|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Nov 4, 2004 15:56:29 GMT -5
[quote author= Mumsie[/b][/color] link=board=chitchat&thread=1099596223&start=14#0 date=1099601448] You and [glow=black,100,500]BonJoeV!... !...[/size] "GO VANDALS!!" [/glow][/i][/color] could have a duet![/quote] Is he alto or falsetto? Btw, there went the cat. ;D
|
|
|
Post by BonJoeV on Nov 4, 2004 16:29:57 GMT -5
[quote author= BiK link=board=chitchat&thread=1099596223&start=15#1 date=1099601789] Is he alto or falsetto? Btw, there went the cat. ;D[/quote] Piss on the cat.... I'm more of a baritone/bass. ;D www.expage.com/fluffling
|
|
|
Post by sonofbarcelonabob on Nov 4, 2004 17:51:48 GMT -5
Quick! You better delete these messages before people get wind of your alter ego, Mr.Forum Idaho admin boy. hahahah.... Haha. Wolfgang/Shepherd/Pick-a-dorkwad-boardname lecturing someone else on alter egos. Too frikkin' funny!
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 4, 2004 19:21:10 GMT -5
[quote author=IdahoBoy®® link=board=chitchat&thread=1099596223&start=6#0 date=1099596434]
Dude! You're sick.
Why are you replying to yourself?
By the way. I decided to give away a few copies of Rollshot since my last post. But "Shepherd" is your handle. [/quote]
This is what I'm talking about. This abuse of power. There are several things wrong with your post:
1. You, idahoboob, as the forum admin, can quickly check the IP address and other pertinent info about "Shepherd" to realize that I am not "Shepherd." Yet, you elect to just call me "sick" and argue I am "Shepherd." Yes, it's true "Shepherd" used to be my username but I haven't used that name in over 2 years! I certainly did not use it here. That's a gross misuse of power.
2. If I did post as "Shepherd," as you say I did, why would I try to discredit my own post?
3. You idahoboob, as the forum admin, are abusing your power by posing as idahoboob and incite-posting against a member, who is a constituent of the VolleyTalk.
4. You idahoboob, as the forum admin, probably (I can't prove it) registered as "Shepherd" to launch your own attack on me. Of course, that begs the question of why a forum admin would do this to his own constituent. Even if you are not "Shepherd," you could easily determine that I am not "Shepherd." I mean, you have that power, moron.
There is one way to prove whether Idahoboob posted as "Shepherd." Have your deputies check all the pertinent data on "Shepherd." Have them check its IP address against idahoboob's as well as mine, and I will guarantee the following: I am not "Shepherd." I will even guess that idahoboob is also "Shepherd." Go ahead. Have one of your deputies check it. I dare you.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 4, 2004 19:23:55 GMT -5
Haha. Wolfgang/Shepherd/Pick-a-dorkwad-boardname lecturing someone else on alter egos. Too frikkin' funny! All of those fit, except I was NOT "Shepherd" today. Also, you called me Mr. Paranoia-afraid-of-being-outed. See, this is where you stray. You got the wrong target. You should've been referring to Idahoboob except I guess, you didn't know it at the time. You are such a moron. Anyway, I tolerate you SlopBob because you are amusing in an Oh-look-at-that-poor-dog-lick-himself kind of way. So, I don't mind the insults. My day would not be complete without an insult from SlopBob.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 4, 2004 19:37:16 GMT -5
You should NEVER threaten to ban me just because I did not agree to converse with you via instant messenger. That is ridiculous.
A threat to ban someone is just as serious as an outright ban. You know, like attempted murder and murder have the same punishment.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 4, 2004 19:40:33 GMT -5
Whenever you ask me for a meeting or a private conference to resolve issues AND I accept it, just take it an run. Do NOT make more demands, like stupid instant messenger.
Whenever I ask for a meeting or a private conference, think about accepting it. I'm probably in a good mood and it's probably to our mutual benefit.
Your testosterone got the better of you.
|
|
|
Post by sonofbarcelonabob on Nov 4, 2004 20:16:32 GMT -5
All of those fit, except I was NOT "Shepherd" today. Also, you called me Mr. Paranoia-afraid-of-being-outed. See, this is where you stray. You got the wrong target. You should've been referring to Idahoboob except I guess, you didn't know it at the time. You are such a moron. Anyway, I tolerate you SlopBob because you are amusing in an Oh-look-at-that-poor-dog-lick-himself kind of way. So, I don't mind the insults. My day would not be complete without an insult from SlopBob. Wolfgeek, If you are so upset with the way Idadork is running the board, why did you hand the admin position over to him in the first place? You establish this elaborate charade that Roger Laccoco was a entirely different person from yourself, fooling no one. You have always been paranoid about being outed. So you hand over the admin to someone else and what is the first thing you do? You out them. You have some serious issues.
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Nov 5, 2004 2:44:50 GMT -5
This sounds like a soap opera with Wolfie as the drama queen.
This is ridiculous!
As far as being outed, I could care less. I'll tell everyone where they can find me at the SSC. I'll even submit a list of the most recent porn sites I have visited. Who gives a crap!
|
|
|
Post by 7thWoman on Nov 5, 2004 10:22:03 GMT -5
You establish this elaborate charade that Roger Laccoco was a entirely different person from yourself, fooling no one. I don't know, Roger seemed to be a much busier person than Wolfgang, and didn't he live in the San Diego area, whereas Wolfgang lives a bit more North? And since Wolfgang and IB have been fighting for so long, it seems pretty unlikely that he would have chosen IB for his successor. How about it Wolfgang, are you Roger?
|
|
|
Post by BonJoeV on Nov 5, 2004 11:12:31 GMT -5
[quote author= BiK link=board=chitchat&thread=1099596223&start=23#1 date=1099640690]This sounds like a soap opera with Wolfie as the drama queen. This is ridiculous! .....[/quote] No... This is just Wolfgang. If he wasn't up to this, he'd be up to something else. This is just his troll subject of the moment. Have some fun with it!
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 5, 2004 13:57:27 GMT -5
Wolfgeek, ... You establish this elaborate charade that Roger Laccoco was a entirely different person from yourself, fooling no one. You have always been paranoid about being outed. So you hand over the admin to someone else and what is the first thing you do? You out them. You have some serious issues. SlopBoob, I am not Roger Lacocco. If I were Roger, I probably would've banned your arse for all your trollish postings. And yet, you are still here. Imagine. With that said, if won't accept this answer, then there is nothing more I can say. There was no elaborate charade to hide my identity. In fact, ScumofBarbarinoVin, I think I was the very FIRST poster to comment in jest that Wolfgang=Roger a long time ago. I have also, in the past, commented that: Wolfgang=BIK Wolfgang=IdahoBoob Wolfgang=SongofBalihaiBob And when some poster asked "What kind of name is Roger Lacocco? It's kinda fruity." I then responded it was an undercover agent character (played by William Russ) in Wiseguy. And I was the only one who knew that, from what I could gather from the thread, which is not to say that others did NOT know except they did NOT post the answer. I have a lot of useless info in my head. Of course, you give me waaay too much credit. If indeed I was Roger, am I also ModJoe of the old Volleyball 24/7? That means, holy schmoly, I was at the center of the Volleyball-on-the-web Universe. Rollshot.com, Volleyball 24/7, AND VolleyTalk!! Imagine! I don't think so. I don't even take credit for Rolldork.com. I'm a nobody, like you.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 5, 2004 14:00:27 GMT -5
How about it Wolfgang, are you Roger? No. See my response post to SonofSam above.
|
|
|
Post by chancelucky on Nov 5, 2004 14:27:49 GMT -5
Why do I feel like I'm reading the volleyball version of the John Cusack movie Identity?
Roger Ebert recently reviewed the movie I Heart Huckabees by telling the story of seeing it at a screening. As soon as the movie was over, the person next to him, part of being Roger Ebert, is that this has to happen whenever he goes to a movie, asked "Well, what did you think?"
Ebert replied, "I'll want to see it a second time before I know."
"You mean you liked it that much?"
Ebert: No, I'll have to see it a second time before I'll even know if I can like it or dislike it. One viewing isn't enough to let me make up my mind.
This whole post-modernist bit about internet voices floating freely from the humans who type things into their computers, mysterious administrators of this miniverse, anonymity as identity..or is it multiple identity as the ultimate form of anonymity and hence freedom? .I can't decide if I find it funny, clever, or either stupid or something I should be alerting internet mental health services about to put these folk on 72 hour observation for "danger to this board and others." I find myself reading it, just because I want to know if I either find this funny or disturbing.
I do know what Sherwood Anderson probably would have said. Winesburg might have been a literary world where all the characters were tied up in some way by repressed emotion and unexpressed longing. This web-based one is just the opposite where the emotions and thoughts seem to fly freely without actual humans to tie them to. Having seen this, he might well have moved back to Winesburg next door to George and told his neighbors, "Just be as repressed as you want as long as I still know where you live and what your name is."
As Shakespear wrote in his undiscovered play George the Younger, "Let's legislate away all the lawyers."
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on Nov 5, 2004 15:24:06 GMT -5
... I do know what Sherwood Anderson probably would have said. Winesburg might have been a literary world where all the characters were tied up in some way by repressed emotion and unexpressed longing. ... Some people, and I know one in particular, won't get your "Winesburg, Ohio" reference.
|
|