Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2018 18:37:17 GMT -5
I noticed that if UH recruits a lefty, the(UH) would have another offensive weapon in the front row?
|
|
|
Post by kenhiraihnl on Oct 22, 2018 14:20:57 GMT -5
I hope RAMS has Tayli Ikenaga, Moanalua HS 5’5” OH (not a typo) on her radar. She’s only a Sophomore but is a 6-rotation who could be one of the best DS to come from that school.
|
|
|
Post by practicesafesets on Oct 23, 2018 10:47:51 GMT -5
I hope RAMS has Tayli Ikenaga, Moanalua HS 5’5” OH (not a typo) on her radar. She’s only a Sophomore but is a 6-rotation who could be one of the best DS to come from that school. Tayli played for Robyn’s club team. Judging from video, Tayli looks quick but many of her passes look too horizontal and or have a spin on the ball. She’s only a sophomore so maybe she can improve.
|
|
|
Post by kenhiraihnl on Oct 24, 2018 18:41:43 GMT -5
I hope RAMS has Tayli Ikenaga, Moanalua HS 5’5” OH (not a typo) on her radar. She’s only a Sophomore but is a 6-rotation who could be one of the best DS to come from that school. Tayli played for Robyn’s club team. Judging from video, Tayli looks quick but many of her passes look too horizontal and or have a spin on the ball. She’s only a sophomore so maybe she can improve. ...and she has the GPA to enroll in UH premed ala Clare-Marie Anderson.
|
|
|
Post by Timeless on Oct 24, 2018 20:14:31 GMT -5
The more the merrier with DS. heck i don't know why teams dont carry over 10 DS on a team, if you can save a scholarship and have them all battling it out for a position, maybe one of them could be an akiu
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Oct 24, 2018 22:48:54 GMT -5
No we don't need an influx of DS's taking up space on the roster, like how Dave used to do. He had around 6-7 DS's players on the roster that made no impact and barely saw the court. Robyn would be better off filling those spots with offensive players that will play and make an impact.
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Oct 24, 2018 22:50:22 GMT -5
I noticed that if UH recruits a lefty, the(UH) would have another offensive weapon in the front row? Huh? What is this suppose to mean? Wouldn't a right hander be just as much an offensive weapon as a lefty? This makes no sense what are you trying to say?
|
|
|
Post by baytree on Oct 24, 2018 23:09:07 GMT -5
No we don't need an influx of DS's taking up space on the roster, like how Dave used to do. He had around 6-7 DS's players on the roster that made no impact and barely saw the court. Robyn would be better off filling those spots with offensive players that will play and make an impact. Or at least push the other players on the team. E.g., it's good to have Ross battling with Castillo for playing time even if Ross never plays much. I agree that too many players at one position just dilutes things. What's the point of a third libero? Better for the team/coaches to focus their energies on other things.
|
|
|
Post by Timeless on Oct 24, 2018 23:09:54 GMT -5
No we don't need an influx of DS's taking up space on the roster, like how Dave used to do. He had around 6-7 DS's players on the roster that made no impact and barely saw the court. Robyn would be better off filling those spots with offensive players that will play and make an impact. why is there a limit on how many players can be on a team? I know 10 is outrageous but a better chance one is a standout then 6-7
|
|
|
Post by baytree on Oct 24, 2018 23:12:26 GMT -5
No we don't need an influx of DS's taking up space on the roster, like how Dave used to do. He had around 6-7 DS's players on the roster that made no impact and barely saw the court. Robyn would be better off filling those spots with offensive players that will play and make an impact. why is there a limit on how many players can be on a team? I know 10 is outrageous but a better chance one is a standout then 6-7 There's not a limit on roster size but there is a limit on coaches' time. And also players' time. Why should the libero or OHs have to get used to covering the court with several different DSes? It's better for them to spend time playing with the DS that will be in the games. And the coaches have to coach them as well as make sure that they comply with the rules and meet academic requirements, etc.
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Oct 25, 2018 0:05:06 GMT -5
No we don't need an influx of DS's taking up space on the roster, like how Dave used to do. He had around 6-7 DS's players on the roster that made no impact and barely saw the court. Robyn would be better off filling those spots with offensive players that will play and make an impact. why is there a limit on how many players can be on a team? I know 10 is outrageous but a better chance one is a standout then 6-7 What is the point of having 10 DS's on a team? With that many on a team that is fewer reps each one will get. Would you keep 5 setters on a team? Probably not. You only keep the necessary amount of players you need. To challenge in practice and that can make an impact when put into the game. Why would you keep extra players that is taking away precious reps and practice time for other players on the team
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2018 0:18:19 GMT -5
why is there a limit on how many players can be on a team? I know 10 is outrageous but a better chance one is a standout then 6-7 What is the point of having 10 DS's on a team? With that many on a team that is fewer reps each one will get. Would you keep 5 setters on a team? Probably not. You only keep the necessary amount of players you need. To challenge in practice and that can make an impact when put into the game. Why would you keep extra players that is taking away precious reps and practice time for other players on the team One does Not stockpile DS'es: as in, if one has so many, that will "morph" into having 1 good one. You Recruit an all-around athlete; who, if shorter, can do a bang-up job!
|
|
|
Post by Timeless on Oct 25, 2018 0:29:53 GMT -5
you're missing the context in my post. i already said its much to have 10 DS's on a team but if they are quality why not? It's not like they are an outside hitter and have to do everything, they have just have to dig and pass an occasionally set. So its really not about reps, as you can practice on your own or with other DS's. Also im sure there open invites to practice with the team and eventually most of them do get cut before the season starts
|
|
|
Post by kolohekeiki on Oct 25, 2018 1:25:20 GMT -5
you're missing the context in my post. i already said its much to have 10 DS's on a team but if they are quality why not? It's not like they are an outside hitter and have to do everything, they have just have to dig and pass an occasionally set. So its really not about reps, as you can practice on your own or with other DS's. Also im sure there open invites to practice with the team and eventually most of them do get cut before the season starts No I'm not missing the point of your post. You are missing the point of the concept. What is the point in keeping that much on a roster regardless if they are "quality" or not. What purpose does it serve to have that many DS's on a roster plain and simple? Again would you keep five setters on a roster even if they are all quality? NO! It does come down to reps and practice time because the more people you have on your roster, in the gym, the less reps, court time and practice time each player will get. They can practice on their own? Really which of these players at the collegiate level "practices" on their own. Between practices, strength training, and school do you think they are going to go out and practice on their own. These are college kids they are going to use that spare time for studies/homework, social and recreational activities, not to practice on their own.
|
|
|
Post by Timeless on Oct 25, 2018 1:52:45 GMT -5
you're missing the context in my post. i already said its much to have 10 DS's on a team but if they are quality why not? It's not like they are an outside hitter and have to do everything, they have just have to dig and pass an occasionally set. So its really not about reps, as you can practice on your own or with other DS's. Also im sure there open invites to practice with the team and eventually most of them do get cut before the season starts No I'm not missing the point of your post. You are missing the point of the concept. What is the point in keeping that much on a roster regardless if they are "quality" or not. What purpose does it serve to have that many DS's on a roster plain and simple? Again would you keep five setters on a roster even if they are all quality? NO! It does come down to reps and practice time because the more people you have on your roster, in the gym, the less reps, court time and practice time each player will get. They can practice on their own? Really which of these players at the collegiate level "practices" on their own. Between practices, strength training, and school do you think they are going to go out and practice on their own. These are college kids they are going to use that spare time for studies/homework, social and recreational activities, not to practice on their own. i already said 10 is too much and i was being sarcastic in saying that from the beginning. As for having 5 setters on a team, that is different. Setters are more skilled players than DS's and you would want to have more reps and court time with LESS players. DS's only job is to pass and dig, so why does it hutt to have more? whats so wrong about it they don't count as a scholarship player nor do they count as a sub for BR player.
|
|