Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2004 14:00:13 GMT -5
This is for BiK (with the hope it means something to him). Pulitzer prizes for National reporting:1999 New York Times staff 2000 Wall Street Journal staff 2001 New York Times staff 2002 Washington Post staff 2003 Alan Miller and Kevin Sack (Los Angeles Times) 2004 Los Angeles Times staff Investigative reporting1999 The Miami Herald staff 2000 Sang-Hun Choe, Charles J. Hanley, and Martha Mendoza (Associated Press) 2001 David Willman (Los Angeles Times) 2002 Sari Horwitz, Scott Higham, and Sarah Cohen (Washington Post) 2003 Clifford J. Levy (New York Times) 2004 Michael D. Sallah, Mitch Weiss, and Joe Mahr (The Blade [Toledo, Ohio]) International reporting:1999 Wall Street Journal staff 2000 Mark Schoofs (The Village Voice [New York, N.Y.]) 2001 Ian Johnson (Wall Street Journal) and Paul Salopek (Chicago Tribune) 2002 Barry Bearak (New York Times) 2003 Kevin Sullivan and Mary Jordan (Washington Post) 2004 Anthony Shadid (Washington Post) And the 2003 Polk awards: www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0921773.html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2004 14:03:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Oct 28, 2004 16:48:55 GMT -5
New York Times Washington Post staff Los Angeles Times staff
This is a "who's who?" list of liberal media. Throw in the UK's toilet paper "the Guardian" and you can have yourself a Bush bashing liberal party.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2004 22:16:18 GMT -5
Exactly. What you call "liberal" media is what others seem to be calling the best.
What it comes down to is simple: if you are a responsible, respected newspaper, the Conservatives claim you have a liberal bias.
Now what does this say about those Conservatives?
C'mon, BiK. It's not about what side you're on. It's about who is attempting to report the Truth.
|
|
Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on Oct 28, 2004 23:34:55 GMT -5
Exactly. What you call "liberal" media is what others seem to be calling the best. What it comes down to is simple: if you are a responsible, respected newspaper, the Conservatives claim you have a liberal bias. Now what does this say about those Conservatives? C'mon, BiK. It's not about what side you're on. It's about who is attempting to report the Truth. The NY Times responsible - oh my, stop making me laugh - my sides are hurting. Next you'll tell me CBS News and 60 Minutes reporting is responsible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 28, 2004 23:59:22 GMT -5
Lwood! Where ya been? How ya been?
Still leaning right, I see...
|
|
Lwood
Sophomore
Go Lions!
Posts: 247
|
Post by Lwood on Oct 29, 2004 12:48:59 GMT -5
Lwood! Where ya been? How ya been? Still leaning right, I see... I've been good. Very busy - but doing well. Thanks for asking. Yes, I'm still leaning right. I just can't get excited by Kerry. I liked Howard Dean. He's a big time liberal - but I liked the fact that he was a governor and had strong convictions and I knew what his plan was. Kerry is just a liberal - I don't know what he really stands for and he has not told us his plan. Check out the poll I put up on VT.
|
|