|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 0:32:58 GMT -5
But we must stand up against those that perpetuate inaccurate reporting on our website! We cannot stand for unsubstantiated rumors and a revolving door of character assassination. Are you trying to get banned? lol For what? Challenging you to think with consistent concepts. Asking if you apply the same standard. Please, do tell. |
|
|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 0:36:57 GMT -5
But we must stand up against those that perpetuate inaccurate reporting on our website! We cannot stand for unsubstantiated rumors and a revolving door of character assassination. Oh, f*ck off already. I have no idea what you mean since you used an asterisk. Way to completely skirt the rules and any conversational norm. This is a great demonstration of your intelligence and conversational skills. |
|
|
|
Post by Boom! on Jan 6, 2024 0:47:20 GMT -5
Are you trying to get banned? lol For what? Challenging you to think with consistent concepts. Asking if you apply the same standard. Please, do tell. How well do you know Steve Aird? I mean, how well do you really know Steve Aird. |
|
|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 0:56:52 GMT -5
For what? Challenging you to think with consistent concepts. Asking if you apply the same standard. Please, do tell. How well do you know Steve Aird? I mean, how well do you really know Steve Aird. Good try on change of subject. I asked about applying consistent standards. I am asking for thinkers to disregard preconceived notions and to objectively analyze things. My closeness to Steve has nothing to do with posters being able to objectively post/think about analysis patterns. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 6, 2024 0:59:02 GMT -5
How well do you know Steve Aird? I mean, how well do you really know Steve Aird. Good try on change of subject. I asked about applying consistent standards. I am asking for thinkers to disregard preconceived notions and to objectively analyze things. My closeness to Steve has nothing to do with posters being able to objectively post/think about analysis patterns. Who cares about your analysis of patterns. If you have something to say, say it clearly and distinctly. |
|
|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 1:18:40 GMT -5
Good try on change of subject. I asked about applying consistent standards. I am asking for thinkers to disregard preconceived notions and to objectively analyze things. My closeness to Steve has nothing to do with posters being able to objectively post/think about analysis patterns. Who cares about your analysis of patterns. If you have something to say, say it clearly and distinctly. Analysis patterns have more to do with the analysis of things. The analysis of patterns has more to do with the patterns. Your analysis seems to show your head buried in the upward stroke of trajectory feces. |
|
|
|
Post by ineedajob on Jan 6, 2024 1:26:53 GMT -5
Who cares about your analysis of patterns. If you have something to say, say it clearly and distinctly. Analysis patterns have more to do with the analysis of things. The analysis of patterns have more to do with the patterns. Your analysis seems so show your head buried in the upward stroke of trajectory feces. If you're trying to make it look like you didn't start the "Shondell" thread just because you've got a personal vendetta against the him/the Shondell family, you're doing the absolute worst job of it. You're going from being some random poster without credibility to just being a flat-out troll. |
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jan 6, 2024 1:33:58 GMT -5
Who cares about your analysis of patterns. If you have something to say, say it clearly and distinctly. Analysis patterns have more to do with the analysis of things. The analysis of patterns have more to do with the patterns. Your analysis seems so show your head buried in the upward stroke of trajectory feces. Your pseudo-intellectualism is clearly on display. Do you have anything intelligent to say about Steve Aird? |
|
|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 1:39:49 GMT -5
Analysis patterns have more to do with the analysis of things. The analysis of patterns has more to do with the patterns. Your analysis seems to show your head buried in the upward stroke of trajectory feces. If you're trying to make it look like you didn't start the "Shondell" thread just because you've got a personal vendetta against the him/the Shondell family, you're doing the absolute worst job of it. You're going from being some random poster without credibility to just being a flat-out troll. Thanks for all of your advice. All of the great counter-points that you make help negate the logical thinking of everybody. |
|
|
|
Post by hangonsloopy on Jan 6, 2024 1:40:00 GMT -5
How well do you know Steve Aird? I mean, how well do you really know Steve Aird. Good try on change of subject. I asked about applying consistent standards. I am asking for thinkers to disregard preconceived notions and to objectively analyze things. My closeness to Steve has nothing to do with posters being able to objectively post/think about analysis patterns. Alright I’ll play, I don’t know Aird and never met him and actually had a really “positive preconceived notion”of him based on his time at Penn State and generally liked the way he talked and the way he sold himself and sold recruits on his program and really thought he’ll take Indiana to new heights. Early on when people posted about rumors that something is going on at Indiana, I actually said it’s probably 1 or 2 disgruntled players that he didn’t recruit and are being replaced by his recruits. Then an article came out where they interviewed multiple players from both Maryland and Indiana (including some starters) giving detailed accounts of abuse they faced and now my opinion of him has completely shifted. Here’s an objective analysis of events and patterns for you. |
|
|
|
Post by vbidrottare on Jan 6, 2024 1:51:19 GMT -5
Good try on change of subject. I asked about applying consistent standards. I am asking for thinkers to disregard preconceived notions and to objectively analyze things. My closeness to Steve has nothing to do with posters being able to objectively post/think about analysis patterns. Alright I’ll play, I don’t know Aird and never met him and actually had a really “positive preconceived notion”of him based on his time at Penn State and generally liked the way he talked and the way he sold himself and sold recruits on his program and really thought he’ll take Indiana to new heights. Early on when people posted about rumors that something is going on at Indiana, I actually said it’s probably 1 or 2 disgruntled players that he didn’t recruit and are being replaced by his recruits. Then an article came out where they interviewed multiple players from both Maryland and Indiana (including some starters) giving detailed accounts of abuse they faced and now my opinion of him has completely shifted. Here’s an objective analysis of events and patterns for you. You are correct. Given a little time, more players felt more comfortable coming forward and giving their testimonies about Bloomington. What I am saying doesn’t discount any Indiana player’s experience; nor does it inflate any Purdue’s players experience. My point is that we can objectively analyze all of these reports……….. but that it doesn’t happen in the Purdue case because of the last name involved. My point has to do with the double standard that is ready to try to assassinate someone while simultaneously defending someone. |
|
|
|
Post by hangonsloopy on Jan 6, 2024 2:09:34 GMT -5
Alright I’ll play, I don’t know Aird and never met him and actually had a really “positive preconceived notion”of him based on his time at Penn State and generally liked the way he talked and the way he sold himself and sold recruits on his program and really thought he’ll take Indiana to new heights. Early on when people posted about rumors that something is going on at Indiana, I actually said it’s probably 1 or 2 disgruntled players that he didn’t recruit and are being replaced by his recruits. Then an article came out where they interviewed multiple players from both Maryland and Indiana (including some starters) giving detailed accounts of abuse they faced and now my opinion of him has completely shifted. Here’s an objective analysis of events and patterns for you. You are correct. Given a little time, more players felt more comfortable coming forward and giving their testimonies about Bloomington. What I am saying doesn’t discount any Indiana player’s experience; nor does it inflate any Purdue’s player’s experience. My point is that we can objectively analyze all of these reports……….. but that it doesn’t happen in the Purdue case because of the last name involved. My point has to do with the double standard that is ready to try to assassinate someone while simultaneously defending someone. Ok I wasn’t even aware that you’re the poster from the Shondell thread and trying to troll on this thread to make a point. Comparing those two cases doesn’t make any sense though. You’re the only person who’s spoken on the matter and have refused to provide any details. I don’t know Shondell either and I already said that the timing and manner of the departure was sus and that I wouldn’t be shocked if something came out later and that’s as much of an open mind that I can give you based on the very little information you’ve provided. Re-read my previous post and see how I came to my current conclusions on Aird and tell me you don’t see the massive difference in information and accounts provided. |
|
|
|
Post by ineedajob on Jan 6, 2024 2:19:55 GMT -5
Alright I’ll play, I don’t know Aird and never met him and actually had a really “positive preconceived notion”of him based on his time at Penn State and generally liked the way he talked and the way he sold himself and sold recruits on his program and really thought he’ll take Indiana to new heights. Early on when people posted about rumors that something is going on at Indiana, I actually said it’s probably 1 or 2 disgruntled players that he didn’t recruit and are being replaced by his recruits. Then an article came out where they interviewed multiple players from both Maryland and Indiana (including some starters) giving detailed accounts of abuse they faced and now my opinion of him has completely shifted. Here’s an objective analysis of events and patterns for you. My point is that we can objectively analyze all of these reports……….. but that it doesn’t happen in the Purdue case because of the last name involved. My point has to do with the double standard that is ready to try to assassinate someone while simultaneously defending someone. There hasn't been a report about the "Purdue case" yet. You might be right about the Shondells, and if you are, I hope they are exposed. However, you are the only person who has come forward and you haven't given us ANYTHING to work with the way that Idaho and Indiana have - absolutely no details about what "inappropriate behavior" actually consists of. Even before the Indiana Daily Student article, there were players and former players commenting on TikTok and other social media sources who actually detailed specific allegations about sweet potato fries and other dietary things. That is far more detailed than anything you've "alleged." |
|
|
|
Post by JT on Jan 6, 2024 2:30:33 GMT -5
My point is that we can objectively analyze all of these reports……….. but that it doesn’t happen in the Purdue case because of the last name involved. WHAT REPORTS?? (regarding Purdue and Shondell) Let's objectively analyze all the reports: - J.Shondell resigned for "personal reasons" which haven't been disclosed
- Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Continued... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Repeated... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- The same... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Umm...
- Umm...
- Umm...
Okay - OBJECTIVELY, I'm gonna assume the "personal reasons" aren't a sign of anything, because WE HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING. |
|
|
|
Post by rjaege on Jan 6, 2024 12:17:53 GMT -5
My point is that we can objectively analyze all of these reports……….. but that it doesn’t happen in the Purdue case because of the last name involved. WHAT REPORTS?? (regarding Purdue and Shondell) Let's objectively analyze all the reports: - J.Shondell resigned for "personal reasons" which haven't been disclosed
- Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Continued... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Repeated... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- The same... Unsupported allegations by an anonymous VT poster
- Umm...
- Umm...
- Umm...
Okay - OBJECTIVELY, I'm gonna assume the "personal reasons" aren't a sign of anything, because WE HAVEN'T SEEN ANYTHING. Objectivity is very subjective on VT... |
|
