#10 Arkansas at #19 Florida | Sun. 10/29 1pm E | SECN+

[Deleted]

How can you review you that

[volleyl0ver]

Home cookin for florida

[chenny11]

What’s going on lol

[jwvolley]

I'm confused

[badgerbreath]

I do not get that call at all.

[hammer]

Oct 29, 2023 13:27:19 GMT -5 volleyl0ver said:

Home cookin for florida

Looks like it

[mln59]

didn't know that could be challenged

[vballspectator]

Pretty sure what they challenged isn't challengeable but if that's what it takes for Florida to win a set I guess lol

[badgerbreath]

Setter was front row and above the net and so an attacker, the ball was in the plane, the Arkansas blocker touched the ball while the setter was trying to set it. Should be play on, right?

[katn]

that was bs...let's go hogs

[hammer]

Oct 29, 2023 13:28:45 GMT -5 vballspectator said:

Pretty sure what they challenged isn't challengeable but if that's what it takes for Florida to win a set I guess lol

It wasn't an official challenge ... R2 talked to the R1 and they decided ball did not penetrate the plain, therefore setter interference

[trojansc]

While replay reviews are generally sketchy in Gainesville, this one isn't. They weren't looking at the over (you can't). You can challenge a touch. This is why double-contacts and 4 touches ARE reviewable, you are reviewing if a touch occurred, not if that touch was a double, or not if that touch was over the net. Original rulings are what's important here.

[vballspectator]

I've watched a lot of matches this year and every time someone interferes with the set they say that the call isn't reviewable. It's like how a double isn't reviewed, it's subjective

[GatorsChomp]

oh my god HIT at HOGUE

[agean09]

Muff please stop setting AC. It is not her night