Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:37:55 GMT -5
Also a lot of you guys might not have noticed but the Missouri Valley is back IN Right after Lily Johnson graduates... |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 18:42:32 GMT -5
Also a lot of you guys might not have noticed but the Missouri Valley is back IN Right after Lily Johnson graduates... yo, we still waiting on your vote so we can start scheming! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:45:08 GMT -5
Also a message to the new league members: please ask any questions if something is unclear now. Especially with the draft. It holds up the process alot. And when you make a pick, please TRIPLE check they are from an eligible conference. Okay, so some of the questions seem like there are legitimate pros/cons for/against each of them, and a reason why each of them is on the ballot. Is there a way to educate us new guys on why a proposed rule change might or might not be a good idea? ay kinda did that a few pages ago, but I don't really understand how each of them will affect the game. But, for now: 1. #2 2. YES BONUS (smh  ) 3. NO H2H - this would be completely dependent on the active players that someone decides to make active for that week, yes? 4. NO FRESHMAN 5. YES WILDCARD 6. YES MINIMUM TEAM ROSTER 7. NO SUPER WEEK |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:45:23 GMT -5
Right after Lily Johnson graduates... yo, we still waiting on your vote so we can start scheming! I CAN ONLY POST SO FAST |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:49:14 GMT -5
Actually donut I did do it like double Trojan. My username still remained the same. Fight On! Professional ***** doubletrojan ^^^ he put "doubletrojan" (his old username) here, versus in parenthesis after his name. A mod must've done that. Users can't add custom titles AFAIK. Just signatures and statuses. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 18:49:15 GMT -5
Also a message to the new league members: please ask any questions if something is unclear now. Especially with the draft. It holds up the process alot. And when you make a pick, please TRIPLE check they are from an eligible conference. Okay, so some of the questions seem like there are legitimate pros/cons for/against each of them, and a reason why each of them is on the ballot. Is there a way to educate us new guys on why a proposed rule change might or might not be a good idea? ay kinda did that a few pages ago, but I don't really understand how each of them will affect the game. But, for now: 1. #3-HYBRID 2. NO BONUS 3. NO H2H - this would be completely dependent on the active players that someone decides to make active for that week, yes? 4. NO FRESHMAN 5. YES WILDCARD 6. YES MINIMUM TEAM ROSTER 7. NO SUPER WEEK Re question 3 Question 3: Should the first tie-breaker, no matter the system, always be Head-To-Head result before the set records? (This refers to League Standings. Say two teams are 10-3. Should the first tie-breaker always be the H2H result? Or, if using POINT system, say two teams have 38 points each. Should the first tie-breaker be H2H result?) It has nothing to do with the active roster, it's entirely about how we determine standings in the league after every week. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 18:54:27 GMT -5
I'd like to make a clarifying point/opinion. Re the scoring system on question 1, option 3 really is NOT a hybrid of the two, it's a tie beaker procedure. I'm indifferent if people want to keep the current scoring system, but I just want to point out that voting for #3 IS keeping the current scoring system, which is that it's winner take all each week. The whole point of the points scoring was to keep the losers of the closer contests in the heat of standings with the ability to possibly still win come week 13 (keeping people as engaged as possible). Voting for option #3 is NOT changing how we score week to week to determine standings, and it only actually matters at the very end to determine the final standings. I just want to make sure everyone is aware of that. In fact, given that question 3 has already past the vote, which is that head to head is the first tie breaker no matter the system, choosing option #3 "hybrid" means even less! The only way it would come into play is if after all the season is over, someone is tied in the overall standings using the old scoring model (accumulated head to head results), and THOSE two posters tied each other during their matchup..... or maybe I'm reading this wrong. all I know is that we should be clear what we are voting on when it comes to scoring.........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:54:50 GMT -5
Okay, so some of the questions seem like there are legitimate pros/cons for/against each of them, and a reason why each of them is on the ballot. Is there a way to educate us new guys on why a proposed rule change might or might not be a good idea? ay kinda did that a few pages ago, but I don't really understand how each of them will affect the game. But, for now: 1. #3-HYBRID 2. NO BONUS 3. NO H2H - this would be completely dependent on the active players that someone decides to make active for that week, yes? 4. NO FRESHMAN 5. YES WILDCARD 6. YES MINIMUM TEAM ROSTER 7. NO SUPER WEEK Re question 3 Question 3: Should the first tie-breaker, no matter the system, always be Head-To-Head result before the set records? (This refers to League Standings. Say two teams are 10-3. Should the first tie-breaker always be the H2H result? Or, if using POINT system, say two teams have 38 points each. Should the first tie-breaker be H2H result?) It has nothing to do with the active roster, it's entirely about how we determine standings in the league after every week. Yes, but my H2H result against that player would be dependent on the active roster for that week, right? For example, let's say you and I were both 10-3, and you won the H2H match-up, but that was when I had to sit Plummer (or whoever my "big gun" might've been) on the week when Stanford was playing the desert schools (or something). You'd win the tiebreaker. Or, could I make my "big gun" active every single week?? I feel dumb |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:56:31 GMT -5
I'd like to make a clarifying point/opinion. Re the scoring system on question 1, option 3 really is NOT a hybrid of the two, it's a tie beaker procedure. I'm indifferent if people want to keep the current scoring system, but I just want to point out that voting for #3 IS keeping the current scoring system, which is that it's winner take all each week. The whole points of the points scoring was to keep the losers of the closer contests in the heat of standings with the ability to possibly still win come week 13 (keeping people as engaged as possible). Voting for option #3 is NOT changing how we score week to week to determine standings, and it only actually matters at the very end to determine the final standings. I just want to make sure everyone is aware of that. Oh then I want #2. Whatever keeps the loser from falling too far behind. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 18:56:37 GMT -5
Re question 3 Question 3: Should the first tie-breaker, no matter the system, always be Head-To-Head result before the set records? (This refers to League Standings. Say two teams are 10-3. Should the first tie-breaker always be the H2H result? Or, if using POINT system, say two teams have 38 points each. Should the first tie-breaker be H2H result?) It has nothing to do with the active roster, it's entirely about how we determine standings in the league after every week. Yes, but my H2H result against that player would be dependent on the active roster for that week, right? For example, let's say you and I were both 10-3, and you won the H2H match-up, but that was when I had to sit Plummer (or whoever my "big gun" might've been) on the week when Stanford was playing the desert schools (or something). You'd win the tiebreaker. Or, could I make my "big gun" active every single week?? I feel dumb There are no caveats in the scoring....if I win against you during our week, and we both are tied in the standings, I get ranked ahead of you, period. Oh and don't worry, at draft spot #14, you won't be getting Plummer.  |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 18:57:12 GMT -5
I'd like to make a clarifying point/opinion. Re the scoring system on question 1, option 3 really is NOT a hybrid of the two, it's a tie beaker procedure. I'm indifferent if people want to keep the current scoring system, but I just want to point out that voting for #3 IS keeping the current scoring system, which is that it's winner take all each week. The whole points of the points scoring was to keep the losers of the closer contests in the heat of standings with the ability to possibly still win come week 13 (keeping people as engaged as possible). Voting for option #3 is NOT changing how we score week to week to determine standings, and it only actually matters at the very end to determine the final standings. I just want to make sure everyone is aware of that. Oh then I want #2. Whatever keeps the loser from falling too far behind. great!...then change your vote in your post please. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 18:59:25 GMT -5
Oh then I want #2. Whatever keeps the loser from falling too far behind. great!...then change your vote in your post please. Okay do you want me to change any others |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2018 19:00:35 GMT -5
Yes, but my H2H result against that player would be dependent on the active roster for that week, right? For example, let's say you and I were both 10-3, and you won the H2H match-up, but that was when I had to sit Plummer (or whoever my "big gun" might've been) on the week when Stanford was playing the desert schools (or something). You'd win the tiebreaker. Or, could I make my "big gun" active every single week?? I feel dumb Oh and don't worry, at draft spot #14, you won't be getting Plummer.  |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Jul 21, 2018 19:04:45 GMT -5
Oh then I want #2. Whatever keeps the loser from falling too far behind. great!...then change your vote in your post please. lol.... you can make up your own mind....the rest aren't that difficult to deduce. I'm mostly indifferent about these rules tbh. but I do think that IF we are going to the points model, the weekly bonus points to the team with the highest totals in each scoring category makes the leaderboard even more intriguing. |
|
|
|
Post by vup on Jul 21, 2018 19:05:19 GMT -5
Edit: 1) #2 POINTS 2) NO BONUS 3) YES H2H 4) YES FRESHMAN 5) YES WILDCARD 6) YES MINIMUM ROSTER 7) YES ON SUPER WEEK |
|
)
