|
Post by juancook on Oct 9, 2023 14:17:55 GMT -5
BIG Ten Weekly Awards - Week 7
Player of the Week - Lindsay Krause, Nebraska
Defensive Player of the Week - Caroline Crawford, Wisconsin
Setter of the Week - Alyssa Nayar, Rutgers
Freshman of the Week - Chloe Chicoine, Purdue
Congrats to all the winners, especially Linda!
|
|
|
Post by donaldjamesparker on Oct 9, 2023 16:44:43 GMT -5
BIG Ten Weekly Awards - Week 7
Player of the Week - Lindsay Krause, Nebraska Defensive Player of the Week - Caroline Crawford, Wisconsin Setter of the Week - Alyssa Nayar, Rutgers Freshman of the Week - Chloe Chicoine, Purdue Congrats to all the winners, especially Linda! The Big 10 news page has Chicoine as a setter from Sioux Falls, SD. It appears someone failed to proofread their work. It also lists Krause as an opposite hitter, which is not quite as glaring as an error. As a South Dakota native, I welcome the publicity for my native state - but Chloe's home town probably would like that error corrected. Also just notice the setter for the week is listed as a Middle Blocker. Obviously, the creator of this page used information from a previous document (perhaps a copy and paste operation) and failed to update/delete it.
|
|
|
Post by bprtbone on Oct 15, 2023 14:57:56 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
|
|
|
Post by badgerbyproxy on Oct 15, 2023 15:04:54 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
3 tops and 11 bottoms? Sounds about right.
|
|
|
B1G 2023
Oct 15, 2023 15:40:55 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by mrshusker on Oct 15, 2023 15:40:55 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/7/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 6-0 | 15-0 | Penn State | 6-0 | 12-3 | Wisconsin | 6-0 | 15-0 | Purdue | 4-2 | 10-5 | Indiana | 3-3 | 13-6 | Maryland | 3-3 | 13-5 | Michigan State | 3-3 | 11-6 | Ohio State | 3-3 | 6-9 | Illinois | 2-4 | 7-9 | Minnesota | 2-4 | 6-8 | Northwestern | 2-4 | 8-8 | Michigan | 1-5 | 3-12 | Rutgers | 1-5 | 9-7 | Iowa | 0-6 | 8-10 |
Conference set Records: Wisconsin. 18-0 Nebraska. 18-4 Penn State. 18-5 Does this stat actually mean anything?
|
|
|
B1G 2023
Oct 15, 2023 15:56:02 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by bruinsgold on Oct 15, 2023 15:56:02 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
3 tops and 11 bottoms? Sounds about right.
|
|
|
Post by volleyl0ver on Oct 15, 2023 15:58:17 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
Indianas 3 losses are to the top 3 teams. They only have to play Wisconsin again. Very likely they finish top 5 this year
|
|
|
Post by tablealgebra on Oct 15, 2023 16:05:17 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
Indianas 3 losses are to the top 3 teams. They only have to play Wisconsin again. Very likely they finish top 5 this year Meanwhile, it's hard to imagine OSU finishing over .500 and Minnesota actually looks in danger of missing that cutoff. Meaning the B1G has 3 hosts, 2 marginally seeded/unseeded NCAA teams and maybe two bubble teams. Looking like a 5 bid conference right about now.
|
|
|
Post by 25or624 on Oct 15, 2023 16:14:42 GMT -5
Conference set Records: Wisconsin. 18-0 Nebraska. 18-4 Penn State. 18-5 Does this stat actually mean anything? Only if you want to argue with someone on VT and you need some putative evidence to support your position. I think it's only a matter of time before we see it used in a "Nebraska or Wisconsin at #1" argument.
|
|
|
Post by exit237a on Oct 15, 2023 16:31:13 GMT -5
B1G Standings - 10/15/23 Team | Conference | Overall | Nebraska | 8-0 | 17-0 | Wisconsin | 8-0 | 17-0 | Penn State | 7-1 | 13-4 | Indiana | 5-3 | 15-6 | Purdue | 5-3 | 11-6 | Michigan State | 4-4 | 12-7 | Minnesota | 4-4 | 8-8 | Ohio State | 4-4 | 7-10 | Illinois | 3-5 | 8-10 | Maryland | 3-5 | 13-7 | Northwestern | 3-5 | 9-9 | Michigan | 1-7 | 3-14 | Rutgers | 1-7 | 9-9 | Iowa | 0-8 | 8-12 |
Thanks for keeping us updated every week, bprtbone!
|
|
|
Post by tedheise on Oct 15, 2023 16:48:52 GMT -5
Does this stat actually mean anything? Only if you want to argue with someone on VT and you need some putative evidence to support your position. I think it's only a matter of time before we see it used in a "Nebraska or Wisconsin at #1" argument. I think we'll know the result of the first head to head before that argument gets a lot of traction. Haven't yet seen anyone seriously argue that Nebraska should be ranked ahead of Wisconsin, and that's as it should be based on evidence to date.
|
|
|
B1G 2023
Oct 15, 2023 17:05:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by mrshusker on Oct 15, 2023 17:05:11 GMT -5
Only if you want to argue with someone on VT and you need some putative evidence to support your position. I think it's only a matter of time before we see it used in a "Nebraska or Wisconsin at #1" argument. I think we'll know the result of the first head to head before that argument gets a lot of traction. Haven't yet seen anyone seriously argue that Nebraska should be ranked ahead of Wisconsin, and that's as it should be based on evidence to date. Not trying to get ahead of myself but if Nebraska and Wisconsin happen to split their matches, it doesn’t come down to sets won/loss for B1G champ. Is that correct? That’s what I mean by it doesn’t actually mean anything.
|
|
|
Post by gibbyb1 on Oct 15, 2023 18:25:48 GMT -5
I think we'll know the result of the first head to head before that argument gets a lot of traction. Haven't yet seen anyone seriously argue that Nebraska should be ranked ahead of Wisconsin, and that's as it should be based on evidence to date. Not trying to get ahead of myself but if Nebraska and Wisconsin happen to split their matches, it doesn’t come down to sets won/loss for B1G champ. Is that correct? That’s what I mean by it doesn’t actually mean anything. I believe they’d be co-champs, a tie breaker would be added for automatic bid purposes only.
|
|
|
B1G 2023
Oct 15, 2023 18:32:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by bborr on Oct 15, 2023 18:32:11 GMT -5
Not trying to get ahead of myself but if Nebraska and Wisconsin happen to split their matches, it doesn’t come down to sets won/loss for B1G champ. Is that correct? That’s what I mean by it doesn’t actually mean anything. I believe they’d be co-champs, a tie breaker would be added for automatic bid purposes only. No official meaning. All the stat shows is how amazingly dominant Wisconsin has been in conference play. And it may suggest who should be favored next Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by 25or624 on Oct 15, 2023 18:52:41 GMT -5
I think we'll know the result of the first head to head before that argument gets a lot of traction. Haven't yet seen anyone seriously argue that Nebraska should be ranked ahead of Wisconsin, and that's as it should be based on evidence to date. Not trying to get ahead of myself but if Nebraska and Wisconsin happen to split their matches, it doesn’t come down to sets won/loss for B1G champ. Is that correct? That’s what I mean by it doesn’t actually mean anything. We don't want this kind of stat making its way to, e.g., Michaela Chester; anything could happen.
|
|