Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2021 21:49:43 GMT -5
Nobody really looks all that good. I expected more. Last years was pretty good. It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. literally nobody looked good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2021 21:50:54 GMT -5
It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. literally nobody looked good. I thought Robinson did, but that was literally it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2021 22:08:57 GMT -5
literally nobody looked good. I thought Robinson did, but that was literally it. I actually kind of like Smrek too but I didn’t watch the entire game so
|
|
|
Post by greatlakesvballer on Aug 23, 2021 1:02:08 GMT -5
It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. literally nobody looked good. Barnes looked great.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2021 7:30:35 GMT -5
The Badgers are the heavy favorite to win the league. They played very mediocre in Saturday’s scrimmage. I’m not concerned. My only worry is outside hitting.
|
|
|
Post by blackiechan1999 on Aug 23, 2021 8:08:30 GMT -5
It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. literally nobody looked good. Barnes and Demps were it for me.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Aug 23, 2021 8:31:58 GMT -5
I'm shooting to get match threads up today. :-)
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Aug 23, 2021 9:16:26 GMT -5
It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. literally nobody looked good. LOL Wisconsin's "second string" could go better than .500 in the B1G.
|
|
|
Post by northwoods on Aug 23, 2021 9:18:58 GMT -5
Nobody really looks all that good. I expected more. Last years was pretty good. It was very bad. Crazy that a group with Loberg, Rettke, Hilley, Hart, Barnes didn't look more fluid. It’s hard for them to look fluid when 3 are on one side of the net & 2 are on the other…
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2021 9:21:06 GMT -5
literally nobody looked good. LOL Wisconsin's "second string" could go better than .500 in the B1G. Not buying that for a second.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 23, 2021 9:37:14 GMT -5
literally nobody looked good. LOL Wisconsin's "second string" could go better than .500 in the B1G. 1. I didn’t say they weren’t talented. They just played horribly. 2. That’s laughable.
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 23, 2021 13:55:02 GMT -5
I'm shooting to get match threads up today. :-) Woohoo! It's really time!
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 23, 2021 14:09:40 GMT -5
I always like these questions because it forces one to think hard about the depth chart. Just winging it. What's clear is that we are light at MB. Wohlert should be a RS IMO.
1st string
OH: Demps (Civita) OH: Loberg MB: Rettke MB: Hart RS: Robinson (Ashburn) S: Hilley L: Barnes
2nd String
OH: Jardine (MacDonald) OH: Gregorski (Reed) MB: Smrek MB: Wohlert RS: Orzol S: Hammill L: Boyer
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 23, 2021 15:01:56 GMT -5
All that may change as players grow into the team.
|
|
|
Post by greatlakesvballer on Aug 23, 2021 15:40:29 GMT -5
I always like these questions because it forces one to think hard about the depth chart. Just winging it. What's clear is that we are light at MB. Wohlert should be a RS IMO. 1st string OH: Demps (Civita) OH: Loberg MB: Rettke MB: Hart RS: Robinson (Ashburn) S: Hilley L: Barnes 2nd String OH: Jardine (MacDonald) OH: Gregorski (Reed) MB: Smrek MB: Wohlert RS: Orzol S: Hammill L: Boyer Just seeing this makes me wish we could see them ALL play more. All that talent sitting on the bench that we never get to see....
|
|