|
Post by babyhusker on Apr 28, 2024 21:39:57 GMT -5
And the winner is, Bergen That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. The irony that your user is statsqueen while saying Harper’s serve receive is sus…she absolutely broke down at the end of the season (as they all did) but she passed over a 2.2 on the year. And many of her highlights came in critical moments in fifth sets. Error prone yes, but most CERTAINLY clutch
|
|
|
Post by plm on Apr 28, 2024 22:18:48 GMT -5
And the winner is, Bergen That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. You had better checks the stats before posting what you did. Harper only had three matches that she hit less than .100. Her hitting % for the year was .237. That's pretty high for all the matches you think she hit for less than .100.
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on Apr 28, 2024 22:32:24 GMT -5
And the winner is, Bergen That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. That all sounds good and you can keep that bouncing around the “justice” synapses in your brain, but the coaches and volleyball media of the B1G already answered the question last December, and they don’t agree. As for next fall, that is an unknown, but history would again disagree with you. Players like Larson, Thompson, Kipp, Eggleston, Plumber and others in the past were elite as freshman so the tape on them was out and the “scouts” all put their keen and penetrating minds to to stopping them, and that never really works for the truly elite players, because they all work, train and evolve as volleyball players sufficiently to stay ahead of the “scouts”. If “scouting” was going to put the clamps on Murray, it would have already-she’s been elite in her age group since she was an eighth grader. From all accounts she is an extremely hardworking player, so we’ll see how it goes. And lastly, Murray was held below .100 only twice last fall, but those two coaches and their “scouts” must have figured it out. I guess the calls to Piscataway and Atlanta must be burning up the cell lines at Rutgers and Georgia Tech. I seem to remember Marist holding a freshman named Eggleston below .100… didn’t seem to help the “scouts” too much. Sorry 🏐
|
|
|
Post by hookem1 on Apr 28, 2024 22:41:29 GMT -5
Obvious bait lmao
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2024 22:56:38 GMT -5
And the winner is, Bergen That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. also let’s not forget who was aced on NC match point
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2024 22:58:19 GMT -5
I guess I should be happy that this thread dethroned the narcissistic “we’ve won two national championships in a row “thread. aw is someone upset their corn on the cob isn’t in the club?
|
|
|
Post by photos1 on Apr 28, 2024 23:08:08 GMT -5
That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. also let’s not forget who was aced on NC match point Let’s all remember the 332 teams who had players who couldn’t have been aced on match point of the national championship match, because they weren’t there. But nice point… amusing 🏐
|
|
|
Post by HOLIDAY on Apr 29, 2024 0:41:49 GMT -5
I guess I should be happy that this thread dethroned the narcissistic “we’ve won two national championships in a row “thread. aw is someone upset their corn on the cob isn’t in the club? I’m just fascinated that any ego in the world would need that much stroking that you actually start a thread about yourselves and then never stop talking about it.? What kind of self centeredness is that?
|
|
|
Post by biodogtexas on Apr 29, 2024 1:42:41 GMT -5
aw is someone upset their corn on the cob isn’t in the club? I’m just fascinated that any ego in the world would need that much stroking that you actually start a thread about yourselves and then never stop talking about it.? What kind of self centeredness is that? This seems a very dumb take. Nebraska doesn't have their own team thread? Texas isn't allowed to have it's own thread like everyone else?
|
|
|
Post by biodogtexas on Apr 29, 2024 1:53:40 GMT -5
I see a lot of “cook won’t do anything”… yet isn’t that the absolute precedent lol? Texas’s Micaya White was pulled over by the police while driving, failed a sobriety test, smelled heavily of alcohol, and admitted to underage drinking and driving and yet, she played with the collegiate national team in the spring and didn’t miss a single match the following year with Texas... It’s literally how every coach has operated in the past. Beyond that I advocated for her forgiveness. She was a phenomenal player. She’s not defined by one dumb mistake. She grew from it. There's a difference between a dui, and a dui while also obstructing and having a fake id. People legitimately go to jail all the time for what she did. The obstructing charge isn't even eligible for pre-trial diversion like the others.
|
|
|
Post by stevehorn on Apr 29, 2024 8:32:35 GMT -5
I guess I should be happy that this thread dethroned the narcissistic “we’ve won two national championships in a row “thread. I'm glad our thread title and team accomplishment bothers you more than a Nebraska player breaking the law.
|
|
|
Post by statsqueen on Apr 29, 2024 9:42:24 GMT -5
That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... The fact that so many teams held her below .100 attack percentage indicates that there's something they are seeing that stops her effectively, which means next year will be even tougher for her if scouts for opponent teams are effective. And, it will all be blamed on this ordeal. You had better checks the stats before posting what you did. Harper only had three matches that she hit less than .100. Her hitting % for the year was .237. That's pretty high for all the matches you think she hit for less than .100. The fact that ALL of those matches came at the end of the year indicates someone (or multiple someones) found a pattern and capitalized. Sometimes that takes awhile, but once it happens it's bad news for the player and her future performance....
|
|
|
Post by eyeroll2021 on Apr 29, 2024 9:50:01 GMT -5
I’m just fascinated that any ego in the world would need that much stroking that you actually start a thread about yourselves and then never stop talking about it.? What kind of self centeredness is that? This seems a very dumb take. Nebraska doesn't have their own team thread? Texas isn't allowed to have it's own thread like everyone else? Idiotic. There are currently no less than 4 Husker-related threads on the front page
|
|
|
Post by stanfordvb on Apr 29, 2024 11:05:41 GMT -5
And the winner is, Bergen That was always the right answer anyway, and it's sad if anyone doubts that she earned it fair and square. Harper is athletic, but not clutch and definitely error prone. Serve receive is sus, and NOT up to 6-ro par.... Okay 'stats queen', put that username to good use and name me 5 outsides from ranked teams last year that had better passing stats than Murray lol. You responded to other parts but I want you to respond directly to what you said about her passing, because that is truly one of the worst takes I've ever seen on this site for the 5 or so years that I've been on here. Be honest... did you take any time to actually look at her passing stats before calling her a 'sus' passer?
|
|
|
Post by badgercard on Apr 29, 2024 13:25:52 GMT -5
aw is someone upset their corn on the cob isn’t in the club? I’m just fascinated that any ego in the world would need that much stroking that you actually start a thread about yourselves and then never stop talking about it.? What kind of self centeredness is that? holiday you start at least 3 pointless, misleading threads an hour in off the net lmao.
|
|