|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 9, 2020 20:04:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 9, 2020 20:04:37 GMT -5
from ultra liberal Washington Post no less.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Aug 9, 2020 20:16:58 GMT -5
You're so intellectually lazy. Did you even read that? It doesn't support your view as much as you think it does.
Regardless, the 2020 research I posted is still better for a variety of reasons, which again, you might understand if you actually clicked on the links I provided. You should learn to actually engage with evidence and research, instead of blindly posting links you find from Google.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Aug 9, 2020 22:49:56 GMT -5
Washington Football Team officially licensed apparel is already out! Check it out! I haven't had a favorite football team to follow in decades, but seriously am considering getting on the Washington Football Team bandwagon this season! store.washingtonfootball.com/ You know, the traditional colors with those graphics aren’t bad at all.
|
|
cutshot818
Junior
2020 VT All-Rookie Team
Posts: 289
|
Post by cutshot818 on Aug 9, 2020 22:52:40 GMT -5
Washington Football Team officially licensed apparel is already out! Check it out! I haven't had a favorite football team to follow in decades, but seriously am considering getting on the Washington Football Team bandwagon this season! store.washingtonfootball.com/ You know, the traditional colors with those graphics aren’t bad at all. I plan to buy a few items and keep the tags on them in original mint condition. They might be worth something down the road as collectibles.
|
|
|
Post by geddyleeridesagain on Aug 9, 2020 22:56:10 GMT -5
You know, the traditional colors with those graphics aren’t bad at all. I plan to buy a few items and keep the tags on them in original mint condition. They might be worth something down the road as collectibles. Not the worst idea. I doubt they go more than one season with the current name.
|
|
cutshot818
Junior
2020 VT All-Rookie Team
Posts: 289
|
Post by cutshot818 on Aug 9, 2020 22:58:35 GMT -5
I plan to buy a few items and keep the tags on them in original mint condition. They might be worth something down the road as collectibles. Not the worst idea. I doubt they go more than one season with the current name. I just witnessed a boogie board that sold for 11k this past week in an online auction. You just never know what kinda value some things will fetch in 20-30 years.
|
|
|
Post by XAsstCoach on Aug 10, 2020 21:23:20 GMT -5
Supposedly the word Redskins was created by the American Indians to reference each other in a benevolent way (if at all possible), and loosely translated by the French in the 17th/18th century, and subsequently by the English.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 10, 2020 21:32:24 GMT -5
You're so intellectually lazy. Did you even read that? It doesn't support your view as much as you think it does. Regardless, the 2020 research I posted is still better for a variety of reasons, which again, you might understand if you actually clicked on the links I provided. You should learn to actually engage with evidence and research, instead of blindly posting links you find from Google. did you seriously just call me intellectually lazy? After I provided two links when you said it wasn’t possible. And you totally ignored them and yet you’re calling me intellectually lazy? One thing about the left, they pretend to care about Native Americans and blacks but they really don’t If it doesn’t fit their agenda.Now that you realize Native Americans really don’t care about the name or logo, that doesn’t suit your political purpose. Having blacks support the police also doesn’t fit your political agenda.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 10, 2020 21:34:34 GMT -5
Supposedly the word Redskins was created by the American Indians to reference each other in a benevolent way (if at all possible), and loosely translated by the French in the 17th/18th century, and subsequently by the English. And the logo was created by a native American designer. But that doesn’t matter either. It’s call about what the woke crowd wants
|
|
|
Post by cindra on Aug 10, 2020 21:36:56 GMT -5
Again, who is hurt by getting rid of it? Who benefits from having the team called the redskins? I have yet to get a proper answer.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 10, 2020 22:23:55 GMT -5
Again, who is hurt by getting rid of it? Who benefits from having the team called the redskins? I have yet to get a proper answer. Isn’t the entire point of changing the name is that you people used the argument that it offended Native Americans which it didn’t. That was your entire argument, remember? Now that the polls have come out and 90% of the native Americans thought it was a compliment, do you not care about their opinion now?
|
|
|
Post by cindra on Aug 10, 2020 22:31:09 GMT -5
Again, who is hurt by getting rid of it? Who benefits from having the team called the redskins? I have yet to get a proper answer. Isn’t the entire point of changing the name is that you people used the argument that it offended Native Americans which it didn’t. That was your entire argument, remember? Now that the polls have come out and 90% of the native Americans thought it was a compliment, do you not care about their opinion now? That's a) not what the survey said and b) there was already a link posted about some problems with the survey. Again, who is hurt by changing it?
|
|
|
Post by donut on Aug 11, 2020 0:38:36 GMT -5
You're so intellectually lazy. Did you even read that? It doesn't support your view as much as you think it does. Regardless, the 2020 research I posted is still better for a variety of reasons, which again, you might understand if you actually clicked on the links I provided. You should learn to actually engage with evidence and research, instead of blindly posting links you find from Google. did you seriously just call me intellectually lazy? After I provided two links when you said it wasn’t possible. And you totally ignored them and yet you’re calling me intellectually lazy? One thing about the left, they pretend to care about Native Americans and blacks but they really don’t If it doesn’t fit their agenda.Now that you realize Native Americans really don’t care about the name or logo, that doesn’t suit your political purpose. Having blacks support the police also doesn’t fit your political agenda. I didn't ignore your links. I even posted resources that criticized your study. You didn't even read the second link you posted (it's honestly too good – a quote: "The name is a dictionary-defined slur, whether or not 10 percent of Native Americans or 50 percent of your co-workers or your favorite aunt acknowledge it.") Then, you ignored the more recent and more comprehensive research I posted. And there you go again. Going on some tangent about "the left" (and wtf? How on Earth did we get to blacks supporting the police?) and resorting to your same old diversionary tactics.
|
|
|
Post by holidayhusker on Aug 11, 2020 5:59:57 GMT -5
did you seriously just call me intellectually lazy? After I provided two links when you said it wasn’t possible. And you totally ignored them and yet you’re calling me intellectually lazy? One thing about the left, they pretend to care about Native Americans and blacks but they really don’t If it doesn’t fit their agenda.Now that you realize Native Americans really don’t care about the name or logo, that doesn’t suit your political purpose. Having blacks support the police also doesn’t fit your political agenda. I didn't ignore your links. I even posted resources that criticized your study. You didn't even read the second link you posted (it's honestly too good – a quote: "The name is a dictionary-defined slur, whether or not 10 percent of Native Americans or 50 percent of your co-workers or your favorite aunt acknowledge it.") Then, you ignored the more recent and more comprehensive research I posted. And there you go again. Going on some tangent about "the left" (and wtf? How on Earth did we get to blacks supporting the police?) and resorting to your same old diversionary tactics. bottom line, you just cannot admit that you’re wrong. This entire argument started out that it was offensive to Native Americans. When I proved that was not the case with two excellent sources, you ignored it. Pathetic.
|
|