Hey R..!

[Wolfgang]

These threads with meaningless and unhelpful titles...well, they're meaningless and unhelpful. Please edit the title to help our readers understand the kernel, the driving point, the meat, of the discussion. Thank you.

[Deleted]

I replied line by line so here's my challenge to you.

I posted the reason why all this talk about BECK and BILL ..and Ann and Rush is to deflect info about OBAMA'S failings..
Keep the eye off the ball ..so to speak.

OK. But we need to agree at the start that this is your opinion, an opinion for which you have provided no proof.

So answer me this..as provided on MEET THE PRESS ..today.

FEB 16 th ..this year, OBAMA got his PLAN rushed through, the unread Stimuli's package done..without Republican bi partisan support.

The unemployment # was 7.6 %..FACT.
What is it Today?

9-something, probably 10-something in fact. Do you know what it would have been *without* the stimulus package? Do you think, for instance, it would have gone down? Stayed the same? Risen the same? Risen *more*??

You don’t. (And I don’t either, but I’d suspect most economists would say it would have risen more.)

Bonus round ..2x your points..what was the national debt then and now?

gee why does CHRIS on hardball stay focused on Palin?
and ROVE?
That's just 1 question...lumped together..

I don’t make a habit of watching Hardball – I rarely watch it, as a matter of fact. I have no doubt he talks about Palin and Rove. I doubt very much it is his “focus”. I’m sure he has plenty of other worthless topics to discuss. Who cares? Your implication is that Chris Matthews works for the Obama administration? That his job is all about deflecting attention from Obama’s “failures”?

No chance.

So that is just 3 simple little questions..

So lets play more...See if you really watch Beck..or just let others form your opinion..

Obama stated before and after the election.."that he would sit down and meet" with whom?
Multiple choice..to make it easier for you..
a. The Pope..
B. The Terror leaders..IRAN ,North KOREA..and so on..
c. The English..
d. The Russians..
e. all of the above.. ( my fav.)

..a trick question..? or multiple answers?

Your point being??

Next ..

What did the meetings with North Korea cause to happen?
a. reduce the tension..
B. increase the tension..
c. Create world peace.
D. cause NK to test another nuclear device and Launce more missile test..

look for helpful hints to Help ..

Ah. You are against talking to our “enemies”. Fine. There’s no proof that this policy (ignoring our enemies) has ever worked – actually plenty of proof to the contrary.

Others can play along..but the post is for R first ..no cheating to help him..his other personalities cannot play ..

Let's see if he will answer why CRIS and Media Matters go after the conservatives...

That’s it?? Hardball is a silly show. It’s all about Matthews bullying the people he interviews. He does it to both parties. It’s not propaganda, however, like Beck and Hannity.

Media Matters *exists* to monitor conservative media and hold it accountable for what it presents. Is this “going after conservatives”? I suppose you could look at it that way. But the more accurate way to look at it is that they are fact-checking the propaganda coming from Rupert Murdoch and his ilk.

When you can come up with *anything* Media Matters has put out there that was purely propaganda – i.e., made-up – please do.

[lonewolf]

Aug 2, 2009 18:55:07 GMT -5 goGopherBill said:

This is my opinion..
THERE.
Your first answer was correct Between 9.5 and 10.
and this is with a stimulus?
Your other rubbish is just YOUR OPINION ..no facts to back up any assumption other than the fact the stimulus stimulated nothing but debt.

You're ranting and yelling at Ruffda when he specifically pointed out that he doesn't know what would have happened(where the unemployment% would be) without the stimulus package.

Thank you for your comprehension.