|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 25, 2022 20:04:27 GMT -5
Good. To both. I’d love to know how the NCAA decided to pick out Bramschreiber, as opposed to the other names we’ve heard about. Anyway. We move on. She’ll still play a part this year. I’m pretty sure of it.
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Aug 25, 2022 20:44:07 GMT -5
Good. To both. I’d love to know how the NCAA decided to pick out Bramschreiber, as opposed to the other names we’ve heard about. Anyway. We move on. She’ll still play a part this year. I’m pretty sure of it. if Franklin roves to be a big threat from the back row I wonder if it'll be hard for Shanel to see the court. Especially if things are going well at that point
|
|
|
Post by savannahbadger on Aug 25, 2022 21:02:14 GMT -5
Shanel is getting Micah Potter’ed. seems like the typical punishment for a Wisconsin team, where other schools might not get the same scrutiny.
|
|
|
Post by taxidea on Aug 25, 2022 21:15:47 GMT -5
No idea badgerbreath . I would guess that someone found out she was interested in Wisconsin... reported that she was exploring pro options and that started the trouble. I dont know the ins and outs of the eligibility rules. (because she's not going to say it herself... or maybe I guess Wisconsin did it.... which is more likely) You're allowed to talk to agents... but I imagine specific contracts and teams were discussed/offered and that was the problem. Liberos do have overseas options. Most of them just arent that great Wow! To your point, I’m convinced that Wisconsin conferred deliberately and in complete transparency, with the ruling body to ensure compliance. Thatz been the UW’s MO. So with that… - Itz clear that senior SA’s talking to various pro agents has clearly been a common and perhaps, accepted practice heretofore, by the NCAA. Speculating here, but the arbitrary nature of this penalty, I believe, is the NCAA drawing a new line in the sand - putting all concerned on notice, going forward. Unfortunately for the Badgers and especially for SB, “you’re it”. - Oh well. As robtearle has pointed out, SB now becomes the first casualty of the 2022 season. I’m sure that Sheff has already game-planned for this. Does anyone really doubt it? - She’ll still be able to practice and solidify her role on the team before the B1G matches come on the schedule. Shez a great talent and will certainly contribute to the team’s tournament run. - I don’t know if there’s an appeal in process, or even possible. In the mean…Letz Go!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2022 21:17:27 GMT -5
DS is a possibility now but if we are jelling with Gülce/Boyer or Gülce/MacDonald than really not sure Shenal will see the floor after an entire half season of play.
With or without Shenal I saw a regression in this area from last season.
|
|
|
Post by slxpress on Aug 25, 2022 22:14:17 GMT -5
No idea badgerbreath . I would guess that someone found out she was interested in Wisconsin... reported that she was exploring pro options and that started the trouble. I dont know the ins and outs of the eligibility rules. (because she's not going to say it herself... or maybe I guess Wisconsin did it.... which is more likely) You're allowed to talk to agents... but I imagine specific contracts and teams were discussed/offered and that was the problem. Liberos do have overseas options. Most of them just arent that great Wow! To your point, I’m convinced that Wisconsin conferred deliberately and in complete transparency, with the ruling body to ensure compliance. Thatz been the UW’s MO. So with that… - Itz clear that senior SA’s talking to various pro agents has clearly been a common and perhaps, accepted practice heretofore, by the NCAA. Speculating here, but the arbitrary nature of this penalty, I believe, is the NCAA drawing a new line in the sand - putting all concerned on notice, going forward. Unfortunately for the Badgers and especially for SB, “you’re it”. - Oh well. As robtearle has pointed out, SB now becomes the first casualty of the 2022 season. I’m sure that Sheff has already game-planned for this. Does anyone really doubt it? - She’ll still be able to practice and solidify her role on the team before the B1G matches come on the schedule. Shez a great talent and will certainly contribute to the team’s tournament run. - I don’t know if there’s an appeal in process, or even possible. In the mean…Letz Go!! I don’t know about a line in the sand. There is a ton of discussion about liberalizing the rules even more. Of course, it’s not volleyball that’s the catalyst. It’s football and men’s basketball, and pressure to let kids revert back to a college career even while going further down the path of exploring a pro career. If there’s anything I can say about the NCAA and its ability to hand down punishments, it’s to not be transparent, hold things close to the vest, make the NCAA prove any and all allegations they make, and then if they’re serious enough, dispute them in every way possible by every means possible, including appeals and legal action. It’s my guess Wisconsin tried to be forthcoming about what transpired. The NCAA saw a violation of their rules they could actually document and penalize, and so they did. I’m sure for them this feels like a slap on the wrist, but Sheffield being the boss he is, calls them out for their BS. Honestly I’ve fallen in love with Sheffield and his willingness to throw the turd on the table with his tweets. He has a tremendous amount of BDE.
|
|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Aug 25, 2022 23:40:10 GMT -5
Some clarity - sounds like an appeal isn’t possible.
|
|
|
Post by babybacksets on Aug 26, 2022 1:27:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kearney Kingston on Aug 26, 2022 6:12:16 GMT -5
Wow! To your point, I’m convinced that Wisconsin conferred deliberately and in complete transparency, with the ruling body to ensure compliance. Thatz been the UW’s MO. So with that… - Itz clear that senior SA’s talking to various pro agents has clearly been a common and perhaps, accepted practice heretofore, by the NCAA. Speculating here, but the arbitrary nature of this penalty, I believe, is the NCAA drawing a new line in the sand - putting all concerned on notice, going forward. Unfortunately for the Badgers and especially for SB, “you’re it”. - Oh well. As robtearle has pointed out, SB now becomes the first casualty of the 2022 season. I’m sure that Sheff has already game-planned for this. Does anyone really doubt it? - She’ll still be able to practice and solidify her role on the team before the B1G matches come on the schedule. Shez a great talent and will certainly contribute to the team’s tournament run. - I don’t know if there’s an appeal in process, or even possible. In the mean…Letz Go!! I don’t know about a line in the sand. There is a ton of discussion about liberalizing the rules even more. Of course, it’s not volleyball that’s the catalyst. It’s football and men’s basketball, and pressure to let kids revert back to a college career even while going further down the path of exploring a pro career. If there’s anything I can say about the NCAA and its ability to hand down punishments, it’s to not be transparent, hold things close to the vest, make the NCAA prove any and all allegations they make, and then if they’re serious enough, dispute them in every way possible by every means possible, including appeals and legal action. It’s my guess Wisconsin tried to be forthcoming about what transpired. The NCAA saw a violation of their rules they could actually document and penalize, and so they did. I’m sure for them this feels like a slap on the wrist, but Sheffield being the boss he is, calls them out for their BS. Honestly I’ve fallen in love with Sheffield and his willingness to throw the turd on the table with his tweets. He has a tremendous amount of BDE. There is much speculation about facts that nobody truly understands. I agree with an earlier statement, why punish an athlete for having a contract with a pro agent, but not the actual pro athlete?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2022 6:37:22 GMT -5
Erasure? Loberg was great in spots but she was pointing out the Badgers 3 most consistently productive and accomplished players.
|
|
|
Post by savannahbadger on Aug 26, 2022 6:39:29 GMT -5
Speaking of which… Grace just put something up on IG about the NCAA outright denying her ability to transfer somewhere to play beach in the spring and finish her masters there (she was in the transfer portal). I don’t recall ever hearing about that until today.
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 26, 2022 7:15:17 GMT -5
Still mad about this. Nothing is worse than a decision that seems arbitrary. The NCAAs lack of transparency really hurts them in cases like these. Or maybe it is just as arbitrary as it seems.
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Aug 26, 2022 7:35:02 GMT -5
What do you want from the NCAA - a hand-written letter explaining their thought process. I’m sure the athlete and the school compliance office received the necessary info. Yes. It’s clear the student and her representative think the ruling is arbitrary. I’d like to hear the NCAAs argument for how it is consistent with their other rulings. I want a theory that SAs can understand in practice.
|
|
|
Post by Rowdy14 on Aug 26, 2022 8:07:37 GMT -5
From what I hear, us badger fans should be happy it's only 14 matches.
|
|
|
Post by robtearle on Aug 26, 2022 8:12:56 GMT -5
From what I hear, us badger fans should be happy it's only 14 matches. What is it you hear? Where did you hear it, and from whom?
|
|