|
Post by vbcoltrane on Nov 9, 2024 17:16:36 GMT -5
Oddly, I think MN will follow this up by beating Oregon. Well, okay, then. But they haven't lost yet.
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Nov 9, 2024 17:23:13 GMT -5
Oddly, I think MN will follow this up by beating Oregon. Well, okay, then. But they haven't lost yet. well that's just not fair, bringing out the voodoo dolls.
|
|
|
Post by redbeard2008 on Nov 9, 2024 18:12:34 GMT -5
in progress Doing a close examination of the last 10 points in set 4 Shaffmaster was undoubtedly tired and her play quality deteriorated In the first two sets MN was awful in the terminal serving corner of the triangle Here the weakness was in transition: MN tied the score at 17s on a beautiful kill by Engeman after a nice 2.5? backset after a super save by Wa' Zoria WA went ahead at 18-17 when Shaff went wide to block line and left a seam for Endsley inside time to head to Pav to watch us beat Oregon..... to be continued Set 4 was tight, unlike Sets 1 and 2, where Minn blew big leads, with neither team leading by more than 2 through UW 19-17. The key turning point was when UW went on a 5-1 run from down 1 (15-16) to up 3 (20-17) - from that point on, UW was able to "hold serve" the rest of the way, with UM able to close it up to within a point, at 20-19 and 23-22, but not able to get even. From down 15-16, UW was almost error-free (6k/1e, 2bl, and an ace), while UM wasn't (6k/3e, 0bl, and 0sa).
|
|