|
|
Post by Gorf on May 31, 2004 7:33:00 GMT -5
Does GWB have so little to say about his own policies and plans that he continues at a record pace on negative (as well as misleading and outright lying) campaign attack ads on Kerry? www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5100453/Sure, you can claim that "all candidates" use negative attack ads against their opponents, however, in this year's campaign as well as in the 2000 campaign GWB uses those (with more outright lies as well) than any other presidential candidate ever has. I guess it goes to show what GWB thinks of his general national constituency that he believes they will believe his continued lies and less-than-half truths. Unfotunately, it appears that a large number of people actually do fall for his misleading ads. |
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on May 31, 2004 13:14:11 GMT -5
>-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=news&thread=1086006780&start=0#0 date=1086006780]Does GWB have so little to say about his own policies and plans that he continues at a record pace on negative (as well as misleading and outright lying) campaign attack ads on Kerry? You're one to talk. So far you haven't provided any type of Link to support Kerry without bashing Bush. When Bush is re-elected to another term, I'll smile a little bit harder knowing how pissed off you, (R)uffda and others will be. ;D |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2004 13:47:08 GMT -5
You're one to talk. So far you haven't provided any type of Link to support Kerry without bashing Bush. When Bush is re-elected to another term, I'll smile a little bit harder knowing how pissed off you, (R)uffda and others will be. ;D I think "despair" would be more the correct term. The man is a menace to the world, let alone our country. And I've never seen an Administration with more contempt for the intelligence of the American People. Just once I'd like to see someone from the White House tell the truth--about SOMETHING. Either they lie or they bury their meaning in nonsense: "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." And Condi says the President was not on alert for an al Qaeda attack in spite of the memo warning of just that because "it was not specific as to time, nor place, nor manner of attack." Damn those terrorists. They need to let us know exactly what they are up to! |
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Jun 1, 2004 0:53:32 GMT -5
You're one to talk. So far you haven't provided any type of Link to support Kerry without bashing Bush. When Bush is re-elected to another term, I'll smile a little bit harder knowing how pissed off you, (R)uffda and others will be. ;D I'm not a supporter of Kerry. I simply loathe GWB and his cronies. FWIW: That particular article DID support the evidence that GWB's camp is using far more negative (lying, and partial truth) attack ads than Kerry. FWIW2: When have you posted anything other than personal attacks, general useless rhetoric, and unfollowed up claims of "I'll get back to you on that"? |
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Jun 1, 2004 2:24:15 GMT -5
>-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=news&thread=1086006780&start=3#0 date=1086069212] I'm not a supporter of Kerry. But you will vote for him this coming November will you not? >-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=news&thread=1086006780&start=3#0 date=1086069212] FWIW: That particular article DID support the evidence that GWB's camp is using far more negative (lying, and partial truth) attack ads than Kerry. Bush has more Money is his campaign chest than Kerry. If Kerry had the money Bush had, he'd be doing the same thing. It's really not a morality issue. Kerry is just as much of a lying scumbag as you accuse Bush of being. >-(Gorf)-<[} link=board=news&thread=1086006780&start=3#0 date=1086069212] FWIW2: When have you posted anything other than personal attacks, general useless rhetoric, and unfollowed up claims of "I'll get back to you on that"? I'll get back to you.   |
|
|
|
Post by Gorf on Jun 1, 2004 10:13:56 GMT -5
But you will vote for him this coming November will you not? This I have not decided yet. If you bothered to read the article (or other similar source) you'd have known it isn't just based on sheer volume of dollars spent on ads, or the number of ads, but the percentage of ads as well. Bush "wins" in the negativity, lying, and partial truth race across all categories. Riiiiiiiiiiight... |
|
