|
Post by volleyguy on Aug 5, 2019 11:05:08 GMT -5
... so help them God. That's where the hell part comes in. No help needed, they already are winning. #FakeNews
|
|
|
Post by azvb on Aug 5, 2019 11:36:14 GMT -5
From everything I’ve read, I think the Butlers will win this case. I have a hard time believing this mom didn’t know their past. I guess it’s possible she signed her daughter up on the recommendations of friends/coaches that are Rickbots. I’m a Google, Yelp kinda gal myself. BUT, if it keeps his crimes on the front page and costs them money, I am pleased.
But a win for them in this case doesn’t AT ALL wipe their plate clean of their past.
|
|
|
Post by deohge on Aug 5, 2019 11:53:50 GMT -5
No help needed, they already are winning. #FakeNews I have to agree, the lawsuit and allegations are Fake News.
|
|
|
Post by azvb on Aug 5, 2019 12:03:40 GMT -5
A quick look will show you that deohge was an account established at the end of January, 2019, apparently with the express intent of defending the Butlers and throwing shade on those who were abused by RB. I suggest that many of you may lower your blood pressure by blocking 'his' posts. I’ve only ever blocked one account, dirt. Can’t remember how. Maybe I have to be on my laptop? My phone isn’t much help. So are dirt and deohge one and the same?
|
|
|
Post by ineedajob on Aug 5, 2019 12:05:48 GMT -5
I’ve only ever blocked one account, dirt. Can’t remember how. Maybe I have to be on my laptop? My phone isn’t much help. So are dirt and deohge one and the same? Not at all. Dirt was a senile old man who was very anti-Butler, but made absolutely no sense in any of his ramblings. deohge is a pro-Butler troll.
|
|
|
Post by azvb on Aug 5, 2019 12:14:38 GMT -5
So are dirt and deohge one and the same? Not at all. Dirt was a senile old man who was very anti-Butler, but made absolutely no sense in any of his ramblings. deohge is a pro-Butler troll. Okay. Confused why he was mentioned in trainers post about deleting. Carry on.
|
|
|
Post by deohge on Aug 5, 2019 12:35:13 GMT -5
So are dirt and deohge one and the same? Not at all. Dirt was a senile old man who was very anti-Butler, but made absolutely no sense in any of his ramblings. deohge is a pro-Butler troll. 👍
|
|
|
Post by trainermch on Aug 5, 2019 12:58:38 GMT -5
I’ve only ever blocked one account, dirt. Can’t remember how. Maybe I have to be on my laptop? My phone isn’t much help. So are dirt and deohge one and the same? I’m guessing no. Dirt was a victim himself years back, if true, so that would not be something a victim would stoke flames with. However, he always came across as “touched” so who knows?
|
|
|
Post by itsallrelative on Aug 5, 2019 13:09:23 GMT -5
From everything I’ve read, I think the Butlers will win this case. I have a hard time believing this mom didn’t know their past. I guess it’s possible she signed her daughter up on the recommendations of friends/coaches that are Rickbots. I’m a Google, Yelp kinda gal myself. BUT, if it keeps his crimes on the front page and costs them money, I am pleased. But a win for them in this case doesn’t AT ALL wipe their plate clean of their past. This x1000..... and, if they win, do they get legal fees paid or not?
|
|
|
Post by why on Aug 14, 2019 16:59:34 GMT -5
He, and Cheryl, will also be going to depositions ordered by the court to be completed before 8.14.19. so they have that to look forward to I guess we will find out in the next few days if Rick and Cheryl gave their depositions. I wonder if Rick stuck to his story that everyone was 18?
|
|
|
Post by spike888 on Sept 3, 2019 22:37:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by knowthetruth on Sept 4, 2019 12:57:15 GMT -5
Guilty people rarely take the stand. So no.
|
|
|
Post by deohge on Sept 4, 2019 13:34:35 GMT -5
Guilty people rarely take the stand. So no. Neither do the innocent. 😏
|
|
|
Post by why on Sept 4, 2019 15:17:17 GMT -5
Guilty people rarely take the stand. So no. I thought in a civil suit people must go on the stand. Please correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
|
Post by itsallrelative on Sept 4, 2019 15:40:38 GMT -5
Guilty people rarely take the stand. So no. I thought in a civil suit people must go on the stand. Please correct me if I am wrong. Isn't this a criminal suit (since they lifted the statute of limitations?)
|
|