|
|
Post by swaggyp on Oct 6, 2024 14:52:02 GMT -5
Keep this going Bucky. Nice win. I didn’t catch exactly the middle rotations but I’m glad CC got some front row play in addition to serving. You can’t separate this from the team getting a little healthier but this rotation seemed the least Mad Scientist-y of any game so far. |
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 6, 2024 15:15:27 GMT -5
Another Booth/Orzoł block. Is that a Boolia block? In my old age, I've had to learn the word 'portmanteau'. |
|
|
|
Post by mnbadger on Oct 6, 2024 15:24:25 GMT -5
Just got home. Really excellent play from the Badgers; they looked prepared for the match. Washington didn't really provide any curveballs that would have made Wisconsin second guess anything. Clock it, build on it. On to Maryland.
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Oct 6, 2024 15:25:23 GMT -5
So quiet.....Troy had better traffic than this thread. Sheffield is not giving us anything to complain about  I have one! In the third set, Washington was out of subs with the Badgers at about 19 or so (actually at 14 subs, but with no real way to use the 15th), and their left #18 Endsley was playing backrow. But we never served her. C'mon man, serve the player who doesn't usually do serve-receive! (No idea if she's any good at receive or not, but give it a try.) That's the 'best' I got. The rest was just outstanding play by the Badgers. |
|
|
|
Post by tomclen on Oct 6, 2024 15:36:59 GMT -5
Trying to be optimistic, here. Washington set scores were 8; 14; 21. Given that trend-line, if this was best 4-out-of-7 sets we might have had a reverse sweep!  |
|
|
|
Post by hopefuldawg on Oct 6, 2024 15:42:07 GMT -5
Trying to be optimistic, here. Washington set scores were 8; 14; 21. Given that trend-line, if this was best 4-out-of-7 sets we might have had a reverse sweep! 😂 Let's try actual optimistic takes lol: 1. Getting swept by Wisconsin is unlikely to keep Washington out of the NCAA tournament 2. This is hardly the first time this season a ranked team has been demolished by another ranked team |
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Oct 6, 2024 15:42:19 GMT -5
Trying to be optimistic, here. Washington set scores were 8; 14; 21. Given that trend-line, if this was best 4-out-of-7 sets we might have had a reverse sweep! That’s the spirit! |
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Oct 6, 2024 15:51:57 GMT -5
Honestly though, the first two sets were undoubtedly the best I’ve seen the badgers play this year taking all phases of play into account. I would have like to see them get punched back so we could see them respond, but while the huskies started to get on track in the third attacking wise, the rest of their play didn’t step up and give them much of a chance.
This badgers lineup looks to be the one. The one wrinkle I didn’t predict is keeping GG on as DS while hiding her in serve receive.
|
|
|
|
Post by 25or624 on Oct 6, 2024 16:28:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tablealgebra on Oct 6, 2024 16:34:58 GMT -5
Honestly though, the first two sets were undoubtedly the best I’ve seen the badgers play this year taking all phases of play into account. I would have like to see them get punched back so we could see them respond, but while the huskies started to get on track in the third attacking wise, the rest of their play didn’t step up and give them much of a chance. This badgers lineup looks to be the one. The one wrinkle I didn’t predict is keeping GG on as DS while hiding her in serve receive. Honestly, I'm surprised they didn't implement it sooner. GG is still clearly our best "diggero", though Lola's improvement on getting to balls today was noticeable. |
|
|
|
Post by tablealgebra on Oct 6, 2024 16:39:22 GMT -5
we hit good today
(and covered good too, to knock out those errors)
|
|
|
|
Post by Wiswell on Oct 6, 2024 16:39:37 GMT -5
Trying to be optimistic, here. Washington set scores were 8; 14; 21. Given that trend-line, if this was best 4-out-of-7 sets we might have had a reverse sweep! Unless they lost 29-31. |
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Oct 6, 2024 16:55:54 GMT -5
Sheffield is not giving us anything to complain about I have one! In the third set, Washington was out of subs with the Badgers at about 19 or so (actually at 14 subs, but with no real way to use the 15th), and their left #18 Endsley was playing backrow. But we never served her. C'mon man, serve the player who doesn't usually do serve-receive! (No idea if she's any good at receive or not, but give it a try.) That's the 'best' I got. The rest was just outstanding play by the Badgers. Ok, that's a stretch  |
|
|
|
Post by volleybob on Oct 6, 2024 17:35:12 GMT -5
We done got stomped. Thought Fletcher and Haury played well. Am optimistic that Huskies will bounce back strong this Wednesday night against UCLA. We should certainly be hungry.
|
|
|
|
Post by allisonbadger on Oct 6, 2024 18:46:14 GMT -5
B1G+ says my password is wrong and when I try to change it it always says my passwords don't match?  The app is really particular this year. When I'm having trouble with my account, I usually clear my data and cache and that does the trick. |
|
