|
Post by c4ndlelight on Apr 29, 2019 11:31:12 GMT -5
Robo's free ball bump-kill completely changed the 2nd set around. The Turkish liberos are terrible lately. The mostly non-English live chat is flaming the liberos. The local liberos and middles are really letting down the top Turkish teams this year.
|
|
|
Post by mapuan on Apr 29, 2019 13:54:30 GMT -5
larson has no reception, no blocking and no attack this match.
Motta should've benched her.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 29, 2019 14:07:39 GMT -5
larson has no reception, no blocking and no attack this match. Motta should've benched her. Just looking at the stats, Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, on either side of the net. Looks like she was the best server for Eczacibasi as well. Her offensive numbers are definitely concerning though. Where did this offensive performance from Krob come from?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2019 14:51:01 GMT -5
larson has no reception, no blocking and no attack this match. Motta should've benched her. Just looking at the stats, Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, on either side of the net. Looks like she was the best server for Eczacibasi as well. Her offensive numbers are definitely concerning though. Where did this offensive performance from Krob come from? U should watch the game . Larson's reception was not good. And she can't defend either. I'm not hating... You should watch the game on YouTube.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 29, 2019 15:01:49 GMT -5
Just looking at the stats, Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, on either side of the net. Looks like she was the best server for Eczacibasi as well. Her offensive numbers are definitely concerning though. Where did this offensive performance from Krob come from? U should watch the game . Larson's reception was not good. And she can't defend either. I'm not hating... You should watch the game on YouTube. You should learn how to appropriately respond to arguments. Nothing you said above refutes what I posted. Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, one either side of the net. Prove me wrong. Receptions / Errors / Positive / PerfectLarson: 22 / - / 55% / 23%Kim: 12 / 1 / 50% / 17% Krob: 17 / 3 / 41% / 18% Zhu: 25 / 2 / 44% / 8%
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2019 15:06:29 GMT -5
U should watch the game . Larson's reception was not good. And she can't defend either. I'm not hating... You should watch the game on YouTube. You should learn how to appropriately respond to arguments. Nothing you said above refutes what I posted. Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, one either side of the net. Prove me wrong. Receptions / Errors / Positive / PerfectLarson: 22 / - / 55% / 23%Kim: 12 / 1 / 50% / 17% Krob: 17 / 3 / 41% / 18% Zhu: 25 / 2 / 44% / 8% Who come up with these numbers ? It is simply one person giving basically a score...it is up to what he or she thinks. Like I said. If you think Larson had the best reception you did not watch the game at all... Stats is on thing...the actual game is another thing. I was not even arguing with you. I was not even the one that said Larson played bad. That's why I told u to watch the game...so go watch the game and let me know if u think Larson had the best reception on the court.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2019 15:15:18 GMT -5
And it is ok if your favorite player had a bad game . There's no reason to make excuses..the world is not gonna end. They are humans just like all the rest of us.
Larson had a bad game....and guess what??... That's OK...it happens. It is part of the game.
|
|
|
Post by vollem on Apr 29, 2019 15:55:04 GMT -5
larson has no reception, no blocking and no attack this match. Motta should've benched her. Just looking at the stats, Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, on either side of the net. Looks like she was the best server for Eczacibasi as well. Her offensive numbers are definitely concerning though. Where did this offensive performance from Krob come from? It took me a shameful amount of time to figure out who "Krob" is (read it as a player's actual name). I was going to comment on Kelsey's offense. She had a great game! (Plus a bump-kill )
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 29, 2019 16:18:12 GMT -5
You should learn how to appropriately respond to arguments. Nothing you said above refutes what I posted. Larson had the best OH passing numbers on the floor, one either side of the net. Prove me wrong. Receptions / Errors / Positive / PerfectLarson: 22 / - / 55% / 23%Kim: 12 / 1 / 50% / 17% Krob: 17 / 3 / 41% / 18% Zhu: 25 / 2 / 44% / 8% Who come up with these numbers ? It is simply one person giving basically a score...it is up to what he or she thinks. Like I said. If you think Larson had the best reception you did not watch the game at all... Stats is on thing...the actual game is another thing. I was not even arguing with you. I was not even the one that said Larson played bad. That's why I told u to watch the game...so go watch the game and let me know if u think Larson had the best reception on the court. And it is ok if your favorite player had a bad game . There's no reason to make excuses..the world is not gonna end. They are humans just like all the rest of us. Larson had a bad game....and guess what??... That's OK...it happens. It is part of the game. Are you kidding me? You, the infamous poster who consistently cites the # of sets Carlini sends to her middles as evidence she is a bad setter, are going to toss out the Turkish League's official stats sheet because they contradict your biased account of the game? If you don't understand how passing is scored (lol'ing at 'it is up to what he or she thinks'), 1) you realllllllly should humble yourself even further on this forum and 2) you should go look it up. Even if in some alternate universe passing stats were completely arbitrary, there is zero reason to believe that said wizards who grant these stats would just give Larson better numbers. And also zero reason to believe that these wizards are less credible than you. Yes, based on the stats, Larson had the best reception out of the OHs. I have provided evidence to prove it. If you want to launch a study into the inaccuracies of the official reporting for the Turkish League, be my guest, but that would take an advanced understanding of statistical analysis, which you obviously lack. Your extremely ignorant "stats is on[e] thing... the actual game is another thing" approach doesn't disprove my point, no matter how many times you tell me to go and watch the game (which I will). Once you've taken a basic logic and reasoning class, or a science class where you learn about the power of evidence, then we can chat. BTW - never said Larson had a good or bad game. I said she passed better than the other OHs. Nothing I posted demonstrates any "excuses" or biases , but instead I used evidence to refute a claim that was made. Again, stay in school, and you'll learn about all of this.
|
|
|
Post by vbprisoner on Apr 29, 2019 16:32:09 GMT -5
Who come up with these numbers ? It is simply one person giving basically a score...it is up to what he or she thinks. Like I said. If you think Larson had the best reception you did not watch the game at all... Stats is on thing...the actual game is another thing. I was not even arguing with you. I was not even the one that said Larson played bad. That's why I told u to watch the game...so go watch the game and let me know if u think Larson had the best reception on the court. And it is ok if your favorite player had a bad game . There's no reason to make excuses..the world is not gonna end. They are humans just like all the rest of us. Larson had a bad game....and guess what??... That's OK...it happens. It is part of the game. Are you kidding me? You, the infamous poster who consistently cites the # of sets Carlini sends to her middles as evidence she is a bad setter, are going to toss out the Turkish League's official stats sheet because they contradict your biased account of the game? If you don't understand how passing is scored (lol'ing at 'it is up to what he or she thinks'), 1) you realllllllly should humble yourself even further on this forum and 2) you should go look it up. Even if in some alternate universe passing stats were completely arbitrary, there is zero reason to believe that said wizards who grant these stats would just give Larson better numbers. And also zero reason to believe that these wizards are less credible than you. Yes, based on the stats, Larson had the best reception out of the OHs. I have provided evidence to prove it. If you want to launch a study into the inaccuracies of the official reporting for the Turkish League, be my guest, but that would take an advanced understanding of statistical analysis, which you obviously lack. Your extremely ignorant "stats is on[e] thing... the actual game is another thing" approach doesn't disprove my point, no matter how many times you tell me to go and watch the game (which I will). Once you've taken a basic logic and reasoning class, or a science class where you learn about the power of evidence, then we can chat. BTW - never said Larson had a good or bad game. I said she passed better than the other OHs. Nothing I posted demonstrates any "excuses" or biases , but instead I used evidence to refute a claim that was made. Again, stay in school, and you'll learn about all of this. ROFLMAO... donut that comment is sooooo shhhhhhh!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2019 17:26:51 GMT -5
R we supposed to praise them even when they play horribly like Larson did today??.. I guess so...
Larson had a fantastic game. Amazing defense, Amazing reception, amazing spikes, amazing serves. She was MVP.
Hopefully that makes it better.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 29, 2019 17:34:12 GMT -5
Are you kidding me? You, the infamous poster who consistently cites the # of sets Carlini sends to her middles as evidence she is a bad setter, are going to toss out the Turkish League's official stats sheet because they contradict your biased account of the game? If you don't understand how passing is scored (lol'ing at 'it is up to what he or she thinks'), 1) you realllllllly should humble yourself even further on this forum and 2) you should go look it up. Even if in some alternate universe passing stats were completely arbitrary, there is zero reason to believe that said wizards who grant these stats would just give Larson better numbers. And also zero reason to believe that these wizards are less credible than you. Yes, based on the stats, Larson had the best reception out of the OHs. I have provided evidence to prove it. If you want to launch a study into the inaccuracies of the official reporting for the Turkish League, be my guest, but that would take an advanced understanding of statistical analysis, which you obviously lack. Your extremely ignorant "stats is on[e] thing... the actual game is another thing" approach doesn't disprove my point, no matter how many times you tell me to go and watch the game (which I will). Once you've taken a basic logic and reasoning class, or a science class where you learn about the power of evidence, then we can chat. BTW - never said Larson had a good or bad game. I said she passed better than the other OHs. Nothing I posted demonstrates any "excuses" or biases , but instead I used evidence to refute a claim that was made. Again, stay in school, and you'll learn about all of this. ROFLMAO... donut that comment is sooooo shhhhhhh!!! Hi vbp, miss you!
|
|
|
Post by vollem on Apr 29, 2019 18:01:16 GMT -5
More links for games of the last week:
Repost of today's match, but different camera angle:
|
|
|
Post by ironhammer on Apr 29, 2019 19:27:20 GMT -5
Are you kidding me? You, the infamous poster who consistently cites the # of sets Carlini sends to her middles as evidence she is a bad setter, are going to toss out the Turkish League's official stats sheet because they contradict your biased account of the game? If you don't understand how passing is scored (lol'ing at 'it is up to what he or she thinks'), 1) you realllllllly should humble yourself even further on this forum and 2) you should go look it up. Even if in some alternate universe passing stats were completely arbitrary, there is zero reason to believe that said wizards who grant these stats would just give Larson better numbers. And also zero reason to believe that these wizards are less credible than you. Yes, based on the stats, Larson had the best reception out of the OHs. I have provided evidence to prove it. If you want to launch a study into the inaccuracies of the official reporting for the Turkish League, be my guest, but that would take an advanced understanding of statistical analysis, which you obviously lack. Your extremely ignorant "stats is on[e] thing... the actual game is another thing" approach doesn't disprove my point, no matter how many times you tell me to go and watch the game (which I will). Once you've taken a basic logic and reasoning class, or a science class where you learn about the power of evidence, then we can chat. BTW - never said Larson had a good or bad game. I said she passed better than the other OHs. Nothing I posted demonstrates any "excuses" or biases , but instead I used evidence to refute a claim that was made. Again, stay in school, and you'll learn about all of this. ROFLMAO... donut that comment is sooooo shhhhhhh!!! Aren't they the same person? Either that or duncaroo is shhhhhhh's side-kick/yes-man. At least I don't use multiple accounts or say yes to whatever my boss says...
|
|
|
Post by vbprisoner on Apr 29, 2019 20:50:28 GMT -5
ROFLMAO... donut that comment is sooooo shhhhhhh!!! Aren't they the same person? Either that or duncaroo is shhhhhhh's side-kick/yes-man. At least I don't use multiple accounts or say yes to whatever my boss says... Nah, duncaroo is a Nebraska fan and now lives in the south. He gets a little passionate around facts and accuracy. shhhhh is shhhhh and should never be confused as being anyone else on this board! He follows B1G and over the last two years has mellowed quite a bit. Both participated in VT Fantasy league last year and because of their knowledge of NCAA women's vball they were both on the VT Top 25 voter committee. I know they are not the same person because I had to deal with them both regularly, and sometimes in group PMs where they were both posting at same time. Both are good dudes though, so just have fun sparring but don't take it serious.
|
|