|
|
Post by shockjock on Aug 12, 2009 10:10:31 GMT -5
"The best mirror is an old friend."
|
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on Aug 12, 2009 16:02:19 GMT -5
Don't be shy, shockjock, tell us how you really feel about the Bush family being friends with Adolf Hitler?
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 12, 2009 16:26:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 12, 2009 16:27:40 GMT -5
Btw, chipNdink, I'm really getting tired of showing this board how dumb you are.
|
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on Aug 13, 2009 0:46:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 13, 2009 0:57:32 GMT -5
Oh, gosh, you got me. I'm so embarassed. I mean, here I am posting up a link from the Anti-Deflamation League, a recognized international organization founded in 1913. And you trumped me by posting a link that quotes Pinky and the Brain on their homepage.
How will I ever live down this shame?
|
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on Aug 13, 2009 1:08:32 GMT -5
... How will I ever live down this shame? You could start by trying to refute the information in the New Hampshire Gazette articles, which are fully documented and referenced. The "supposed" refutation you linked to contains absolutely no documentation or references. It doesn't even have a byline of any person willing to owe up to that "opinion" posted by you. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 13, 2009 2:12:56 GMT -5
... How will I ever live down this shame? You could start by trying to refute the information in the New Hampshire Gazette articles, which are fully documented and referenced. The "supposed" refutation you linked to contains absolutely no documentation or references. It doesn't even have a byline of any person willing to owe up to that "opinion" posted by you. Pinky and the Brain, 'nuff said. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 13, 2009 2:22:20 GMT -5
... How will I ever live down this shame? You could start by trying to refute the information in the New Hampshire Gazette articles, which are fully documented and referenced. The "supposed" refutation you linked to contains absolutely no documentation or references. It doesn't even have a byline of any person willing to owe up to that "opinion" posted by you. And, by your request, Buchanan debunked: hnn.us/articles/1811.htmlConcluding paragraph in the article: What all this means for the reputation of Prescott Bush's descendants should be as relevant as Joseph P. Kennedy’s for his descendants, just as it was for the connection of the Dulleses with Sullivan and Cromwell. Similar associations did not keep John Foster Dulles from becoming secretary of state or his brother Allen from heading the C.I.A. Nor did it stop Averell Harriman from becoming governor of New York. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 13, 2009 2:24:40 GMT -5
... How will I ever live down this shame? You could start by trying to refute the information in the New Hampshire Gazette articles, which are fully documented and referenced. The "supposed" refutation you linked to contains absolutely no documentation or references. It doesn't even have a byline of any person willing to owe up to that "opinion" posted by you. OMG, Bush was a Nazi sympathizer, and the only news source in the WHOLE FRIGGIN' COUNTRY that found this out was one podunk newspaper from New Hampshire. Gawd, it totally has to be true. |
|
|
|
Post by shockjock on Aug 13, 2009 10:25:52 GMT -5
News Flash!
Bush is not Relevant anymore, Presidential history,
no vote, no veto, It's his library time.
Mr. Obama is Relevant, in-charge of guiding our country's future.
His words and policies have influence. Any of the radical influences he got from his old Friends and pals would not be main stream America.
These friends of his in the U-Tube video are just off the charts going way to the left.
Since he was elected in a love-fest of coverage, the press basically blew-off any negative issues about Obama.
Hey, Mr. Obama won! The Obots got their pick elected!
So now we just want to understand
more about the man, our President, the Obama! Is that asking to much?
Or do you believe in Blind faith?
|
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on Aug 13, 2009 12:28:31 GMT -5
You could start by trying to refute the information in the New Hampshire Gazette articles, which are fully documented and referenced. The "supposed" refutation you linked to contains absolutely no documentation or references. It doesn't even have a byline of any person willing to owe up to that "opinion" posted by you. And, by your request, Buchanan debunked: hnn.us/articles/1811.htmlConcluding paragraph in the article: What all this means for the reputation of Prescott Bush's descendants should be as relevant as Joseph P. Kennedy’s for his descendants, just as it was for the connection of the Dulleses with Sullivan and Cromwell. Similar associations did not keep John Foster Dulles from becoming secretary of state or his brother Allen from heading the C.I.A. Nor did it stop Averell Harriman from becoming governor of New York. Wow, you should really learn to read GSBB, not only did the article you point to NOT debunk Buchanan, it corroborated almost everything he said. The concluding paragraph you quote merely points out that past sins have not kept others from achieving power either. Duh. |
|
|
|
Post by chipNdink on Aug 13, 2009 12:37:51 GMT -5
News Flash!
Bush is not Relevant anymore, Presidential history, no vote, no veto, It's his library time. Mr. Obama is Relevant, in-charge of guiding our country's future. His words and policies have influence. Any of the radical influences he got from his old Friends and pals would not be main stream America. These friends of his in the U-Tube video are just off the charts going way to the left. Since he was elected in a love-fest of coverage, the press basically blew-off any negative issues about Obama. Hey, Mr. Obama won! The Obots got their pick elected! So now we just want to understand more about the man, our President, the Obama! Is that asking to much? Or do you believe in Blind faith? No, I'm merely point out, as GSBB has done as well with his quote from Prof. Parmet, that past associations with dubious characters have not prevented many people from rising to power. Your nitkpicking about Obama's past associations is neither unique nor unprecedented in relative comparison to the past associations of many others. |
|
|
|
Post by lonewolf on Aug 13, 2009 14:03:42 GMT -5
News Flash!
Bush is not Relevant anymore, Presidential history, no vote, no veto, It's his library time. Mr. Obama is Relevant, in-charge of guiding our country's future. His words and policies have influence. Any of the radical influences he got from his old Friends and pals would not be main stream America. These friends of his in the U-Tube video are just off the charts going way to the left. Since he was elected in a love-fest of coverage, the press basically blew-off any negative issues about Obama. Hey, Mr. Obama won! The Obots got their pick elected! So now we just want to understand more about the man, our President, the Obama! Is that asking to much? Or do you believe in Blind faith? No, I'm merely point out, as GSBB has done as well with his quote from Prof. Parmet, that past associations with dubious characters have not prevented many people from rising to power. Your nitkpicking about Obama's past associations is neither unique nor unprecedented in relative comparison to the past associations of many others. You're wasting your time Chip...you're statement is neither posted on one of the two sites shockjock reads, nor broadcasted by Fox...he'll simply ignore it, or not believe it. |
|
|
|
Post by bunnywailer on Aug 13, 2009 15:48:07 GMT -5
Don't be shy, shockjock, tell us how you really feel about the Bush family being friends with Adolf Hitler? So, despite all your wasted rhetoric on this thread, you still haven't proved your original statement. |
|
