|
Post by donut on Sept 14, 2022 15:18:00 GMT -5
do you have queen oglivie's passing numbers Rubin 2.42, 71.9 GP% on 32 attempts
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Sept 14, 2022 15:21:27 GMT -5
Rubin 2.42, 71.9 GP% on 32 attempts Kubik's my passing queen. 2.39, 65.5 GP% on the season with way more attempts than the next. Rubin's off to a good start though, she's already really valuable to this Stanford squad.
|
|
|
Post by nellynel on Sept 14, 2022 15:23:24 GMT -5
At least Baird had a good passing day considering she didn’t attack well.
|
|
|
Post by hammer on Sept 14, 2022 15:23:39 GMT -5
Rubin 2.42, 71.9 GP% on 32 attempts Yes, but assuming this is VolleyMetrics, which is AI based, you have to adjust based upon human grading. VolleyMetrics does give a decent first approximation of how someone passed though.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Sept 14, 2022 15:24:09 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2022 15:25:22 GMT -5
donut , one more post please
|
|
|
Post by basil on Sept 14, 2022 15:26:32 GMT -5
At least Baird had a good passing day considering she didn’t attack well. those passing stats are not good unless you're being sarcastic lol
|
|
|
Post by donut on Sept 14, 2022 15:27:08 GMT -5
donut , one more post please ... what?
|
|
|
Post by Kingsley on Sept 14, 2022 15:27:49 GMT -5
donut , one more post please ... what? 10,000
|
|
|
Post by Reach on Sept 14, 2022 15:30:05 GMT -5
time to delete and start over
|
|
|
Post by hipsterfilth on Sept 14, 2022 15:36:11 GMT -5
At least Baird had a good passing day considering she didn’t attack well. When you judge passing on a 2.0 scale, Baird is truly our kween.
|
|
|
Post by nellynel on Sept 14, 2022 15:37:06 GMT -5
At least Baird had a good passing day considering she didn’t attack well. those passing stats are not good unless you're being sarcastic lol After all this time no one still gets my sarcasm. 😔 That’s it I’m bringing back the disclaimer.
|
|
|
Post by donut on Sept 14, 2022 15:39:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by donut on Sept 14, 2022 15:39:27 GMT -5
time to delete and start over plot twist: I am actually holiday and have 8 accounts on retainer
|
|
|
Post by nonathleticperson on Sept 14, 2022 15:43:33 GMT -5
Honest question since I'm a bit out of touch with NCAA nowadays... Miner is an elite setter? She was spraying tempo ball to both wings.
Both Miner AND Orr (being in the same class) were being hyped as the the next great setters in the NCAA that nobody could touch, they were just THAT GOOD... 1 and 2 according to those that put a bunch of stock in the junior usav teams. Now, sure they still have years to improve sure, but it's very clear that, for a variety of reasons, the prognosticators were wrong. And, it's not just about those two, I mean, Batenhorst played high level USAV junior ball and attacked well, and you couldn't kind a bigger OH threat in club than Krause (who also spent a lot of time in the USAV gym at the junior levels)...yet again, for...reasons, neither have been consistent at the NCAA level and both have been passed up by a player who didn't get the USAV love that they did a mere two/three years ago. I say this not to suggest that these players are bad or overrated, only to point out that people on this board continue to gush that pretty much the entire U19 team is going to Nebraska in the future and while that recruiting is certainly exceptional, they aren't the only great players out there and being a good prep fit for what the USAV junior teams want to do doesn't mean that the player will dominate in college.
Orr as in Nebraska Orr? The girl who was subbed in last night and clubbed the ball like a baby seal every contact was ranked #2??? Oof... Both look great athletically but both have some major issues with their touch.
|
|