|
|
Post by Friday on May 4, 2020 21:51:53 GMT -5
What recruits are coming in? What positions Is Iowa looking at for class of 2022?
|
|
|
|
Post by PointHawks on May 5, 2020 13:21:15 GMT -5
Haley Melby Michio OH for 22 is the only recruit showing in Rich Kern. What recruits are coming in? What positions Is Iowa looking at for class of 2022? |
|
|
|
Post by hawkfan on May 5, 2020 14:41:19 GMT -5
What recruits are coming in? What positions Is Iowa looking at for class of 2022? Here is info on 2021 and 2022 recruits from earlier in the thread. Hope all my fellow Hawk fans are safe and healthy. GO HAWKS! Sydney Dennis - DS - 5'5 - Clarence, IA - North Cedar - Iowa Rockets - 2021 Lauren Schrock - OH - 6'1 - Solon, IA - Solon - Iowa Rockets - 2021 Jenna Splitt - OPP/S - 5'11 - Cary, IL - Cary-Grove - Sports Performance - 2021 Haley Melby - OH - 6'1 - Munster, IN - Munster - Michio - 2022 |
|
|
|
Post by vollem on May 17, 2020 13:20:12 GMT -5
|
|
yac12
High School
Posts: 8
|
Post by yac12 on May 20, 2020 13:52:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on May 20, 2020 14:03:26 GMT -5
"Iowa also was hit with minor recruiting reductions as part of the ruling" That is obviously the most concerning line. I'm hopeful the Athletic Department's attention to the "Do it the Right Way" mantra led to a thorough and complete investigation, with rulings from which we can move forward from. |
|
|
|
Post by hawkfan on May 20, 2020 14:48:54 GMT -5
"Iowa also was hit with minor recruiting reductions as part of the ruling" That is obviously the most concerning line. I'm hopeful the Athletic Department's attention to the "Do it the Right Way" mantra led to a thorough and complete investigation, with rulings from which we can move forward from. I agree about that being a concerning line. Also, what exactly does the "one year probation" entail? Only the $5000 fine and the recruiting impact? Or is there more to that like not being eligible for NCAAs, for example? |
|
|
|
Post by n00b on May 20, 2020 17:59:07 GMT -5
"Iowa also was hit with minor recruiting reductions as part of the ruling" That is obviously the most concerning line. I'm hopeful the Athletic Department's attention to the "Do it the Right Way" mantra led to a thorough and complete investigation, with rulings from which we can move forward from. I agree about that being a concerning line. Also, what exactly does the "one year probation" entail? Only the $5000 fine and the recruiting impact? Or is there more to that like not being eligible for NCAAs, for example? Probation just means they'll be watched a little more closely than usual by the NCAA. If they commit further violations while on probation, penalties will be extra severe. |
|
|
|
Post by notwvb on May 20, 2020 18:50:47 GMT -5
I agree about that being a concerning line. Also, what exactly does the "one year probation" entail? Only the $5000 fine and the recruiting impact? Or is there more to that like not being eligible for NCAAs, for example? Probation just means they'll be watched a little more closely than usual by the NCAA. If they commit further violations while on probation, penalties will be extra severe. At least the NCAA didn't put the Hawkeyes on double secret probation. GO HAWKS! |
|
|
|
Post by volleyaudience on May 20, 2020 18:51:30 GMT -5
On the coach Bond Shymansky, the ruling was a two year "show cause" order. Do I understand correctly that under an order like this a coach can be hired, but the new school needs to make regular reports on his progress? |
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on May 21, 2020 11:27:17 GMT -5
"Iowa also was hit with minor recruiting reductions as part of the ruling" That is obviously the most concerning line. I'm hopeful the Athletic Department's attention to the "Do it the Right Way" mantra led to a thorough and complete investigation, with rulings from which we can move forward from. I agree about that being a concerning line. Also, what exactly does the "one year probation" entail? Only the $5000 fine and the recruiting impact? Or is there more to that like not being eligible for NCAAs, for example? Here is the TWENTY-TWO page ruling: hawkeyesports.com/documents/2020/5/20/Iowa_Decision_Binder.pdfI believe the minor recruiting reductions can be found here: "A reduction of women’s volleyball evaluation days by 3.75% for a total of 77 days." That does seem pretty minor. Here is something I'd like to add... I don't think Iowa fans should look back at Shymansky with any sort of vitriol. I believe he had the right intentions with the program, and with his history at U of I, I fully believe he was in it for the long haul. I also don't believe the decision to commit this violation was based purely in the desire to get a step ahead of the competition. Obviously, Louis was an attractive transfer on the market, and whatever school landed her was going to be in great luck. But Bond also had years of relationship built with her, and I think the human element of "I want to help this girl out however I can" also factored into his poor decision-making. It was wrong. He paid the price, the program paid the price, and it is what it is. I continue to thank Bond for the vision he had for the program while he was here, and now we continue moving forward. |
|
yac12
High School
Posts: 8
|
Post by yac12 on May 21, 2020 12:01:46 GMT -5
I agree about that being a concerning line. Also, what exactly does the "one year probation" entail? Only the $5000 fine and the recruiting impact? Or is there more to that like not being eligible for NCAAs, for example? Here is the TWENTY-TWO page ruling: hawkeyesports.com/documents/2020/5/20/Iowa_Decision_Binder.pdfI believe the minor recruiting reductions can be found here: "A reduction of women’s volleyball evaluation days by 3.75% for a total of 77 days." That does seem pretty minor. Here is something I'd like to add... I don't think Iowa fans should look back at Shymansky with any sort of vitriol. I believe he had the right intentions with the program, and with his history at U of I, I fully believe he was in it for the long haul. I also don't believe the decision to commit this violation was based purely in the desire to get a step ahead of the competition. Obviously, Louis was an attractive transfer on the market, and whatever school landed her was going to be in great luck. But Bond also had years of relationship built with her, and I think the human element of "I want to help this girl out however I can" also factored into his poor decision-making. It was wrong. He paid the price, the program paid the price, and it is what it is. I continue to thank Bond for the vision he had for the program while he was here, and now we continue moving forward. Your statement about the human element coming into his decision is why I have been so torn on this. Yes, an infraction was made, but enough to fire? |
|
|
|
Post by northwoods on May 21, 2020 16:11:55 GMT -5
"Iowa also was hit with minor recruiting reductions as part of the ruling" That is obviously the most concerning line. I'm hopeful the Athletic Department's attention to the "Do it the Right Way" mantra led to a thorough and complete investigation, with rulings from which we can move forward from. Well, this breaks the tie for 3rd place in the 2018 B1G dropping Nebraska to 4th in Conference! |
|
|
|
Post by jackson5vb on May 21, 2020 16:54:25 GMT -5
Rutgers gets some W's!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on May 21, 2020 18:32:16 GMT -5
The most disappointing is losing that 5-set W over Wisconsin  |
|
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/W34E6WUZKNAYPJECX7XWMXTMRM.JPG)
