) Loyola-Chicago (22-8, 12-6) (125) - 71 79. (71) Oklahoma (12-16, 6-10) (3) - 80 80. (83) Appalachian State (21-6, 14-2) (171) - 81 81. (96) St. Johns (22-11, 12-6) (101) - 82 82. (85) Rhode Island (20-7, 10-4) (151) - 78 83. (54) Virginia Tech (19-13, 10-10) (76) - 84 84. (87) Long Beach State (24-7, 13-3) (185) - 83 85. (61) North Dakota State (21-9, 12-4) (142) - 88 86. (105) Furman (19-7, 13-3) (176) - 85 87. (97) Coastal Carolina (22-4, 14-0) (250) - 86 88. (75) Cincinnati (21-10, 13-7) (113) - 87 89. (72) Texas-Arlington (20-8, 11-5) (159) - 90 90. (90) American (25-6, 15-1) (228) - 92 91. (74) Texas A&M-Corpus Christi (26-6, 14-2) (233) - 89 92. (104) Florida Atlantic (18-10, 10-6) (100) - 91 93. (88) New Mexico State (25-6, 13-1) (238) - 95 94. (66) Tennessee (23-10, 9-9) (150) - 93 95. (60) UCF (19-13, 13-7) (85) - 94 96. (110) IUPUI (23-7, 14-2) (216) - 98 97. (82) Denver (25-7, 13-3) (240) - 97 98. (111) LSU (12-17, 8-10) (14) - 99 99. (76) North Texas (17-14, 9-7) (80) - 100 100. (78) Washington State (18-14, 7-13) (67) - 96 101. (107) Yale (18-6, 12-2) (244) - 102 102. (115) New Mexico (18-13, 10-8) (97) - 103 103. (92) George Washington (20-10, 10-4) (163) - 104 104. (131) Arkansas-Little Rock (15-11, 11-5) (104) - 105 105. (103) Miami-OH (21-8, 13-3) (200) - 101 106. (120) Kennesaw State (17-8, 9-5) (196) - 106 107. (102) Cal Poly (19-8, 11-5) (213) - 107 108. (138) Northern Illinois (17-11, 13-3) (124) - 108 109. (116) Florida Gulf Coast (20-11, 9-5) (148) - 109 110. (109) College of Charleston (17-13, 9-7) (112) - 110 111. (122) Indiana State (19-14, 8-10) (114) - 112 112. (89) Indiana (14-18, 4-16) (43) - 113 113. (125) Valparaiso (26-6, 12-4) (287) - 114 114. (101) Duke (14-16, 9-11) (52) - 115 115. (135) Utah (11-20, 5-15) (19) - 122 116. (144) Georgia Tech (19-13, 10-10) (118) - 117 117. (106) Colorado (13-19, 5-15) (34) - 124 118. (113) Portland (16-15, 6-12) (88) - 121 119. (121) Army (21-8, 13-3) (234) - 111 120. (124) UNF (23-8, 9-5) (259) - 118 121. (100) Ole Miss (20-13, 6-12) (139) - 116 122. (128) Mississippi State (18-14, 8-10) (121) - 120 123. (118) Texas State (17-12, 11-5) (123) - 125 124. (137) Seattle (20-8, 12-2) (245) - 119 125. (95) UC Irvine (15-13, 9-7) (92) - 123
|
|
|
Post by BoilerUp! on Sept 28, 2015 21:58:30 GMT -5
Thank you for doing this!!!
|
|
|
Post by vballfan92 on Sept 28, 2015 22:13:28 GMT -5
Quick question: how high of an RPI on average does a team need to get an at-large bid?
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,552
|
Post by bluepenquin on Sept 28, 2015 22:20:11 GMT -5
Quick question: how high of an RPI on average does a team need to get an at-large bid? Others would know this better than me - but I generally think 45-50 is in the bubble. Some will make it in that range and others will not.
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on Sept 28, 2015 22:20:55 GMT -5
RPI Futures is a projected season ending RPI based on the win probabilities for the remaining games on the schedule using the current Pablo rating. This includes projected adjustments on games completed and overall non conference schedule.
Teams projected to receive scheduling bonus: Illinois, Louisville, Stanford, Creighton, Wisconsin, Marquette, Texas A&M, North Carolina, & Utah.
Noted Teams to receive a scheduling penalty: Pittsburgh, UNCW, San Francisco, Villanova, & Temple
Projected RPI rank after adjustments. (PW RPI rank) Team (projected overall wins and losses, Projected Conference Wins & Losses) (SOS Rank) - RPI Rank before Adjustments
1. (1) Florida (25-3, 16-2) (2) - 1 2. (2) Texas (25-2, 15-1) (11) - 2 3. (6) USC (31-1, 19-1) (39) - 3 4. (3) Kansas (26-2, 14-2) (38) - 4 5. (7) Penn State (29-2, 18-2) (45) - 5 6. (4) UCLA (23-7, 14-6) (9) - 6 7. (5) Illinois (25-6, 16-4) (17) - 9 8. (13) Nebraska (25-5, 16-4) (21) - 7 9. (10) Minnesota (23-7, 15-5) (5) - 8 10. (23) Kentucky (23-7, 16-2) (8) - 10 11. (16) Arizona State (25-6, 14-6) (30) - 13 12. (12) Arkansas State (24-2, 15-1) (89) - 12 13. (11) Washington (27-3, 17-3) (64) - 11 14. (15) Ohio State (23-9, 12-8) (13) - 16 15. (9) BYU (25-4, 15-3) (63) - 15 16. (17) Western Kentucky (28-3, 15-1) (82) - 14 17. (22) Louisville (24-6, 18-2) (41) - 18 18. (14) Missouri (25-6, 13-5) (48) - 17 19. (25) Arkansas (24-6, 14-4) (58) - 19 20. (8) Stanford (20-8, 14-6) (25) - 23 21. (28) Creighton (22-9, 16-2) (20) - 22 22. (20) SMU (28-4, 18-2) (105) - 20 23. (24) Florida State (25-6, 18-2) (60) - 21 24. (18) Wisconsin (19-11, 11-9) (10) - 25 25. (33) Hawaii (26-1, 16-0) (162) - 24 26. (19) Marquette (23-8, 14-4) (42) - 26 27. (26) Michigan (20-11, 10-10) (16) - 28 28. (32) Wyoming (26-4, 16-2) (119) - 31 29. (29) Ohio (26-4, 16-0) (128) - 29 30. (36) Missouri State (23-8, 14-4) (65) - 30 31. (27) Rice (24-6, 14-2) (81) - 27 32. (31) Baylor (18-12, 6-10) (12) - 32 33. (21) Texas A&M (17-12, 10-8) (6) - 38 34. (38) Wichita State (24-8, 15-3) (78) - 35 35. (51) San Diego (20-10, 13-5) (28) - 33 36. (35) Arizona (21-11, 11-9) (33) - 36 37. (34) Iowa State (16-12, 9-7) (7) - 37 38. (41) Northwestern (16-15, 8-12) (1) - 34 39. (39) Pacific (21-9, 12-6) (55) - 40 40. (46) Pittsburgh (25-7, 15-5) (98) - 39 41. (57) Purdue (21-10, 12-8) (54) - 42 42. (37) Dayton (21-9, 12-2) (69) - 41 43. (44) Gonzaga (20-11, 11-7) (37) - 43 44. (48) Miami-FL (20-10, 13-7) (47) - 44 45. (49) Idaho State (21-9, 13-3) (77) - 45 46. (50) Kansas State (17-11, 9-7) (26) - 46 47. (43) North Carolina (17-12, 14-6) (27) - 50 48. (69) Santa Clara (19-11, 10-8) (50) - 47 49. (77) Saint Louis (23-7, 12-2) (111) - 48 50. (47) Iowa (17-16, 7-13) (15) - 51 51. (52) Colorado State (23-6, 15-3) (131) - 49 52. (58) UNC Wilmington (23-5, 14-2) (167) - 53 53. (30) San Francisco (21-10, 8-10) (72) - 52 54. (67) Oregon (15-14, 9-11) (18) - 54 55. (62) Villanova (22-9, 12-6) (87) - 55 56. (42) Southern Illinois (20-11, 11-7) (68) - 56 57. (45) Northern Arizona (22-7, 12-4) (129) - 57 58. (86) Lipscomb (20-9, 12-2) (99) - 58 59. (55) TCU (18-10, 8-8) (71) - 59 60. (94) Temple (25-7, 16-4) (144) - 60 61. (65) Chattanooga (26-3, 15-1) (239) - 61 62. (68) Texas-San Antonio (22-8, 13-3) (126) - 62 63. (40) Boise State (21-9, 13-5) (108) - 63 64. (114) Xavier (17-12, 13-5) (51) - 65 65. (59) Michigan State (16-15, 8-12) (29) - 68 66. (79) Sacramento State (26-5, 13-3) (223) - 66 67. (53) Loyola Marymount (15-15, 6-12) (24) - 74 68. (80) Syracuse (22-9, 13-7) (117) - 69 69. (63) Virginia (19-12, 11-9) (57) - 67 70. (93) Pepperdine (16-15, 7-11) (31) - 70 71. (84) James Madison (23-6, 13-3) (165) - 64 72. (64) Murray State (26-1, 16-0) (292) - 72 73. (108) Auburn (16-14, 8-10) (35) - 75 74. (91) Northern Iowa (17-14, 11-7) (40) - 76 75. (70) Towson (26-5, 12-4) (227) - 77 76. (56) Illinois State (21-10, 11-7) (109) - 79 77. (73) Cleveland State (24-6, 13-3) (210) - 73 78. (81) Loyola-Chicago (22-8, 12-6) (125) - 71 79. (71) Oklahoma (12-16, 6-10) (3) - 80 80. (83) Appalachian State (21-6, 14-2) (171) - 81 81. (96) St. Johns (22-11, 12-6) (101) - 82 82. (85) Rhode Island (20-7, 10-4) (151) - 78 83. (54) Virginia Tech (19-13, 10-10) (76) - 84 84. (87) Long Beach State (24-7, 13-3) (185) - 83 85. (61) North Dakota State (21-9, 12-4) (142) - 88 86. (105) Furman (19-7, 13-3) (176) - 85 87. (97) Coastal Carolina (22-4, 14-0) (250) - 86 88. (75) Cincinnati (21-10, 13-7) (113) - 87 89. (72) Texas-Arlington (20-8, 11-5) (159) - 90 90. (90) American (25-6, 15-1) (228) - 92 91. (74) Texas A&M-Corpus Christi (26-6, 14-2) (233) - 89 92. (104) Florida Atlantic (18-10, 10-6) (100) - 91 93. (88) New Mexico State (25-6, 13-1) (238) - 95 94. (66) Tennessee (23-10, 9-9) (150) - 93 95. (60) UCF (19-13, 13-7) (85) - 94 96. (110) IUPUI (23-7, 14-2) (216) - 98 97. (82) Denver (25-7, 13-3) (240) - 97 98. (111) LSU (12-17, 8-10) (14) - 99 99. (76) North Texas (17-14, 9-7) (80) - 100 100. (78) Washington State (18-14, 7-13) (67) - 96 101. (107) Yale (18-6, 12-2) (244) - 102 102. (115) New Mexico (18-13, 10-8) (97) - 103 103. (92) George Washington (20-10, 10-4) (163) - 104 104. (131) Arkansas-Little Rock (15-11, 11-5) (104) - 105 105. (103) Miami-OH (21-8, 13-3) (200) - 101 106. (120) Kennesaw State (17-8, 9-5) (196) - 106 107. (102) Cal Poly (19-8, 11-5) (213) - 107 108. (138) Northern Illinois (17-11, 13-3) (124) - 108 109. (116) Florida Gulf Coast (20-11, 9-5) (148) - 109 110. (109) College of Charleston (17-13, 9-7) (112) - 110 111. (122) Indiana State (19-14, 8-10) (114) - 112 112. (89) Indiana (14-18, 4-16) (43) - 113 113. (125) Valparaiso (26-6, 12-4) (287) - 114 114. (101) Duke (14-16, 9-11) (52) - 115 115. (135) Utah (11-20, 5-15) (19) - 122 116. (144) Georgia Tech (19-13, 10-10) (118) - 117 117. (106) Colorado (13-19, 5-15) (34) - 124 118. (113) Portland (16-15, 6-12) (88) - 121 119. (121) Army (21-8, 13-3) (234) - 111 120. (124) UNF (23-8, 9-5) (259) - 118 121. (100) Ole Miss (20-13, 6-12) (139) - 116 122. (128) Mississippi State (18-14, 8-10) (121) - 120 123. (118) Texas State (17-12, 11-5) (123) - 125 124. (137) Seattle (20-8, 12-2) (245) - 119 125. (95) UC Irvine (15-13, 9-7) (92) - 123
I will be interested in revisiting this late in the year. I actually think it looks right.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 28, 2015 22:40:18 GMT -5
Washington will lose more than 3 matches this year...I'd bet on that.
|
|
|
Post by Cubicle No More ... on Sept 28, 2015 23:04:36 GMT -5
it's very interesting seeing how this tracks each week ... thanks for doing this! 25. (33) Hawaii (26-1, 16-0) (162) - 24 interesting. 2 matches into conference play, and this projection has changed. i'm not so sure this actually happens, as this team hasn't been tested on the road yet. (and last year's team was very vulnerable on the road.) but it will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Sept 28, 2015 23:14:11 GMT -5
Quick question: how high of an RPI on average does a team need to get an at-large bid? If the committee went strictly by RPI (they don't) and every favorite won their conference tournament (they won't), #48 Santa Clara would be the last team in and #49 Saint Louis would be the first team out based on this projection.
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Sept 28, 2015 23:18:19 GMT -5
An unseeded Stanford is a bracket buster.
|
|
trojansc
Legend
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_yellow.png)
All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017), All-VolleyTalk 2nd Team (2016), 2021, 2019 Fantasy League Champion, 2020 Fantasy League Runner Up, 2022 2nd Runner Up
Posts: 29,004
|
Post by trojansc on Sept 29, 2015 0:04:26 GMT -5
Quick question: how high of an RPI on average does a team need to get an at-large bid? If the committee went strictly by RPI (they don't) and every favorite won their conference tournament (they won't), #48 Santa Clara would be the last team in and #49 Saint Louis would be the first team out based on this projection. Good call. Usually #46-#49 is the cutoff. If you're in the 50s, you'd better have beaten some good teams if you want in.
|
|
|
Post by klineam on Sept 29, 2015 4:03:00 GMT -5
How's Duke #114? And Miami who has lost 2-0 in the ACC is #44? Something is wrong.
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,552
|
Post by bluepenquin on Sept 29, 2015 7:00:30 GMT -5
How's Duke #114? And Miami who has lost 2-0 in the ACC is #44? Something is wrong. (This is projected season ending RPI - not current RPI)
The quick answer is that the Pablo rating has Miami as the 4th or 5th best team in the ACC and Duke as only the 9th. As a result, Pablo is projecting Duke to go just 8-10 in their remaining games compared to Miami going 13-5. Their RPI SOS are pretty similar - although Miami is just a tad better and Miami has the extra win in non conference. As a result - Duke will have to exceed Miami in conference play in order to have a better RPI by season end.
As for the 1st week in conference - Miami lost to the 2 best teams in conference on the road (Florida State and Louisville), while Duke split home matches against much lessor opponents.
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star_blue.png)
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,552
|
Post by bluepenquin on Sept 29, 2015 7:09:04 GMT -5
it's very interesting seeing how this tracks each week ... thanks for doing this! 25. (33) Hawaii (26-1, 16-0) (162) - 24 interesting. 2 matches into conference play, and this projection has changed. i'm not so sure this actually happens, as this team hasn't been tested on the road yet. (and last year's team was very vulnerable on the road.) but it will be interesting to see how it all plays out. Much of this is rounding - last week Hawaii was projected to win 14.38 conference matches and this week it is up to 15.54.
Last week's projection thought there was about a 25% chance of losing one game - so Hawaii 'picked up' 0.25 wins over last weeks projection by sweeping. More importantly - Hawaii's Pablo rating improved so the chances of Hawaii winning each upcoming game increased.
This conference is killing Hawaii's chances of getting a good RPI.
|
|
|
Post by dorothymantooth on Sept 29, 2015 7:17:33 GMT -5
Washington will lose more than 3 matches this year...I'd bet on that. agreed, they would need to win nearly all those toss-up matches to finish with that record.
|
|
|
Post by Freeman on Sept 29, 2015 7:41:57 GMT -5
Quick question: how high of an RPI on average does a team need to get an at-large bid? If the committee went strictly by RPI (they don't) and every favorite won their conference tournament (they won't), #48 Santa Clara would be the last team in and #49 Saint Louis would be the first team out based on this projection. Woah woah woah. When was that announcement made? The committee has stopped going strictly by RPI?
|
|