|
Post by Kearney Kingston on May 2, 2024 13:03:47 GMT -5
No college coaches need to be with USA working with the top recruitable athletes. There are some coaches who have proven to be more trustworthy than others, but non need to be surrounded by high school athletes. Rubbish…. Those coaches are coaching in the colleges because they are the best coaches…do we not want our best coaches coaching our best young players? I do believe we have enough elite young coaches that no head coaches should be coaching these age group teams. Morrison and Olmstead should not be coaching these teams. It should be the best non-head college coaches and maybe assign retired coaches like Mick Haley, Geoff Carlston, Tom Hilbert ect… to be available for advice. That’s the beautiful thing about this forum. Everybody is allowed an opinion. The six to eight training sessions these coaches spend with their 15-17 year-old athletes will not develop them into great players or a great team. However, coaches spending six to eight days with athletes can influence a college decision. I believe there are plenty of retired DI coaches, club coaches, and HS coaches who can take these rosters and meet preferred results. Again, just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by knapplc on May 2, 2024 13:21:43 GMT -5
That’s the beautiful thing about this forum. Everybody is allowed an opinion. The six to eight training sessions these coaches spend with their 15-17 year-old athletes will not develop them into great players or a great team. However, coaches spending six to eight days with athletes can influence a college decision. I believe there are plenty of retired DI coaches, club coaches, and HS coaches who can take these rosters and meet preferred results. Again, just my opinion. Another beautiful thing about this forum is that your opinion is not sacred, and if you put it out there for everyone to read, you have to accept that people will disagree. You're wrong about the availability of top coaches just sitting idly on the sidelines. Retired coaches tend to retire because they don't want to coach anymore. If they were better than the coaches who've agreed to be on the team, they'd be on the team - presuming they take the offer. Many turn it down because, again, retirement. The coaches on the team now may not be the best coaches in the country, but they're the ones who said yes. Not everyone wants to coach these teams, for a plethora of reasons. Finally, LOL at the idea that preventing Jaylen from coaching these teams will in any way affect Nebraska's recruiting.
|
|
|
Post by gibbyb1 on May 2, 2024 14:00:23 GMT -5
That’s the beautiful thing about this forum. Everybody is allowed an opinion. The six to eight training sessions these coaches spend with their 15-17 year-old athletes will not develop them into great players or a great team. However, coaches spending six to eight days with athletes can influence a college decision. I believe there are plenty of retired DI coaches, club coaches, and HS coaches who can take these rosters and meet preferred results. Again, just my opinion. Another beautiful thing about this forum is that your opinion is not sacred, and if you put it out there for everyone to read, you have to accept that people will disagree. You're wrong about the availability of top coaches just sitting idly on the sidelines. Retired coaches tend to retire because they don't want to coach anymore. If they were better than the coaches who've agreed to be on the team, they'd be on the team - presuming they take the offer. Many turn it down because, again, retirement. The coaches on the team now may not be the best coaches in the country, but they're the ones who said yes. Not everyone wants to coach these teams, for a plethora of reasons. Finally, LOL at the idea that preventing Jaylen from coaching these teams will in any way affect Nebraska's recruiting. I think coaching these development team is in fact a recruiting advantage and therefore not being able to do so impacts recruiting. Developing relationships is a huge part of recruiting. I’d also submit that USA volleyball may see value in developing coaches at the international level, they certainly should.
|
|
|
Post by belgianhusker on May 2, 2024 15:50:20 GMT -5
Cozy with the Cornhuskers | Ep. 4 - Andi Jackson & Rebekah Allick
I see Queen Andi, I click!
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on May 2, 2024 16:13:53 GMT -5
Another beautiful thing about this forum is that your opinion is not sacred, and if you put it out there for everyone to read, you have to accept that people will disagree. You're wrong about the availability of top coaches just sitting idly on the sidelines. Retired coaches tend to retire because they don't want to coach anymore. If they were better than the coaches who've agreed to be on the team, they'd be on the team - presuming they take the offer. Many turn it down because, again, retirement. The coaches on the team now may not be the best coaches in the country, but they're the ones who said yes. Not everyone wants to coach these teams, for a plethora of reasons. Finally, LOL at the idea that preventing Jaylen from coaching these teams will in any way affect Nebraska's recruiting. I think coaching these development team is in fact a recruiting advantage and therefore not being able to do so impacts recruiting. Developing relationships is a huge part of recruiting. I’d also submit that USA volleyball may see value in developing coaches at the international level, they certainly should. Just who do you believe should coach these teams? I mean if you eliminate all college coaches, who is left? -old retired coaches who no longer want or are able to do it, -younger “coaches” who aren’t good enough to be hired by a college to coach, or -the few high school coaches who are technically qualified to coach these elite athletes? Athletes selected to these teams want and expect high level coaching and instruction-not old out of the sport ex-coaches, young unable to get a college job coaches or some random high school coach who is probably no better than their own high school coach. Again, why do any of these elite volleyball players deserve anything but the best coaches available as they represent their country? If the question is some conjured up recruiting advantage, then your school should hire better coaches-so they are selected to coach these teams. Oh, and just a comment on the effect of elite level coaching during a couple weeks of practices and a handful of matches. Seriously? That’s just too inane to even respond to. This experience will allow every player to jump levels in the quality of their play. That may be the most bizarre uninformed thing ever posted on VT. 🏐
|
|
|
Post by xlumie on May 2, 2024 16:26:24 GMT -5
Rubbish…. Those coaches are coaching in the colleges because they are the best coaches…do we not want our best coaches coaching our best young players? I do believe we have enough elite young coaches that no head coaches should be coaching these age group teams. Morrison and Olmstead should not be coaching these teams. It should be the best non-head college coaches and maybe assign retired coaches like Mick Haley, Geoff Carlston, Tom Hilbert ect… to be available for advice. That’s the beautiful thing about this forum. Everybody is allowed an opinion. The six to eight training sessions these coaches spend with their 15-17 year-old athletes will not develop them into great players or a great team. However, coaches spending six to eight days with athletes can influence a college decision. I believe there are plenty of retired DI coaches, club coaches, and HS coaches who can take these rosters and meet preferred results. Again, just my opinion. Why would anyone go out of retirement to coach for free?
|
|
|
Post by gohuskervolleyball on May 2, 2024 18:56:44 GMT -5
Cozy with the Cornhuskers | Ep. 4 - Andi Jackson & Rebekah Allick I see Queen Andi, I click! Andi’s skin is flawless
|
|
|
Post by gibbyb1 on May 2, 2024 22:28:22 GMT -5
I think coaching these development team is in fact a recruiting advantage and therefore not being able to do so impacts recruiting. Developing relationships is a huge part of recruiting. I’d also submit that USA volleyball may see value in developing coaches at the international level, they certainly should. Just who do you believe should coach these teams? I mean if you eliminate all college coaches, who is left? -old retired coaches who no longer want or are able to do it, -younger “coaches” who aren’t good enough to be hired by a college to coach, or -the few high school coaches who are technically qualified to coach these elite athletes? Athletes selected to these teams want and expect high level coaching and instruction-not old out of the sport ex-coaches, young unable to get a college job coaches or some random high school coach who is probably no better than their own high school coach. Again, why do any of these elite volleyball players deserve anything but the best coaches available as they represent their country? If the question is some conjured up recruiting advantage, then your school should hire better coaches-so they are selected to coach these teams. Oh, and just a comment on the effect of elite level coaching during a couple weeks of practices and a handful of matches. Seriously? That’s just too inane to even respond to. This experience will allow every player to jump levels in the quality of their play. That may be the most bizarre uninformed thing ever posted on VT. 🏐 I have no idea why you are sending this response to my post.
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on May 2, 2024 22:33:08 GMT -5
I think coaching these development team is in fact a recruiting advantage and therefore not being able to do so impacts recruiting. Developing relationships is a huge part of recruiting. I’d also submit that USA volleyball may see value in developing coaches at the international level, they certainly should. Just who do you believe should coach these teams? I mean if you eliminate all college coaches, who is left? -old retired coaches who no longer want or are able to do it, -younger “coaches” who aren’t good enough to be hired by a college to coach, or -the few high school coaches who are technically qualified to coach these elite athletes? Athletes selected to these teams want and expect high level coaching and instruction-not old out of the sport ex-coaches, young unable to get a college job coaches or some random high school coach who is probably no better than their own high school coach. Again, why do any of these elite volleyball players deserve anything but the best coaches available as they represent their country? If the question is some conjured up recruiting advantage, then your school should hire better coaches-so they are selected to coach these teams. Oh, and just a comment on the effect of elite level coaching during a couple weeks of practices and a handful of matches. Seriously? That’s just too inane to even respond to. This experience will allow every player to jump levels in the quality of their play. That may be the most bizarre uninformed thing ever posted on VT. 🏐 This is such a wildy uninformed opinion that it's actually kind of entertaining.
|
|
|
Post by vergyltantor on May 3, 2024 7:26:30 GMT -5
Jaylen Reyes is helping coach the U21 team. Players that are largley committed to a college or already attending. I don't see a lot of recruiting advantage there.
|
|
|
Post by belgianhusker on May 3, 2024 9:20:25 GMT -5
Coach Cook talks about the offseason and the spring match in Kearney
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on May 3, 2024 9:22:19 GMT -5
Jaylen Reyes is helping coach the U21 team. Players that are largley committed to a college or already attending. I don't see a lot of recruiting advantage there. until one of them enters the portal - Fischer coached Kelley at USA while she was in the portal last year. I don't think its necessarily a bad thing, but it is a thing
|
|
|
Post by belgianhusker on May 3, 2024 9:28:36 GMT -5
MORE ANDI!!!
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on May 3, 2024 9:46:30 GMT -5
Just who do you believe should coach these teams? I mean if you eliminate all college coaches, who is left? -old retired coaches who no longer want or are able to do it, -younger “coaches” who aren’t good enough to be hired by a college to coach, or -the few high school coaches who are technically qualified to coach these elite athletes? Athletes selected to these teams want and expect high level coaching and instruction-not old out of the sport ex-coaches, young unable to get a college job coaches or some random high school coach who is probably no better than their own high school coach. Again, why do any of these elite volleyball players deserve anything but the best coaches available as they represent their country? If the question is some conjured up recruiting advantage, then your school should hire better coaches-so they are selected to coach these teams. Oh, and just a comment on the effect of elite level coaching during a couple weeks of practices and a handful of matches. Seriously? That’s just too inane to even respond to. This experience will allow every player to jump levels in the quality of their play. That may be the most bizarre uninformed thing ever posted on VT. 🏐 This is such a wildy uninformed opinion that it's actually kind of entertaining. Cite a single “uniformed” opinion….
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on May 3, 2024 10:09:07 GMT -5
This is such a wildy uninformed opinion that it's actually kind of entertaining. Cite a single “uniformed” opinion…. photos1 Is this sufficient? I do believe so.
|
|