|
Post by donut on Apr 25, 2021 12:35:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by westcoasthusker on Apr 25, 2021 12:39:01 GMT -5
me too, congratulations Kentucky. Who do you think Nebraska fans were cheering for? Texas?
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 25, 2021 12:41:34 GMT -5
me too, congratulations Kentucky. Who do you think Nebraska fans were cheering for? Texas? I don't really care? I just couldn't hear your excuses for this season over the sound of the National Championship trophy.
|
|
|
Post by vbdiva2 on Apr 25, 2021 14:26:32 GMT -5
Chile boo.. as a black female, that played in the Big and knowing how the inner-workings run, I said what I said. No 👎 racist... read it again - stop being goofy. Are you really trying to prop why they’re not tourneys in Compton to greed and white peoples money? Seriously. They arnt held there because it’s dangerous. Why don’t you ask city officials why they have allowed it to be so dangerous instead of blaming greed and white peoples money. That’s ridiculous. The officials supposedly in charge of making peoples lives better do nothing and suffer no accountability. I don’t disagree that their is greed in all sports and their organizations. They all want to make the most money they can like any business but throwing greed and white peoples money in to why they don’t have tourney in Compton is just laughable. Has nothing to do with white people in this instance. I guarentee their are plenty of people of all races that wouldn’t want to go to tourney there. They only care about the Benjamin’s of Karen’s and Kyle and that isn’t racist then you get called on it and tell other person they are racist. So the way of our society these days. The racists calling everyone else racists. Zzzzz *yawn*. You win, you schooled me girl....lol
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 15:17:23 GMT -5
Are you really trying to prop why they’re not tourneys in Compton to greed and white peoples money? Seriously. They arnt held there because it’s dangerous. Why don’t you ask city officials why they have allowed it to be so dangerous instead of blaming greed and white peoples money. That’s ridiculous. The officials supposedly in charge of making peoples lives better do nothing and suffer no accountability. I don’t disagree that their is greed in all sports and their organizations. They all want to make the most money they can like any business but throwing greed and white peoples money in to why they don’t have tourney in Compton is just laughable. Has nothing to do with white people in this instance. I guarentee their are plenty of people of all races that wouldn’t want to go to tourney there. They only care about the Benjamin’s of Karen’s and Kyle and that isn’t racist then you get called on it and tell other person they are racist. So the way of our society these days. The racists calling everyone else racists. Zzzzz *yawn*. You win, you schooled me girl....lol Can never admit when your wrong just throw random sarcasm. Weak but that’s some people.
|
|
|
Post by NebraskaVBfan93 on Apr 25, 2021 15:35:44 GMT -5
CONGRATULATIONS!! I have to admit, I would be one that had counted Kenucky among the over-rated. Boy was I wrong. What a fun team to watch and oh so talented. And those who would put an asterisk on this Championship would be making a big mistake, unless they are placing it there to designate it as tough as hell. Again... Excellent season. Can’t wait for a slight bit more normalcy in the fall.
|
|
|
Post by gogophers on Apr 25, 2021 16:05:50 GMT -5
Why Wisconsin lost: Eggleston. Fields. Butler. O'Neal. You have players like that and you could beat any team. You could also lose. But if you win, it can't be said to be a surprise. Not with that level of talent. In the past, Texas also had weaknesses that very good teams could exploit. Give Elliot credit: The backrow defense has improved. The passing has improved. The setting has improved. If Texas played in the Big10, would it be conference champ? I of course have no way of knowing for sure. But if they did come out on top, I wouldn't be surprised. What other Big10 team has four players as good as the ones I named?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 20:28:22 GMT -5
Why Wisconsin lost: Eggleston. Fields. Butler. O'Neal. You have players like that and you could beat any team. You could also lose. But if you win, it can't be said to be a surprise. Not with that level of talent. In the past, Texas also had weaknesses that very good teams could exploit. Give Elliot credit: The backrow defense has improved. The passing has improved. The setting has improved. If Texas played in the Big10, would it be conference champ? I of course have no way of knowing for sure. But if they did come out on top, I wouldn't be surprised. What other Big10 team has four players as good as the ones I named? Wisconsin lost to Texas for the same reason they lost to Stanford in 2019 - they couldn't compete OOS. That comes down to the lefts. Eggleston and Fields are better than any pair of OHs in the B1G. Unless you see OHs like that in your gym/conference it is hard to prepare for them. Haggerty and Loberg could not produce at that level OOS.
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Apr 25, 2021 20:51:03 GMT -5
Why Wisconsin lost: Eggleston. Fields. Butler. O'Neal. You have players like that and you could beat any team. You could also lose. But if you win, it can't be said to be a surprise. Not with that level of talent. In the past, Texas also had weaknesses that very good teams could exploit. Give Elliot credit: The backrow defense has improved. The passing has improved. The setting has improved. If Texas played in the Big10, would it be conference champ? I of course have no way of knowing for sure. But if they did come out on top, I wouldn't be surprised. What other Big10 team has four players as good as the ones I named? Wisconsin lost to Texas for the same reason they lost to Stanford in 2019 - they couldn't compete OOS. That comes down to the lefts. Eggleston and Fields are better than any pair of OHs in the B1G. Unless you see OHs like that in your gym/conference it is hard to prepare for them. Haggerty and Loberg could not produce at that level OOS. Plus Texas outpassed them. By a lot. Worse OOS plus worse passing is not a recipe for success.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 21:07:01 GMT -5
Wisconsin lost to Texas for the same reason they lost to Stanford in 2019 - they couldn't compete OOS. That comes down to the lefts. Eggleston and Fields are better than any pair of OHs in the B1G. Unless you see OHs like that in your gym/conference it is hard to prepare for them. Haggerty and Loberg could not produce at that level OOS. Plus Texas outpassed them. By a lot. Worse OOS plus worse passing is not a recipe for success. They have won matches this year when they were outpassed. They won the serve pass game against Stanford in 2019. Plummer didn't care. Sheffield knows this. He has been talking about improving OOS all year but he can't make Loberg and Haggerty more athletic. Wisconsin looked good in the B1G because there are no elite OH duos in the B1G.
|
|
|
Post by mervynpumpkinhead on Apr 25, 2021 21:11:53 GMT -5
Plus Texas outpassed them. By a lot. Worse OOS plus worse passing is not a recipe for success. They have won matches this year when they were outpassed. They won the serve pass game against Stanford in 2019. Plummer didn't care. Sheffield knows this. He has been talking about improving OOS all year but he can't make Loberg and Haggerty more athletic. Wisconsin looked good in the B1G because there are no elite OH duos in the B1G. Or they looked good because they're good.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Apr 25, 2021 21:14:42 GMT -5
Well, you also look really good when your opponents have a combined win rate of 40%.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2021 21:15:08 GMT -5
They have won matches this year when they were outpassed. They won the serve pass game against Stanford in 2019. Plummer didn't care. Sheffield knows this. He has been talking about improving OOS all year but he can't make Loberg and Haggerty more athletic. Wisconsin looked good in the B1G because there are no elite OH duos in the B1G. Or they looked good because they're good. Sure. Just not one of the two best teams in the country. In this conversation we're discussing why they lost to Texas.
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Apr 25, 2021 21:16:39 GMT -5
Plus Texas outpassed them. By a lot. Worse OOS plus worse passing is not a recipe for success. . Plummer didn't care. She sure didn’t
|
|
|
Post by mervynpumpkinhead on Apr 25, 2021 22:00:12 GMT -5
Or they looked good because they're good. Sure. Just not one of the two best teams in the country. In this conversation we're discussing why they lost to Texas. Yes but you made it sound like the only reason they looked good is because of the apparent lack of an elite hitting duo in the Big Ten.
|
|