|
|
Post by volleyboy12 on Dec 17, 2021 12:24:35 GMT -5
What is the line between trolling and stating your opinion that you do believe?
If everyone hates your opinion, is it still trolling?
BRUH YOU LITERALLY SAID YOU ARE TRYING TO PROVOKE SOME SPICY CONVERSATION THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT TROLLING IS |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2021 12:25:18 GMT -5
I'd argue that they're less deserving because they haven't gotten the job done yet. Perfect valid counter-point and opinion. I disagree. I think they're more deserving. (Also, I fixed your error in capitalization) |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2021 12:27:03 GMT -5
What is the line between trolling and stating your opinion that you do believe?
If everyone hates your opinion, is it still trolling?
BRUH YOU LITERALLY SAID YOU ARE TRYING TO PROVOKE SOME SPICY CONVERSATION THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT TROLLING IS Provoke and spicy don't necessarily imply that it is fabricated.
Trolling to me means you fabricate the point purely to get a reaction.
|
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Dec 17, 2021 12:34:21 GMT -5
What is the line between trolling and stating your opinion that you do believe?
If everyone hates your opinion, is it still trolling?
"provok[ing] some interested, "spicy" conversation" is trolling. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyboy12 on Dec 17, 2021 12:36:41 GMT -5
I'd argue that they're less deserving because they haven't gotten the job done yet. Perfect valid counter-point and opinion. I disagree. I think they're more deserving. (Also, I fixed your error in capitalization) i FiXeD yOuR eRrOr iN cApItAliZaTiOn |
|
|
|
Post by Wiswell on Dec 17, 2021 12:37:55 GMT -5
So the issue is here we have 31 hours until game time, and much like any sporting event (or news, for that matter), there is only so much analysis available.
Unfortunately, we haven't seen very robust analysis on this thread other than winning three times is hard. There have been a couple of other salient points.
What if someone could do a position by position analysis? (a neutral party). That would help. I don't want to see Vegas odds either or Pablo. Who cares?
|
|
|
|
Post by volleyboy12 on Dec 17, 2021 12:40:46 GMT -5
So the issue is here we have 31 hours until game time, and much like any sporting event (or news, for that matter), there is only so much analysis available. Unfortunately, we haven't seen very robust analysis on this thread other than winning three times is hard. There have been a couple of other salient points. What if someone could do a position by position analysis? (a neutral party). That would help. I don't want to see Vegas odds either or Pablo. Who cares? I mean even from a non-neutral party, you've got two teams led by All-American setters and middle-blockers, outstanding freshmen, and two of the best liberos in the entire country. I'm looking at this match and wondering what OH duo is going to come up big. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2021 12:41:32 GMT -5
"provok[ing] some interested, "spicy" conversation" is trolling. Disagree, and I gave the reason for the difference. |
|
|
|
Post by taxidea on Dec 17, 2021 12:43:24 GMT -5
So the issue is here we have 31 hours until game time, and much like any sporting event (or news, for that matter), there is only so much analysis available. Unfortunately, we haven't seen very robust analysis on this thread other than winning three times is hard. There have been a couple of other salient points. What if someone could do a position by position analysis? (a neutral party). That would help. I don't want to see Vegas odds either or Pablo. Who cares? +1...Exactly |
|
|
|
Post by volleyboy12 on Dec 17, 2021 12:46:07 GMT -5
"provok[ing] some interested, "spicy" conversation" is trolling. Disagree, and I gave the reason for the difference. Internet troll = a person who posts with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses. You + saying Wisconsin doesn't deserve a national championship = provoking an emotional response. If you want to disagree with the literal definition of an internet troll, then I guess we've got bigger issues that you need to deal with. |
|
|
|
Post by ted_heise on Dec 17, 2021 12:48:50 GMT -5
The amount of impact volleyball players who will be ending their collegiate careers with this match is reason alone to watch. Rettke, Hilley, Hames, & Stivrins specifically have brought so much liveliness to the sport. They (and all seniors from both squads) will be missed! Excellent point! I will *bigly* miss watching Lauren! She has a poker face like mine: non-existent. Her heart is always on her sleeve, and I will miss her play, her spirit, and her leadership.  Kayla will leave another big hole. Can't say I'm all that sad to see Dana and Syd move on--seems they've been traumatizing Husker fans for decades!
That said, I think Nicklin has another year of eligibility. I may have missed something on it, but I'm not aware she's made a decision on whether she will use it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2021 12:51:48 GMT -5
Internet troll = a person who posts with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses. I think you concocted this definition, and I disagree with it. You saying Wisconsin doesn't deserve a national championship I said no such thing. I did say that I don't think they deserve it before other more deserving programs get their's. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyboy12 on Dec 17, 2021 12:54:35 GMT -5
Internet troll = a person who posts with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses. I think you concocted this definition, and I disagree with it. You saying Wisconsin doesn't deserve a national championship I said no such thing. I did say that I don't think they deserve it before other more deserving programs get theirs. I literally Googled "troll" and found two definitions. But go off I guess. Also, I corrected your apostrophe error: "theirs" is already possessive. There is no reason for an apostrophe. |
|
|
|
Post by vollectator on Dec 17, 2021 12:58:24 GMT -5
it seems to me that all the pressure is on Wisconsin. pressure comes from being close multiple times but not having won one; from having dominated Nebraska and being expected to handle them again with like ease in the final; from a super class' last stand; ... Nebraska, on the other hand, has exceeded most expectations by a large margin. even if they lost in the final the season would still be considered a huge success. they've lost so often to wisconsin recently that they have nothing to lose (if that makes sense). would all of that play a part in the teams' and players' psyche?
|
|
|
|
Post by coachk2 on Dec 17, 2021 13:18:14 GMT -5
Technically both teams get the confetti 😂 it blasts over all of them 🎉 NCAA even had confetti for D3 Final at Wash U when Wisconsin-Eau Claire won over Calvin 🤩 ooh, Wisconsin won that match 😃 is that an 🦡 omen?
|
|
Kayla will leave another big hole. Can't say I'm all that sad to see Dana and Syd move on--seems they've been traumatizing Husker fans for decades!