|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 7, 2004 14:37:27 GMT -5
Apparently, Southern California voted predominantly for Bush and Northern California voted predominantly for Kerry. I had a feeling there were a lot of dumbarses in SoCal.
The whole state was roughly 55-45 for Kerry. I'm going by memory so my numbers may be off a tad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Nov 7, 2004 17:49:40 GMT -5
I'd say the dumbasses live up north.
|
|
|
|
Post by UCSBVball on Nov 7, 2004 20:43:26 GMT -5
If you remove LA County and the San Francisco area from the totals -- BUSH CARRIES CALIFORNIA
There are two large voting blocks that are the main constituency of the Democrats, without these two voting blocks Kerry would have carried Massachusetts only and be close in Rhode Island.
If the 2 voting blocks had been carried by the same margin as Bush carried the churchgoers, it looks as if NY would be close but for Bush.
|
|
|
|
Post by BonJoeV on Nov 9, 2004 13:45:28 GMT -5
[quote author=BiK link=board=news&thread=1099856247&start=1#0 date=1099867780]I'd say the dumbasses live up north.[/quote]
We're not all dumbasses. Some of us did cast our vote for W.
The morale Christian Right really concerns me though. We will see...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vball818 on Nov 9, 2004 18:07:55 GMT -5
Apparently, Southern California voted predominantly for Bush and Northern California voted predominantly for Kerry. I had a feeling there were a lot of dumbarses in SoCal. The whole state was roughly 55-45 for Kerry. I'm going by memory so my numbers may be off a tad. You may be right that there are a herd of So Cal residents who are nothing but stupid jack****s...what you've should've mention in your post were the particular counties in the So Cal region that did not vote for Sen Kerry and then your post would've made more sense. Anyway someone already beat me to the point that not all of the counties in So Cal voted for Prez Bush. |
|
