|
Post by bvhcumoot on May 22, 2019 19:09:32 GMT -5
He hasn’t already? Why postpone what appears inevitable within 30 days?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2019 19:46:46 GMT -5
Inevitable even though no one seems to know what the hell is going on, other than (maybe) the people involved? I sure haven't seen any indication anyone on this thread knows.
|
|
|
Post by deepsouthfan on May 22, 2019 20:00:26 GMT -5
Inevitable even though no one seems to know what the hell is going on, other than (maybe) the people involved? I sure haven't seen any indication anyone on this thread knows. I know. He broke the rules and got caught. Not the first one to do it... won’t be the last one to get caught.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2019 20:01:44 GMT -5
What rule(s)? What specific rule or rules?
It matters. Also, is he guilty?
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on May 22, 2019 20:02:08 GMT -5
Yes...tricky rules...fraught with peril.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 22, 2019 20:08:58 GMT -5
You keep bringing "peril" into it. There's no peril.
|
|
|
Post by notwvb on May 22, 2019 20:15:41 GMT -5
Inevitable even though no one seems to know what the hell is going on, other than (maybe) the people involved? I sure haven't seen any indication anyone on this thread knows. We do know the AD said a former student athlete filed the report against Bond. This narrows it to (a) a former Georgia Tech SA, (b) Tom Brands, Iowa head wrestling coach and Hawkeye wrestling legend, and (c) Karch.
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on May 22, 2019 20:37:02 GMT -5
The former student-athlete must’ve been disgruntled for some reason. I think, for the most part, if some student-athlete knew about rules infractions, they wouldn’t “rat” on her former coach out of a sense of moral or ethical obligation. They would only come forth because they felt personally wronged somehow. I think people generally let a lot of things slide unless it’s personal. No one who is gruntled would really come forth. (Yes, “gruntled” is a word.)
|
|
money
Sophomore
Posts: 223
|
Post by money on May 22, 2019 20:38:50 GMT -5
He hasn’t already? Why postpone what appears inevitable within 30 days? Based on his $215,000 contract - resigning would cost him $18,000 rather than “work” another 30 days.
|
|
|
Post by bvhcumoot on May 22, 2019 20:46:44 GMT -5
🤔 $$$. Okay.
|
|
|
Post by bvhcumoot on May 22, 2019 20:49:13 GMT -5
Inevitable even though no one seems to know what the hell is going on, other than (maybe) the people involved? I sure haven't seen any indication anyone on this thread knows. Bit significant enough to warrant AD public statement, NCAA review, a contract that covers such ( maybe they all do?), and commentary from VTers about his previous misdoings.
|
|
|
Post by vbnerd on May 22, 2019 21:18:58 GMT -5
The former student-athlete must’ve been disgruntled for some reason. I think, for the most part, if some student-athlete knew about rules infractions, they wouldn’t “rat” on her former coach out of a sense of moral or ethical obligation. They would only come forth because they felt personally wronged somehow. I think people generally let a lot of things slide unless it’s personal. No one who is gruntled would really come forth. (Yes, “gruntled” is a word.) Not necessarily. You've heard those 911 calls when somebody calls the police because the person they were selling drugs to robbed them? Some people are dumb and don't realize what they are asking. "Hey Mr. AD, I can't find Coach. I was looking through my records and I only got $4,500 in performance bonuses and I think I earned the full $5,000. I was hoping someone could either help me find the other $500 or explain why I didn't get it."
|
|
|
Post by Wolfgang on May 22, 2019 21:22:09 GMT -5
The former student-athlete must’ve been disgruntled for some reason. I think, for the most part, if some student-athlete knew about rules infractions, they wouldn’t “rat” on her former coach out of a sense of moral or ethical obligation. They would only come forth because they felt personally wronged somehow. I think people generally let a lot of things slide unless it’s personal. No one who is gruntled would really come forth. (Yes, “gruntled” is a word.) Not necessarily. You've heard those 911 calls when somebody calls the police because the person they were selling drugs to robbed them? Some people are dumb and don't realize what they are asking. "Hey Mr. AD, I can't find Coach. I was looking through my records and I only got $4,500 in performance bonuses and I think I earned the full $5,000. I was hoping someone could either help me find the other $500 or explain why I didn't get it." Yeah, I know. When I posted, I knew there would be some cases not involving personal disgruntled-ness. I post the general knowing there would be specific exceptions, otherwise I'd be here all night writing a detailed examination of all possibilities.
|
|
|
Post by ironhammer on May 22, 2019 21:22:36 GMT -5
What rule(s)? What specific rule or rules? It matters. Also, is he guilty? The biggest question on this thread and we still have no idea.
|
|
|
Post by Floyd R. Turbo on May 23, 2019 7:57:11 GMT -5
(Yes, “gruntled” is a word.) So...if “disgruntled” means “unhappy”, then “gruntled” means “happy”, right? So to show that we’re happy, one should grunt? Just asking for a friend.
|
|