|
Post by volleyguy on Apr 10, 2024 22:51:45 GMT -5
Classic ladies of the view comments. Sunny Hostin claimed that the Eclipse was due to climate change.Opinionated and stupid. That’s a rare combination. Never heard of her. On the other hand... Hoo, baby, MTG be crazy. People have weird eclipse theories. The LA Times reported that the mother who stabbed her live-in boyfriend to death, pushed her kids out of the moving car onto the 405 freeway, and crashed her vehicle into a tree was an online astrologist and healer who was on Twitter for several days before the incident claiming the eclipse was signaling the Apocalypse and people had to choose between good and evil. Truly sad.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Apr 10, 2024 23:08:26 GMT -5
Never heard of her. On the other hand... Hoo, baby, MTG be crazy. People have weird eclipse theories. The LA Times reported that the mother who stabbed her live-in boyfriend to death, pushed her kids out of the moving car onto the 405 freeway, and crashed her vehicle into a tree was an online astrologist and healer who was on Twitter for several days before the incident claiming the eclipse was signaling the Apocalypse and people had to choose between good and evil. Truly sad. She wrecked her car not far from me, across the street from Redondo Union High. It was pretty much unrecognizable as a car, I can't imagine how fast she was going on PCH.
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Apr 10, 2024 23:14:25 GMT -5
People have weird eclipse theories. The LA Times reported that the mother who stabbed her live-in boyfriend to death, pushed her kids out of the moving car onto the 405 freeway, and crashed her vehicle into a tree was an online astrologist and healer who was on Twitter for several days before the incident claiming the eclipse was signaling the Apocalypse and people had to choose between good and evil. Truly sad. She wrecked her car not far from me, across the street from Redondo Union High. It was pretty much unrecognizable as a car, I can't imagine how fast she was going on PCH. If it was deliberate, at least it was quick and minimized the collateral damage.
|
|
|
Post by mikegarrison on Apr 10, 2024 23:17:34 GMT -5
She wrecked her car not far from me, across the street from Redondo Union High. It was pretty much unrecognizable as a car, I can't imagine how fast she was going on PCH. That's what happens when you hit a tree. One of the most dangerous things you can hit with a car. Trees just don't give way. And they are like swords -- they concentrate the entire force of the impact into a small area. Concrete walls are so very, very much better to hit than trees.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Apr 11, 2024 3:16:48 GMT -5
Classic ladies of the view comments. Sunny Hostin claimed that the Eclipse was due to climate change.Opinionated and stupid. That’s a rare combination. Never heard of her. On the other hand... Hoo, baby, MTG be crazy. It’s climate change.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Apr 11, 2024 8:05:21 GMT -5
I mean...this stuff enrages Republicans? "I have an ongoing game of Words With Friends on my iPad with Martina Navratilova," Navarro said during a Hot Topics discussion — the latest celebrity name-drop from the cohost, who often brings up her friendships with the likes of Gloria Estefan, Eva Longoria, and more.
"Of course," Joy Behar said. "Do you know anybody who's not famous?" Goldberg's eyes then shot skyward as she leaned back in her chair, letting her arms fall to her sides as if she'd lost consciousness.
"She lives in Miami. She's a friend of mine," Navarro replied, adding that "Susie Davis" is Behar's "best friend" — though she actually meant Curb Your Enthusiasm star Susie Essman, Behar's actual bestie.
Goldberg remained in her faux-unconscious state for approximately 20 seconds, maintaining her posture even as the show's theme song began to play, signaling an impending commercial break.
Then the Oscar-winning Ghost actress resurrected herself, looked to the camera, and said, "We'll be right back" before placing her head in her hand and shaking it back and forth before the show cut to ads." Her fake Wednesday collapse marks the third time Goldberg has played into the physical bit over the past year. She first fell to the table in November 2023 and then did it again in January of this year.www.yahoo.com/entertainment/whoopi-goldberg-collapses-view-ana-180000258.htmlHey, isn't Ana Navarro a conservative writer? Nah, it's probably more the things like this that anger Republicans "Take a look at the things that they're rolling back. Remember I said ages ago, you know, they -- in their minds, they want to bring slavery back. They're OK with it.Whoopi said this yesterday, I'm surprised you missed it. Although a member of the Republican Party, Navarro describes herself as a centrist (got that from wiki so I "grain of salt" that comment) so YMMV.
|
|
|
Post by mervinswerved on Apr 11, 2024 8:14:34 GMT -5
Where does Berliner say he's a liberal? From the outside it's certainly not how I would describe someone doing the right wing grift tour. I was certain that he said it in the interview, I saw, but I could be mistaken. He does say that from the survey he took there were no Republicans and he didn't identify himself as the lone republican or conservative on staff. Just cuz he's smart enough to say what a certain segment of the population wants to hear doesn't mean he wholeheartedly agrees with them. You can be a liberal and be on Fox. They have a few. Maybe Berliner is a liberal in the way bluepenquin says Jon Turley is a liberal.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Apr 11, 2024 8:27:27 GMT -5
Hoo boy, I thought no one could be more in the weeds than square and here you come giving 'em a run for their money. Tell you what, how about you treat this like a Christopher Nolan movie and start from my most recent post and work backwards. Maybe that will clear up your confusion about what I'm talking about, and then again, maybe not. I am confused by you again. You wrote: “Regardless, when it comes to an election, if you want to report the whole story, mentioning that the majority of candidates didn’t want the eventual winner is something should be reported. Your willingness to ignore the whole of a story because you don’t like parts of it is telling. Tell the whole story (bias free) and let people decide. But you’re the one who wouldn’t report such a fact when it should be duly noted.” So I assumed you were saying if a news organization does not make a point about the winner of an election not receiving the majority, it is biased somehow. I will say news organizations addressed the difference in voting for one candidate over another. But hardly ever discuss not reaching a majority. And certainly not about 190 million or so not voting for the winner of the 2016 presidential election. Or 200 million not voting for the winner of the 2020. That is a fact too, correct? My bad I should've said voters not candidates. You can report "facts" and not report the whole truth connected to the "facts". Nope, I'm saying that if the whole truth about an election result (or any story for that matter) isn't presented, it could be because of bias.
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 11, 2024 8:35:37 GMT -5
I am confused by you again. You wrote: “Regardless, when it comes to an election, if you want to report the whole story, mentioning that the majority of candidates didn’t want the eventual winner is something should be reported. Your willingness to ignore the whole of a story because you don’t like parts of it is telling. Tell the whole story (bias free) and let people decide. But you’re the one who wouldn’t report such a fact when it should be duly noted.” So I assumed you were saying if a news organization does not make a point about the winner of an election not receiving the majority, it is biased somehow. I will say news organizations addressed the difference in voting for one candidate over another. But hardly ever discuss not reaching a majority. And certainly not about 190 million or so not voting for the winner of the 2016 presidential election. Or 200 million not voting for the winner of the 2020. That is a fact too, correct? My bad I should've said voters not candidates. You can report "facts" and not report the whole truth connected to the "facts". Nope, I'm saying that if the whole truth about an election result (or any story for that matter) isn't presented, it could be because of bias. Day two of still explaining your silly example.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Apr 11, 2024 8:37:06 GMT -5
My bad I should've said voters not candidates. You can report "facts" and not report the whole truth connected to the "facts". Nope, I'm saying that if the whole truth about an election result (or any story for that matter) isn't presented, it could be because of bias. Day two of still explaining your silly example. vbman100 had questions, should I have ignored them?
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 11, 2024 8:44:44 GMT -5
Day two of still explaining your silly example. vbman100 had questions, should I have ignored them? you should try and make posts that you don't have to explain for days on end.
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Apr 11, 2024 8:55:14 GMT -5
vbman100 had questions, should I have ignored them? you should try and make posts that you don't have to explain for days on end. That aside, should I have ignored vb's question?
|
|
|
Post by jsquare on Apr 11, 2024 9:02:01 GMT -5
you should try and make posts that you don't have to explain for days on end. That aside, should I have ignored vb's question? why do you continue to drone on with more useless questions?
|
|
bluepenquin
Hall of Fame
4-Time VolleyTalk Poster of the Year (2019, 2018, 2017, 2016), All-VolleyTalk 1st Team (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Posts: 12,447
|
Post by bluepenquin on Apr 11, 2024 11:40:00 GMT -5
I was certain that he said it in the interview, I saw, but I could be mistaken. He does say that from the survey he took there were no Republicans and he didn't identify himself as the lone republican or conservative on staff. Just cuz he's smart enough to say what a certain segment of the population wants to hear doesn't mean he wholeheartedly agrees with them. You can be a liberal and be on Fox. They have a few. Maybe Berliner is a liberal in the way bluepenquin says Jon Turley is a liberal. If we had a scale in America from 0-100 - with 0 being right of center and 100 being left of center. Pretty clear that Turley would be > 50.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Apr 11, 2024 12:00:42 GMT -5
Have you noticed that Democrats even hate anyone with any common sense? Turley is certainly not a conservative, not even remotely. He shared just tell vicious and terrible people of been since he joined Fox. That’s the Democrat party. They attack anyone who disagrees with them. I keep repeating this but they don’t care. They know they’re out of control and they’re not willing to try to correct themselves whatsoever.
|
|