Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2016 0:31:37 GMT -5
Does anyone know if there have been any talks about men's sand programs?
|
|
|
|
Post by ciscokeed on May 23, 2016 8:12:24 GMT -5
I think title 1X continues to be the main issue. If your school has football its basically impossible to add any men's sport. Could only see this happening at the NAIA level
|
|
|
|
Post by TheReignman on May 23, 2016 9:55:46 GMT -5
It will probably never make it as NCAA Varsity sport. But keep an eye on its development as a club sport
|
|
|
|
Post by ardatak on May 23, 2016 17:58:04 GMT -5
Nope. They have to make up for all those men's football scholarships. So they cut other men's sports to make sure they're giving out equal scholarships.
|
|
|
|
Post by gr8ful on May 24, 2016 12:09:08 GMT -5
Nope. They have to make up for all those men's football scholarships. So they cut other men's sports to make sure they're giving out equal scholarships. It's unfortunate how the NCAA dictates its policies. I understand football and basketball bring in the bulk of the money for universities and there needs to be "equality", blah, blah, blah, but the system as a whole needs to be overhauled and changed…..just my two cents |
|
|
|
Post by Not Me on May 24, 2016 15:50:13 GMT -5
It's unfortunate how people randomly blame the NCAA for things out of their control.
Individual schools control what sports they add
|
|
|
|
Post by gr8ful on May 24, 2016 18:03:50 GMT -5
It's unfortunate how people randomly blame the NCAA for things out of their control. Individual schools control what sports they add Ummmm, not very random - individual schools look at the bottom line and the money involved….where do they get the bulk of their funding, AND there does have to be proportional equity between men and women's sports, so any university is going to look at the bottom-line of what the cost is versus ROI…..this is obviously a cut and paste: chools choose to support, eliminate or reduce particular sports opportunities on both men's and women's specific teams for a variety of reasons, including varying interests in specific sports and choices about how to allocate budget resources among the sports teams the school decides to sponsor or emphasize. The number, competitive level and quality of sports programs are individual institutional decisions, just as the number and quality of academic programs are institutional prerogatives. for more information please review Titl IX….. but I do like your unfortunate lack of education |
|
|
|
Post by newenglander on Jun 7, 2016 7:34:14 GMT -5
After a little bit of thought... D3 was a big growth avenue for men's VB (get 12-15 players paying for tuition and inexpensively offer sponsor men's vb).
Could it happen for beach? Smaller squad sizes, lots of D3 schools in cold weather climates.
Don't see it...
|
|
|
|
Post by rockhopper on Jun 7, 2016 11:45:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by gobears on Jun 7, 2016 13:46:36 GMT -5
At our school I would like to dup men's T & F and add indoor vball men's.
then we can go after m sand.
And with Big West adding m vb as a conference sport they can maybe ficus as well on sand in the bear future.a bunch of west and south schools likely already have sand courts.
No reason not to add mvb sand as a clu sport meanwhile.
Big changes coming in mvb
|
|
