|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 20:39:51 GMT -5
Nebraska had overcame the non-rally points?
What about the idea that Stanford overcame the more typical, more complicated rally points that Nebraska won more of?
If there weren’t any non-rally points, Nebraska wouldn’t have to overcome anything. If there weren’t any rally points, the score would be like 17-10 in set 1.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 20:49:09 GMT -5
"Rally points." What a worthless designation. IMHO.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:05:33 GMT -5
You will never admit it, but you haven't made a single argument other than it's too complicated, everyone else's arguments are wrong, and everyone is terribly rude except for you. The truth is you haven't come up with any of your own ideas and you don't want to do anything besides rudely tell others they are wrong. As I said: exaggerate, lecture, obfuscate. Everything is a complete mischaracterization of my position. On purpose. You have a career ahead of you in politics, if you want one. If your position now is, "You haven't even made a single argument," I can't win because you're now blatantly lying. You're the KellyAnne Conway of VT and she can't be beat.
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 21:06:25 GMT -5
"Rally points." What a worthless designation. IMHO. Personally I agree too. I think while it’s accurate, it’s kinda silly. But the concept is true. Aces and service errors eliminate all the other factors in the game. Nebraska hit better, dug the same, blocked nearly the same. All the other aspects of the game were very similar, except one glaring stat. It’d be dumb to dismiss that one glaring stat as meaningless. But yes, the term non-rally and rally points are silly. Every point is a rally, some just end quicker than others.
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 21:07:05 GMT -5
Shhhh, what is your position?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:11:01 GMT -5
"Rally points." What a worthless designation. IMHO. Personally I agree too. I think while it’s accurate, it’s kinda silly. But the concept is true. Aces and service errors eliminate all the other factors in the game. Nebraska hit better, dug the same, blocked nearly the same. All the other aspects of the game were very similar, except one glaring stat. It’d be dumb to dismiss that one glaring stat as meaningless. But yes, the term non-rally and rally points are silly. Every point is a rally, some just end quicker than others. Yes, but the REASON for their end is not the same. And, very often, the reason was the serve. Either its effectiveness or its lack thereof.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:19:44 GMT -5
So now we can only look at set 1 only after 21-19? Anything before that is irrelevant. Just like anything before 9-9 in set 5 is less meaningful. Aces early in the game mean less than aces at the end of games. We need boxscores to be updated with these more important and timely stats before we can debate the results of games... In terms of things you can control and practice, the service line game (in this Championship match, for example), is going to be one of Coach Cook's biggest takeaways (not sure how much he can "work on it" though, considering Nebraska is usually the best serve-receive team in the country, but that's besides the point). I truly wonder about this. Several of those Stanford aces just happened to paint the line. Nothing you can get better at there. I think there's prolly a laundry list of things he knows will need to improve in 2019 (Hames & Schwarzenbach, Sun becoming a go-to, Sweet forgetting about her sophomore year, etc.), but if he takes something away from this match in particular, I would want to bet that it's probably developing Hames and evaluating rotations considering the sideout trouble Nebraska had at the end of the first and fifth sets when Foecke and Stivrins were front row.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:21:35 GMT -5
"Rally points." What a worthless designation. IMHO. But the concept is true. Aces and service errors eliminate all the other factors in the game. Nebraska hit better, dug the same, blocked nearly the same. All the other aspects of the game were very similar, except one glaring stat. It’d be dumb to dismiss that one glaring stat as meaningless. This. Is. Not. True. At. All. It. Is. Glaring. Because. You're. Not. Applying. Any. Context. To. It. Head meet wall.
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 21:46:40 GMT -5
But the concept is true. Aces and service errors eliminate all the other factors in the game. Nebraska hit better, dug the same, blocked nearly the same. All the other aspects of the game were very similar, except one glaring stat. It’d be dumb to dismiss that one glaring stat as meaningless. This. Is. Not. True. At. All. It. Is. Glaring. Because. You're. Not. Applying. Any. Context. To. It. Head meet wall. During a service error, does any team pass the ball, set the ball, hit the ball, block the ball, or dig the ball? Just because you put a period between each word doesn’t make your post any better.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:50:48 GMT -5
This. Is. Not. True. At. All. It. Is. Glaring. Because. You're. Not. Applying. Any. Context. To. It. Head meet wall. During a service error, does any team pass the ball, set the ball, hit the ball, block the ball, or dig the ball? Just because you put a period between each word doesn’t make your post any better. I wasn't trying to make it better. I was trying to make it simpler so that you could finally understand.
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 21:51:31 GMT -5
Personally I agree too. I think while it’s accurate, it’s kinda silly. But the concept is true. Aces and service errors eliminate all the other factors in the game. Nebraska hit better, dug the same, blocked nearly the same. All the other aspects of the game were very similar, except one glaring stat. It’d be dumb to dismiss that one glaring stat as meaningless. But yes, the term non-rally and rally points are silly. Every point is a rally, some just end quicker than others. Yes, but the REASON for their end is not the same. And, very often, the reason was the serve. Either its effectiveness or its lack thereof. I honestly don’t get this. Why the but? Nothing you said is counter to what I said. What you said is true and I agree with it. I honestly don’t see where that disagrees with what I said. Again, rally and non-rally point terminology is silly even if the concept is valid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 21:51:36 GMT -5
Shhhh, what is your position? nope not taking this ban bait
|
|
|
Post by Scipio Aemilianus on Jan 27, 2019 21:54:30 GMT -5
Shhhh, what is your position? nope not taking this ban bait Because. You. Don't. Have. A. Position. Other. Than. To. Say. You've. Already. Said. It. Before. You're. Only. Position. Is. That. Other. People. Are. Wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 22:00:34 GMT -5
Yes, but the REASON for their end is not the same. And, very often, the reason was the serve. Either its effectiveness or its lack thereof. I honestly don’t get this. Why the but? Nothing you said is counter to what I said. What you said is true and I agree with it. I honestly don’t see where that disagrees with what I said. Again, rally and non-rally point terminology is silly even if the concept is valid. I'm not really disputing anything you are saying. Just saying that "rally-points" can't automatically be separated from "non-rally points." Or, if they are, they need to be broken down further.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2019 22:03:38 GMT -5
nope not taking this ban bait Because. You. Don't. Have. A. Position. Other. Than. To. Say. You've. Already. Said. It. Before. You're. Only. Position. Is. That. Other. People. Are. Wrong. That's literally what you're doing by ignoring these posts: Why do I have to keep reiterating my positions and points to you when you've already shown a desire to purposefully misconstrue them to the point of ridiculousness? EDIT: replying was a mistake
|
|