|
|
Post by oldnewbie on Sept 6, 2023 19:23:26 GMT -5
I'm well aware of what "inconclusive" means. I never said where the play was from. That wasn't the point. Are you calling this play inconclusive? If you're using those stills, yes. They aren't stills. They are individual frames from video. This is from one of the really long reviews which was ruled inconclusive. From this, you can tell just how bad a call has to be on the floor in order to be overturned, yet many calls were overturned. That is how bad the reffing has to be to overturn calls with this resolution. That also causes the team on the wrong of the reffing to burn challenges. It's not fun, but it is a good learning experience that you can't relax because you have to be that much better in certain environments. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Sept 6, 2023 19:37:52 GMT -5
If you're using those stills, yes. They aren't stills. They are individual frames from video. This is from one of the really long reviews which was ruled inconclusive. From this, you can tell just how bad a call has to be on the floor in order to be overturned, yet many calls were overturned. That is how bad the reffing has to be to overturn calls with this resolution. That also causes the team on the wrong of the reffing to burn challenges. It's not fun, but it is a good learning experience that you can't relax because you have to be that much better in certain environments. Thank you. Bad calls are made in every sport, multiple times per game. There is no home advantage on calls. That was my initial point. I know the down ref, btw. He is a fair guy and was only trying to do his best. USC didn't lose because of bad officiating. |
|
|
|
Post by dd2000 on Sept 6, 2023 19:41:43 GMT -5
Your blurry image is stupid. You can't tell if that "ball" is on the floor or 4 feet off the ground. Look at the REAL match footage. Its available on line. You can look at it from several angles. You can look at it in real time. You can look at it in slow motion. You can make your own call. No one cares what your opinion is on the calls. No one cares about your silly drawings on a silly blue floor. When no one takes the bait, it might be time to move on. I didn't give my opinion. There are no "silly drawings" on this "REAL match footage". Slow motion doesn't change the number of frames. They still go frame by fuzzy frame. I find it hilarious that you fight so hard against having any opinion when you don't know the play and don't know which way you want it to go. You take one still frame from a video. You can't tell if the ball is on its way down or up, on the floor or off the floor, and you want people to draw conclusions about it. Hilarious. At least with video you can see the trajectory of the ball, and know when that trajectory changes from moving down, hitting the floor, and then moving up again. But feel free to use that still shot and draw conclusions. Unless you can show that this frame from the video is at the point of the ball hitting the floor, and not after the ball hits the floor, its useless. And its the reason the refs look at video evidence, not single frame "evidence". |
|
|
|
Post by oldnewbie on Sept 6, 2023 19:49:39 GMT -5
They aren't stills. They are individual frames from video. This is from one of the really long reviews which was ruled inconclusive. From this, you can tell just how bad a call has to be on the floor in order to be overturned, yet many calls were overturned. That is how bad the reffing has to be to overturn calls with this resolution. That also causes the team on the wrong of the reffing to burn challenges. It's not fun, but it is a good learning experience that you can't relax because you have to be that much better in certain environments. Thank you. Bad calls are made in every sport, multiple times per game. There is no home advantage on calls. That was my initial point. I know the down ref, btw. He is a fair guy and was only trying to do his best. USC didn't lose because of bad officiating. Bad calls are often made, not always. There is absolutely a home advantage on calls, in many sports in many venues. I never said the down ref was not a fair guy or not trying to do his best. USC lost because of consistently bleeding points through sloppy play. If Hawaii lost you could say pretty much they same thing in reverse, though I thought in general Hawaii was a step better in passing and defense throughout the weekend. I thought both teams got steadily better and played a lot better in the last game on Saturday than they were playing in the first game on Thursday. I hope that is true and both continue to improve. I'd love to see you kick UCLA's ass this weekend. |
|
|
|
Post by Barefoot In Kailua on Sept 6, 2023 20:00:29 GMT -5
Bad calls are made in every sport, multiple times per game. There is no home advantage on calls. That was my initial point. I know the down ref, btw. He is a fair guy and was only trying to do his best. USC didn't lose because of bad officiating. Bad calls are often made, not always. There is absolutely a home advantage on calls, in many sports in many venues. I never said the down ref was not a fair guy or not trying to do his best. USC lost because of consistently bleeding points through sloppy play. If Hawaii lost you could say pretty much they same thing in reverse, though I thought in general Hawaii was a step better in passing and defense throughout the weekend. I thought both teams got steadily better and played a lot better in the last game on Saturday than they were playing in the first game on Thursday. I hope that is true and both continue to improve. I'd love to see you kick UCLA's ass this weekend. I've haven't seen Hawai'i get a home advantage on calls, if anything, it seems like the officials try too hard to be fair. I hope Hawai'i beats UCLA too. |
|
|
|
Post by Gladys Kravitz on Sept 7, 2023 8:13:14 GMT -5
I didn't give my opinion. You know nothing |
|
