|
Post by midnightblue on Jul 9, 2024 19:15:53 GMT -5
the men's team is HOT. there, i said it. france, italy, and argentina are also giving me what i need as well Oh I’d definitely go to Paris with Matt, Max, the Micahs, TJ (pre tats), Champlin, Jaeschke, Gabi, Knigge, Gasman, Pasteur, etc.!! the tats give it flavor...
|
|
|
Post by nikkigsmith on Jul 9, 2024 19:25:21 GMT -5
Seems like LC was always the number 1 pick and the choice was between Poulter and Hancock this VNL. Poulter came back and was not ready.. anyone that’s not bias could see this. I truly feel for Hancock who had her best tournament for USA ever, last VNL. You are next level delusional and I love you for that lmao <3 You know I rock hard for Carlini but I didn’t take that comment as Carlini is the #1 setter. I took it as he had planned on having Carlini on the roster.
|
|
|
Post by avid 2.0 on Jul 9, 2024 20:29:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jul 9, 2024 20:55:17 GMT -5
Frantti would like a word I wouldnt consider Frantti a veteran. She's a veteran of PTSD
|
|
|
Post by liberovb10 on Jul 9, 2024 21:16:42 GMT -5
i don’t know what to think about her comment of not playing together for a year so the roster was picked off best fit and overall vibe. i know she didn’t mean it in a bad way - but without context people can assume it as a dig that talent had nothing to do with it
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jul 9, 2024 22:05:55 GMT -5
i don’t know what to think about her comment of not playing together for a year so the roster was picked off best fit and overall vibe. i know she didn’t mean it in a bad way - but without context people can assume it as a dig that talent had nothing to do with it It seems to be an accurate assessment that some/many people here have sensed to be the case. Being genuinely truthful isn’t necessarily shady. Perhaps, ironically, keeping Hancock off the main Olympic roster (at least initially) even though Karch knew that Poulter might not be ready may end up being the ultimate confirmation of what Carlini described—Hancock may end up being the one who really was most capable of dealing with the inherent inequity/unfairness of what Karch has been doing this entire quad.
|
|
|
Post by leftcoaster71 on Jul 9, 2024 22:08:23 GMT -5
that moment when JWO’s height doesnt even reach matt’s armpit i wouldn't mind reaching for matt's armpit! I swear, when Vegas eventually hosts the Final 4, I'm hiring all the hottest Go-Go boys and turning my house into a gay bar. I'll make a million bucks that week.
|
|
|
Post by c4ndlelight on Jul 9, 2024 22:13:50 GMT -5
i don’t know what to think about her comment of not playing together for a year so the roster was picked off best fit and overall vibe. i know she didn’t mean it in a bad way - but without context people can assume it as a dig that talent had nothing to do with it It's giving https://www.tiktok.com/@igreenscreenthings/video/7256993862097308971
|
|
|
Post by yupyupyup on Jul 10, 2024 0:12:16 GMT -5
i don’t know what to think about her comment of not playing together for a year so the roster was picked off best fit and overall vibe. i know she didn’t mean it in a bad way - but without context people can assume it as a dig that talent had nothing to do with it It seems to be an accurate assessment that some/many people here have sensed to be the case. Being genuinely truthful isn’t necessarily shady. Perhaps, ironically, keeping Hancock off the main Olympic roster (at least initially) even though Karch knew that Poulter might not be ready may end up being the ultimate confirmation of what Carlini described—Hancock may end up being the one who really was most capable of dealing with the inherent inequity/unfairness of what Karch has been doing this entire quad. What do you mean Hancock may end up being the one who was most capable of dealing with inequity/unfairness? If anyone dealt with it in the most ‘capable’ way, it is Carlini who didn’t wine/complain/quit the national team after years put in and not make Tokyo roster, and worked to make the Paris roster. Hancock may end up replacing Poulter after all anyway.
|
|
|
Post by xlumie on Jul 10, 2024 0:22:56 GMT -5
the men's team is HOT. there, i said it. france, italy, and argentina are also giving me what i need as well Oh I’d definitely go to Paris with Matt, Max, the Micahs, TJ (pre tats), Champlin, Jaeschke, Gabi, Knigge, Gasman, Pasteur, etc.!! All I got from this was that you aren't attracted to bottoms.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2024 0:41:12 GMT -5
Can we please have Santarelli... Gio will never come back to the USA until he finally loses all respect (and earning potential). Santarelli might be interested in a USA gig someday, but mainly because he's is the new kid on the block rn, and he gets to speak last--if at all--among his current Italian peer group. Rebuke!! Gio is here, watching!
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jul 10, 2024 1:09:14 GMT -5
It seems to be an accurate assessment that some/many people here have sensed to be the case. Being genuinely truthful isn’t necessarily shady. Perhaps, ironically, keeping Hancock off the main Olympic roster (at least initially) even though Karch knew that Poulter might not be ready may end up being the ultimate confirmation of what Carlini described—Hancock may end up being the one who really was most capable of dealing with the inherent inequity/unfairness of what Karch has been doing this entire quad. What do you mean Hancock may end up being the one who was most capable of dealing with inequity/unfairness? If anyone dealt with it in the most ‘capable’ way, it is Carlini who didn’t wine/complain/quit the national team after years put in and not make Tokyo roster, and worked to make the Paris roster. Hancock may end up replacing Poulter after all anyway. Putting so much faith in Poulter is/was a bad mistake by Karch imo, but I have no doubt that Karch believed that Hancock would handle being an alternate (and likely moving onto the roster) better than Carlini would have handled being named an alternate.
|
|
|
Post by babyhusker on Jul 10, 2024 1:16:39 GMT -5
What do you mean Hancock may end up being the one who was most capable of dealing with inequity/unfairness? If anyone dealt with it in the most ‘capable’ way, it is Carlini who didn’t wine/complain/quit the national team after years put in and not make Tokyo roster, and worked to make the Paris roster. Hancock may end up replacing Poulter after all anyway. Putting so much faith in Poulter is/was a bad mistake by Karch imo, but I have no doubt that Karch believed that Hancock would handle being an alternate (and likely moving onto the roster) better than Carlini would have handled being named an alternate. If that was his thinking, he would have chosen Hancock over Poulter to begin with. I highly doubt he had enough foresight to think that way.
|
|
|
Post by volleyguy on Jul 10, 2024 2:11:42 GMT -5
Putting so much faith in Poulter is/was a bad mistake by Karch imo, but I have no doubt that Karch believed that Hancock would handle being an alternate (and likely moving onto the roster) better than Carlini would have handled being named an alternate. If that was his thinking, he would have chosen Hancock over Poulter to begin with. I highly doubt he had enough foresight to think that way. His first choice is/was obviously Poulter.
|
|
|
Post by acea on Jul 10, 2024 3:24:44 GMT -5
Oh Mama we are being fed… and if you see what I see there’s plenty to go around! (I know this is the women’s thread but y’all are not on the men’s forum enough 🥸) www.tiktok.com/t/ZPREt4LKV/
|
|