|
Post by nikkigsmith on Jun 24, 2022 15:54:59 GMT -5
just cancel wisconsin fans and most of the problems go away loool thats too easy a solution. But a good one You are not gonna cancel me😂😂
|
|
|
Post by nikkigsmith on Jun 24, 2022 16:05:46 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2022 16:35:06 GMT -5
THESE ARE MUCH MORE PRESSING MATTERS THAN HANCOCK VS CARLINI VERSION 5.0! no there's not I hate you for this.
|
|
|
Post by HandeBallerdın on Jun 24, 2022 16:35:52 GMT -5
thats too easy a solution. But a good one You are not gonna cancel me😂😂 I cant. But he can
|
|
|
Post by memorybankrupt on Jun 24, 2022 16:44:18 GMT -5
I think Karch has to make sure he doesn’t alienate any of his three setters this early in the quad. I love all three, I stan for no one. But I think Hancock maxes out as #2 setter. If Carlini performs well, Karch has to keep her on the roster in final rounds and WCH. IMO JP and Carlini are only ones in consideration of #1 setter.
I could also see a scenario where JP doesn’t play as much early on if her injuries are not fully healed or if she’s not in the best condition yet. No need to rush her comeback.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2022 16:47:35 GMT -5
I fully support Rettke and Butler developing and making a push for Paris. I just think they need more time in the pros and aren't fully ready for this level yet. I don't think we will see them on the WCH roster. They are just not as fast to the pins Stevenson is. Hopefully they will get there in the next year or so. Karch is clearly invested in their long term development, which is awesome. im confused, do Rettke & Butler need more pro experience? Because Stevenson only has half a season on a middle of the pack team in a weak league……Or do they just need to be faster to the pins? Because if your observation is right Stevenson is getting there but not getting the block at the same rate as Butler & Rettke in this tournament. In the end, the match play we see is a factor in roster decisions, but the practice play we don’t see carries much more weight. I think all three need more pro experience but speed to the pins and getting soft block touches that lead to transition points are both things that Stevenson just does better than Rettke and Butler atm. Plus, Stevenson's speed in the back court and setting ability appears to be better to the eye test to me thus far. Granted, it's a small sample size we have gotten so far but I like having all three of them battling it out for roster spots moving forward. Competition by position makes the entire team better. Chi and Haleigh are still the undisputed starters with Tapp solidly in that 3rd slot IMO. I also think, much to many folks dismay, that Dixon is probably the 4th right now in Karch's eyes. Kumbaya is alive and well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2022 16:49:09 GMT -5
I think Karch has to make sure he doesn’t alienate any of his three setters this early in the quad. I love all three, I stan for no one. But I think Hancock maxes out as #2 setter. If Carlini performs well, Karch has to keep her on the roster in final rounds and WCH. IMO JP and Carlini are only ones in consideration of #1 setter. I could also see a scenario where JP doesn’t play as much early on if her injuries are not fully healed or if she’s not in the best condition yet. No need to rush her comeback. Not gonna lie, I kind of wanted to see JP rested for the entire VNL. Micha and Lauren are more than capable of leading this team. Edit: If JP isn't fully healthy and Karch and Co. bring her back too soon and she plays poorly because of it, I am going to be VERY disappointed and frankly, really angry. I'm not saying this is what is happening. Just my feelings on the subject. Him bringing a very injured Krob and not fully healthy Hill to Tokyo could have ended in disaster if one of Larson or MBH went down. Thankfully, that didn't happen.
|
|
|
Post by jiggs on Jun 24, 2022 16:50:34 GMT -5
I think Karch has to make sure he doesn’t alienate any of his three setters this early in the quad. I love all three, I stan for no one. But I think Hancock maxes out as #2 setter. If Carlini performs well, Karch has to keep her on the roster in final rounds and WCH. IMO JP and Carlini are only ones in consideration of #1 setter. I could also see a scenario where JP doesn’t play as much early on if her injuries are not fully healed or if she’s not in the best condition yet. No need to rush her comeback. do you guys think Karch asks his players who they would rather have set them?
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jun 24, 2022 16:52:53 GMT -5
I think Karch has to make sure he doesn’t alienate any of his three setters this early in the quad. I love all three, I stan for no one. But I think Hancock maxes out as #2 setter. If Carlini performs well, Karch has to keep her on the roster in final rounds and WCH. IMO JP and Carlini are only ones in consideration of #1 setter. I could also see a scenario where JP doesn’t play as much early on if her injuries are not fully healed or if she’s not in the best condition yet. No need to rush her comeback. do you guys think Karch asks his players who they would rather have set them? yes. Someone mentioned it in a podcast iirc
|
|
|
Post by jiggs on Jun 24, 2022 17:01:02 GMT -5
do you guys think Karch asks his players who they would rather have set them? yes. Someone mentioned it in a podcast iirc Ok, thank you .Thats interesting, the players might have actually preferred micha's setting then.
|
|
|
Post by taxidea on Jun 24, 2022 17:03:43 GMT -5
yes. Someone mentioned it in a podcast iirc Ok, thank you .Thats interesting, the players might have actually preferred micha's setting then. MEH… I still think itz her serve.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jun 24, 2022 17:05:12 GMT -5
Ok, thank you .Thats interesting, the players might have actually preferred micha's setting then. MEH… I still think itz her serve. the serve that he didn’t let her use for how many years?
|
|
|
Post by basil on Jun 24, 2022 17:06:16 GMT -5
do you guys think Karch asks his players who they would rather have set them? yes. Someone mentioned it in a podcast iirc yeah I think Larson said it on the CEV podcast or something like that
|
|
|
Post by taxidea on Jun 24, 2022 17:10:11 GMT -5
MEH… I still think itz her serve. the serve that he didn’t let her use for how many years? Karch is unpredictable to me. Seemed like she had the hammer out last week, so therez that.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jun 24, 2022 17:12:20 GMT -5
the serve that he didn’t let her use for how many years? Karch is unpredictable to me. Seemed like she had the hammer out last week, so therez that. i wouldn’t say unpredictable, maybe evolved. I don’t think her serve is why she was on the Olympic team. I mean I could say we know that. They never used it outside of the matches where she had to play bc of Poulter
|
|