|
|
Post by Fight On! on Aug 18, 2022 0:10:30 GMT -5
Let me cry for you. You’re unnecessarily denigrating a good post and being nasty about it, frankly. Then you whine when getting called out. Take your negative pettiness elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Post by BeachbytheBay on Aug 18, 2022 0:33:28 GMT -5
Let me cry for you. You’re unnecessarily denigrating a good post and being nasty about it, frankly. Then you whine when getting called out. Take your negative pettiness elsewhere. yep, vitriol |
|
|
|
Post by oldnewbie on Aug 18, 2022 0:35:54 GMT -5
Is it perfect, no? But it uses this year’s schedule, so it is Futures more than bygones. well, once it actually uses this years data it will be futures. this year's schedule is not performance data...but we are quibbling - it's premature until we get decent data this year as I said polls are better data than last year's RPI especially with 350 odd teams It is based on all of the actual schedules for this year. That is an s ton of this years data that took a good amount of effort to compile and make available so that we have some measure of comparing schedules and schedule strength. I have no idea how else I could do that without having this available. For what it is it is very useful and interesting. Don't use a screw driver to drive a nail, and then complain that the screwdriver is useless. |
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Aug 18, 2022 0:43:13 GMT -5
Let me cry for you. You’re unnecessarily denigrating a good post and being nasty about it, frankly. Then you whine when getting called out. Take your negative pettiness elsewhere. yep, vitriol Then, I accept. I prefer to respond to your inane posts with vitriol than to be inane. |
|
|
|
Post by BeachbytheBay on Aug 18, 2022 0:53:17 GMT -5
Then, I accept. I prefer to respond to your inane posts with vitriol than to be inane. Good for you, vitriol and inane. |
|
|
|
Post by n00b on Aug 30, 2022 8:04:44 GMT -5
Week 1?
|
|
|
|
Post by vballfan17 on Aug 30, 2022 8:25:43 GMT -5
|
|
