|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on May 9, 2017 23:31:40 GMT -5
is it a fact that she doesn't currently have a partner? That's what she said on national TV. Your choice whether you believe her. As of today, she does not have a partner.
|
|
|
Post by guest2 on May 11, 2017 16:20:55 GMT -5
Well, the NVL was probably banking on a mass exodus from the AVP when players got fed up and left. That did not happen in the slightest. All they got was Walsh-Jennings, who still doesn't have a partner. Its a bit hard to see how they could get more events during this year just by banking on one player. Just because players played in the 1st AVP doesn't mean they can't play NVL. If they do, they just can't go back to the AVP. I havent seen the contract so if you have please correct me, but only an idiot wouldn't have protected themself against this contingency. A lawyer who passed the bar yesterday would have built in exclusivity with teeth so that players can't just leave and not come back.
|
|
|
Post by JB Southpaw on May 12, 2017 6:59:49 GMT -5
Just because players played in the 1st AVP doesn't mean they can't play NVL. If they do, they just can't go back to the AVP. I havent seen the contract so if you have please correct me, but only an idiot wouldn't have protected themself against this contingency. A lawyer who passed the bar yesterday would have built in exclusivity with teeth so that players can't just leave and not come back. from what has been posted, the exclusivity was built in, along with the consequences, 4 yr. ban. Plus, if it's 4 players, would the AVP spend the legal fees to execute the agreement?? it's across state lines too, it'd be a mess.
|
|