|
Post by n00b on Jun 25, 2022 8:51:25 GMT -5
I think the view of the truck driving over top of a protestor is obscured (if it actually happened). I was going to post that we've seen what it looks like when a driver "plows" into people, both in Waukesha and Charlottesville, and this didn't pass the eye test for me. If someone is in front of my vehicle, my first reaction is TO STOP!lol Yes. Protesters trying to block you in is exactly equivalent to "someone in front of my vehicle".
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 8:55:07 GMT -5
It is the baton that he pushed her with. Fact is he assaulted an unarmed women for expressing her constitutional rights to protest. He definitely pushed her with his left hand. And regardless, saying a cop is "using a baton" is intentionally implying something more than pushing. He definitely threw an unarmed woman to the ground.
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Jun 25, 2022 8:55:38 GMT -5
He definitely pushed her with his left hand. And regardless, saying a cop is "using a baton" is intentionally implying something more than pushing. He definitely threw an unarmed woman to the ground. Agreed! Thank you for backpedaling to the truth.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 8:57:38 GMT -5
It is the baton that he pushed her with. Fact is he assaulted an unarmed women for expressing her constitutional rights to protest. Sorry moody, you're 0-2. He does not use the baton to push her, her uses his left hand. She is not protesting, she is covering the incident of someone else being taken into custody as a reporter. Oh and your "fact" is not a fact so I guess it's actually 0-3. REGARDLESS... if a police officer tells someone to back-up so that their fellow officers can do their job unimpeded, it would behoove a person to do what they say and back-up. Did you get permission from dunc to respond to me? I always do love when you try to keep score. Such a lame response. It is amazing how you are so willing to allow your constitutional rights to be literally trampled. What "police job" was she preventing anyone from doing standing on a sidewalk legally protesting?
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 8:58:07 GMT -5
He definitely threw an unarmed woman to the ground. Agreed! Thank you for backpedaling to the truth. assault is assault.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 8:59:33 GMT -5
If someone is in front of my vehicle, my first reaction is TO STOP!lol Yes. Protesters trying to block you in is exactly equivalent to "someone in front of my vehicle". So this person wasn't in front of the truck?
|
|
|
Post by AmeriCanVBfan on Jun 25, 2022 9:08:57 GMT -5
Sorry moody, you're 0-2. He does not use the baton to push her, her uses his left hand. She is not protesting, she is covering the incident of someone else being taken into custody as a reporter. Oh and your "fact" is not a fact so I guess it's actually 0-3. REGARDLESS... if a police officer tells someone to back-up so that their fellow officers can do their job unimpeded, it would behoove a person to do what they say and back-up. Did you get permission from dunc to respond to me? I always do love when you try to keep score. Such a lame response. It is amazing how you are so willing to allow your constitutional rights to be literally trampled. What "police job" was she preventing anyone from doing standing on a sidewalk legally protesting? I'm always amazed at how much you can get wrong in one sentence. The "police job", as you put it, was already described. Go back and read or go back and watch. She has every right to cover what's happening but that doesn't mean she can be in the middle of what's going on. She thought she could and she was wrong. And don't intentionally use Ableist language. I know you like to, but you could try and curb that.
|
|
|
Post by BeachbytheBay on Jun 25, 2022 9:30:27 GMT -5
Did you get permission from dunc to respond to me? I always do love when you try to keep score. Such a lame response. It is amazing how you are so willing to allow your constitutional rights to be literally trampled. What "police job" was she preventing anyone from doing standing on a sidewalk legally protesting? I'm always amazed at how much you can get wrong in one sentence. The "police job", as you put it, was already described. Go back and read or go back and watch. She has every right to cover what's happening but that doesn't mean she can be in the middle of what's going on. She thought she could and she was wrong. And don't intentionally use Ableist language. I know you like to, but you could try and curb that. I wouldn't even call her a reporter. She has a podcast. She's an opinionater. Not sure how many actually news reporters are left out there. News Reporters don't try to make themselves the story
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Jun 25, 2022 9:31:46 GMT -5
I mean, we can all watch the video on repeat. The officer clearly didn't use his baton. It is the baton that he pushed her with. Fact is he assaulted an unarmed women for expressing her constitutional rights to protest. She will learn not to interfere again. It’s called Toughlove moody something you should’ve had from your parents.
|
|
|
Post by valleyvolley1 on Jun 25, 2022 9:37:04 GMT -5
What a loser and a liar, typical of the people you side with. You are the angry one. You hate God, Christians and anyone that is not a communist, but love those who want to bring freedom and liberty down. No kids either, better for the world though. lol, dude you have no clue, I'm a Republican, you know, we believe in freedom of the individual and take our cues from Lincoln, abd not a Trump false idol worshiper. And base beliefs on Christianity which is not to hate. and have a great kid, but then you have no clue. loser, liar....there you go. all you got is name calling ....ass, idiot, loser...I'm sure there'll be more your responses are soooo intelligent. you disagree and then name call. apparently 'pigeon-hole' people you disagree with because of anger management issues so you make it convenient to label people to fit your narrative. I disagree so therefore I must be a communist, lol. whether it's Trump or AOC - it's similar to just control people and dictate their life...control freaks like you, Trump, Cruz, Warren, AOC. they're not Repubs or Dems, they are just extremists who are control freaks like you at heart. you don't have anything to do with liberty, apparently you think being a storm trooper is the way to go. If you had the power you lust, you'd probably go down that path of rounding up those you disagree with and putting them in concentration camps, as history turns out for those egomaniacs like Hitler, Stalin, PUtin, Xi, and Trump would as well if left to his own devices as the man you worship churns through anyone and everyone and eventually tries to ruin them when he has no further use for them yeah, your man Trump loves freedom and liberty, right, lol. so much so he wants to trample all over America and Democracy. but believe what you want, as you do, in your own hyped up comfort world Another idiotic post, again I didn't vote for Trump, but you seems to jump to idiotic convlusions.. why be stupid all the time?
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Jun 25, 2022 9:40:40 GMT -5
I'm always amazed at how much you can get wrong in one sentence. The "police job", as you put it, was already described. Go back and read or go back and watch. She has every right to cover what's happening but that doesn't mean she can be in the middle of what's going on. She thought she could and she was wrong. And don't intentionally use Ableist language. I know you like to, but you could try and curb that. I wouldn't even call her a reporter. She has a podcast. She's an opinionater. Not sure how many actually news reporters are left out there. News Reporters don't try to make themselves the story Anyone is a reporter these days according to Democrats. They constantly post random people from Twitter as if it’s gospel. That’s how desperate they are.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 9:52:32 GMT -5
Did you get permission from dunc to respond to me? I always do love when you try to keep score. Such a lame response. It is amazing how you are so willing to allow your constitutional rights to be literally trampled. What "police job" was she preventing anyone from doing standing on a sidewalk legally protesting? I'm always amazed at how much you can get wrong in one sentence. The "police job", as you put it, was already described. Go back and read or go back and watch. She has every right to cover what's happening but that doesn't mean she can be in the middle of what's going on. She thought she could and she was wrong. And don't intentionally use Ableist language. I know you like to, but you could try and curb that. swing and a miss. Wrong again on all counts. Stop trying to use big words you don't understand. It makes you look foolish.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 9:53:31 GMT -5
I wouldn't even call her a reporter. She has a podcast. She's an opinionater. Not sure how many actually news reporters are left out there. News Reporters don't try to make themselves the story Anyone is a reporter these days according to Democrats. They constantly post random people from Twitter as if it’s gospel. That’s how desperate they are. It doesn't matter her job. She was assaulted by that cop.
|
|
moody
Banned
Posts: 18,679
|
Post by moody on Jun 25, 2022 9:57:25 GMT -5
It is the baton that he pushed her with. Fact is he assaulted an unarmed women for expressing her constitutional rights to protest. She will learn not to interfere again. It’s called Toughlove moody something you should’ve had from your parents. It's called assault, ya little twerp.
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Jun 25, 2022 10:09:35 GMT -5
Anyone is a reporter these days according to Democrats. They constantly post random people from Twitter as if it’s gospel. That’s how desperate they are. It doesn't matter her job. She was assaulted by that cop. Maybe she will learn next time to get the hell out of the way. She sounds like an idiot. As most young Democrats are.
|
|