|
|
Post by volleyguy on Aug 15, 2016 11:07:23 GMT -5
Team Stats in Pool Play Spike Brazil 34.66% USA 32.87% CHN 30.95% RUS 30.68% SRB 29.12% NED 28.29% KOR 25.96% JPN 24.05% Block RUS 3.19 BRA 3.0 SRB 2.56 NED 2.48 CHN 2.44 USA 2.05 JPN 1.69 KOR 1.53 SERVE RUS 2.25 BRA 2.07 KOR 2.06 JPN 1.81 SRB 1.39 CHN 1.33 NED 1.14 USA 1.0 Reception BRA 44.03% USA 39.29% RUS 37.45% JPN 36.83% SRB 32.83% CHN 32.80% KOR 30.25% NED 26.86% www.rio2016.com/en/volleyball-vo-women-download |
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Aug 15, 2016 11:25:33 GMT -5
Makes you wonder how the Netherlands has had such great results. I mean just flush convention down the toilet. They've been poor in service and reception. Ordinary in other departments. Of course these stats don't tell you everything. There's not a good straightforward defensive metric in VB (certainly not "digs"). Then there's that mysterious hoodoo...conjuring up errors from your opponent...I suspect this is where the Dutch are really excelling.  |
|
|
|
Post by Gilmoy on Aug 15, 2016 12:15:25 GMT -5
Meh, those numbers don't measure digs or rally length. Clearly, what's happening is that the Netherlands' poor passing neuters their middle attack, they get into long rallies, and eventually Slöetjes kills  |
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Aug 15, 2016 12:23:11 GMT -5
No. It's because Netherlands is high error.
|
|
|
|
Post by jma1968 on Aug 15, 2016 13:25:03 GMT -5
When the broadcasts show individual blocking and digging stats, they show them as a ratio: x / y. For example, blocking might be 1/13, and digs 4/10. I assume those are successes / attempts (as in, 1 block in 13 attempts, or 4 digs in 10 attempts). Is that correct?
When did this start? And do you find this more useful? I would, if I could find aggregations of these statistics. But on a single match basis, they are not informative for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by BuckysHeat on Aug 15, 2016 13:38:04 GMT -5
Highest serving percentage - Cameroon @ 0.882
Highest Ace percentage - Russia @ 9.25%, Korea @ 9.02%
Lowest fault to ace ratio - Brazil (31/31) and Russia (36/36)
Lowest serving percentage - Serbia @ 0.794
Lowest ace percentage - USA @ 4.30%, Argentina @ 4.29%
Highest fault to ace ratio - USA @ 3.30 faults/ace (66/20)
|
|
|
|
Post by BuckysHeat on Aug 15, 2016 13:59:48 GMT -5
Men's serving stats:
Highest serving percentage - Iran @ 0.824; Russia @ 0.802
Highest Ace percentage - USA @ 6.92%, Egypt @ 6.51%
Lowest fault to ace ratio - Egypt 2.42 (46/19) and USA 2.76 (80/29)
Lowest serving percentage - Poland @ 0.719; Cuba @ 0.733; USA @ 0.740
Lowest ace percentage - Mexico @ 1.76%
Highest fault to ace ratio - Mexico @ 11.60 faults/ace (58/5)
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyfan24 on Aug 15, 2016 14:10:58 GMT -5
Stats in volleyball are always a flawed metric cause it's impossible to measure everything like forced errors, block touches etc.
I have said it since the beginning of the tourney the US serving has been abysmal. We clean that up and we would be that much better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reach on Aug 15, 2016 14:19:21 GMT -5
Also hard to compare two pools of play. Russia and Brazil were not really challenged and thus their stats are near the top for most things.
|
|
|
|
Post by Disc808 on Aug 15, 2016 14:31:11 GMT -5
Also interesting that Zhu Ting is more efficient than Foluke
|
|
