|
|
Post by rainbowbadger on Oct 23, 2023 12:22:43 GMT -5
Bad week for me last week. Hoping to bounce back.
|
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 12:29:40 GMT -5
the spreadsheet says you win 3-2? It looks like someone changed Cassie Davis' numbers to values that weren't even close to one of her matches (the North Dakota State one). I'll look on the official NCAA site and double check the numbers, but anyone else can re-count our match if they want. I should win 4-1, only losing kills. no biggie, I was just looking at what the spreadsheet said last night when I was updating the standings. I'll change to 4-1 and adjust the points. FWIW, I don't think any admin is independently verifying all the numbers, we'd only recount if there is a dispute. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 12:38:11 GMT -5
Aces
#1 4.72 eazy Week 1
#2 4.59 vballfan17 Week 6
#3 4.5 vballfreak808 Week 1
#4 4.31 vballfan17 Week 9
#5 4.05 rainbowbadger Week 7
The fact that my name isn't somewhere on this list is unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
Post by vballfan17 on Oct 23, 2023 12:40:26 GMT -5
Aces
#1 4.72 eazy Week 1
#2 4.59 vballfan17 Week 6
#3 4.5 vballfreak808 Week 1
#4 4.31 vballfan17 Week 9
#5 4.05 rainbowbadger Week 7The fact that my name isn't somewhere on this list is unacceptable. I believe you'd be #10 on this list from week 4 when you had 3.65 aces/set. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 12:48:00 GMT -5
Aces
#1 4.72 eazy Week 1
#2 4.59 vballfan17 Week 6
#3 4.5 vballfreak808 Week 1
#4 4.31 vballfan17 Week 9
#5 4.05 rainbowbadger Week 7The fact that my name isn't somewhere on this list is unacceptable. I believe you'd be #10 on this list from week 4 when you had 3.65 aces/set. From last year, Aces for sure had the largest difference between the average (2.8)/median (2.72) of all the winners each week, and the median (3.87) of the top team each week. Being higher than the average/median each week is surely the goal, as it puts you in a position to win that category over 50% of the time among the 7 winners of that category in any given week - so at that point it's just about WHO you are matched up against. You just have to be lucky enough to NOT get matched up against the top ace team of the week, because the top team each week is usually getting A LOT of aces. |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 12:49:20 GMT -5
Aces
#1 4.72 eazy Week 1
#2 4.59 vballfan17 Week 6
#3 4.5 vballfreak808 Week 1
#4 4.31 vballfan17 Week 9
#5 4.05 rainbowbadger Week 7The fact that my name isn't somewhere on this list is unacceptable. I believe you'd be #10 on this list from week 4 when you had 3.65 aces/set. Alright team, lets get in the top 5 this week! |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 12:51:25 GMT -5
I wish I had two more add/drops left. My entire post draft game has been abysmal. I have 2. What’s it worth to you? Also, assuming this would even be allowed, I dunno that there is anything I could give you of fair trade value  |
|
|
|
Post by huskerpower on Oct 23, 2023 14:03:21 GMT -5
Add: Jaden Walz, S, Bowling Green
Drop: Isabella D'Amico, S, Georgia Tech
|
|
|
|
Post by Fight On! on Oct 23, 2023 14:38:35 GMT -5
I am on vacation in Mexico.
Do any of my players not have matches this week 🤡?
|
|
|
|
Post by vballfan17 on Oct 23, 2023 16:43:11 GMT -5
So just because I was randomly thinking about this... with us having 16 players on our full roster this year, was any thought given to expanding the number of players on our active weekly rosters from 10 to 12 players? Not sure if that would essentially mean 5 "Any" position players, or if we'd require 4 OH/OPPs, 3 MBs, 2 S, 1 L and then 2 "Any" position players. It'd just give the opportunity to play more players since currently over 1/3 of our roster is on the bench. Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Post by ay2013 on Oct 23, 2023 16:50:23 GMT -5
So just because I was randomly thinking about this... with us having 16 players on our full roster this year, was any thought given to expanding the number of players on our active weekly rosters from 10 to 12 players? Not sure if that would essentially mean 5 "Any" position players, or if we'd require 4 OH/OPPs, 3 MBs, 2 S, 1 L and then 2 "Any" position players. It'd just give the opportunity to play more players since currently over 1/3 of our roster is on the bench. Thoughts? The thought behind expanding the bench was to account for player injury and to mitigate the need for an expanded free add/drop window. In the past, a player who went out for a few weeks would likely be dropped, but with an expanded roster, it allows you to keep them without having to use an add/drop. Essentially having a spot or two on your full roster as a "wait and see". Personally, I've liked having an expanded bench, so any additions to the active roster should come with additions to the total roster size. |
|
|
|
Post by vballfan17 on Oct 23, 2023 16:51:25 GMT -5
The thought behind expanding the bench was to account for player injury and to mitigate the need for an expanded free add/drop window. In the past, a player who went out for a few weeks would likely be dropped, but with an expanded roster, it allows you to keep them without having to use an add/drop. Essentially having a spot or two on your full roster as a "wait and see". Personally, I've liked having an expanded bench, so any additions to the active roster should come with additions to the total roster size. Heck, let's just make it an even 20-player roster  |
|
|
|
Post by vballfan17 on Oct 23, 2023 17:01:37 GMT -5
Lot of revenge add/drop matches to note: Last week, I faced vballfreak808 with Lauryn Hovey who came through with 1.11 aces/set. eazy also defeated @madden55 with Beason putting up some nice numbers. This week, I face uofaGRAD with Wessling. Also, trojansc is facing ay2013 with Izzi Strand, and trojansc faces me with Yarich. Next week, I'll face rainbowbadger with Kaylee Cox. Just some, but probably missing others |
|
|
|
Post by eazy on Oct 23, 2023 17:44:19 GMT -5
So just because I was randomly thinking about this... with us having 16 players on our full roster this year, was any thought given to expanding the number of players on our active weekly rosters from 10 to 12 players? Not sure if that would essentially mean 5 "Any" position players, or if we'd require 4 OH/OPPs, 3 MBs, 2 S, 1 L and then 2 "Any" position players. It'd just give the opportunity to play more players since currently over 1/3 of our roster is on the bench. Thoughts? This was the thought that I had.. I am slightly in favor of expanding weekly to 12, but if we do I would feel strongly that having 2 'Any' position players is better than 5. It would likely lead to 6 setters being played per team, and there are just not enough 5-1 setters to make that work for an entire league. I liked one 'Any' position because it was simple, some people like 3 'Any' because it allows for more strategy. I don't think adding to 5 would add much more strategy, but would cause issues like mentioned above. |
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Oct 23, 2023 17:54:24 GMT -5
This was the thought that I had.. I am slightly in favor of expanding weekly to 12, but if we do I would feel strongly that having 2 'Any' position players is better than 5. It would likely lead to 6 setters being played per team, and there are just not enough 5-1 setters to make that work for an entire league. I liked one 'Any' position because it was simple, some people like 3 'Any' because it allows for more strategy. I don't think adding to 5 would add much more strategy, but would cause issues like mentioned above. im definitely anti 1 any. i'd rather have locked lineup structure at that point tbh (say 4OH, 3MB, 2S, 1L, or 5OH, 3MB, 2S, 2L). i think if we expanded to 12, my preferred lineup structure would be something like: 4OH, 2MB, 2S, 2L, 2 ANY. 4S and 6OH would still be the maximum amount played. |
|
