|
|
Post by southbay11 on Jul 11, 2020 8:58:07 GMT -5
Going back and forth on what to do. One for each tourney is a given. Different seedings each weeketc. Overall winners will be close to a given so why not pick the best and the worst overall and have a bonus for the team that will finish with the highest gain from start to finish...just spitballing myself. |
|
|
|
Post by JB Southpaw on Jul 11, 2020 9:13:06 GMT -5
my initial work has been kind of how they used to do the Fantasy.
You get $1M to spend on your roster each tournament, you have to pick 2 mens, 2 womens and 1 Q team from each gender as well.
Whomever has the best average finish of their roster wins.
Choices, ride or die over the 3 cup series with the same 6 teams, they could move up from the Q or drop into the Q making big gains or loses.
Payout for each Cup winner, and overall winner at end. Overall winner would be where your teams finished in the champions Cup standings.
Or
Every week you pick 6 new teams with the same format.
Payout for each Cup winner, overall winner, based on each entrants finishes over the 3 cups.
|
|
