|
Post by nikkigsmith on Jun 12, 2024 23:41:10 GMT -5
Maybe she’ll give up her spot before then. hancock made right decision to gave up her spot, so carlini can have her spotlight and made her dream come true. Italy and japan, we'll see. Delusional?
|
|
|
Post by sleepy on Jun 12, 2024 23:41:21 GMT -5
Was Miss Drew’s being cryptic in that interview? Things happening off the court took a backseat today?? What’s the drama Annie?! she said “things happening outside of our side of the court”. i dont think there is any drama lol she is probably just referencing how they felt they were focused on what was happening on their opponents side previously
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:04 GMT -5
Plummer: 35-19-102 (.157) Larson: 89-14-203 (.369) so at this point: Offense: Larson Defense: Larson Passing: Larson Serving: Larson Blocking: Plummer at what point is the experiment over and she returns to being a front row super sub every once in a while?🫣 I hate to agree with this but I do. KP just needs something that none of our setters can provide it seems. I would start Larson vs. Italy and Japan and bring in KP only if the left side offense isn't clicking.
|
|
|
Post by Norah Sus on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:15 GMT -5
Annie's voice always surprises me Was just typing “that’s not Annie’s voice” when I read your post
|
|
|
Post by Reach on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:28 GMT -5
I think I asked this in another thread, but did Karch not play Carlini earlier because he already knew he picked her and was trying to decide between Poulter and Hancock??? no, carlini had a poor performance in week1. That is why alot are questioning her spot. 🧌
|
|
|
Post by jwvolley on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:36 GMT -5
Canada about to get swept tomorrow by Japan after all this anticipation lmao But that's OK. They are now back in control. Even if they get swept against Japan, they will overtake Netherlands with a 3-0 H2H win. A 3-1 win would put them close enough to where a win over France is worth more than Korea, and that could put them over. Canada was definitely OK with doing whatever the Dutch did today. The only thing Canada beating Japan does now is that would mean they could win 3-2 over Netherlands instead of only 3-1/3-0. I don't like going into matches needing to win a certain amount of sets. A H2H should just be who can win the match (obviously I get its their own fault to be in this position lol). Would taking Japan 5 sets win or lose help their cause at all?
|
|
|
Post by Wichsen on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:58 GMT -5
Plummer: 35-19-102 (.157) Larson: 89-14-203 (.369) so at this point: Offense: Larson Defense: Larson Passing: Larson Serving: Larson Blocking: Plummer at what point is the experiment over and she returns to being a front row super sub every once in a while?🫣 poor plummer, still can't translate her club season performance until now? Maybe it will showup comes olympic? 🤔
|
|
|
Post by badgerbreath on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:59 GMT -5
This Carlini is the one I know and love. Long may it last.
|
|
|
Post by GatorsChomp on Jun 12, 2024 23:42:59 GMT -5
Canada about to get swept tomorrow by Japan after all this anticipation lmao But that's OK. They are now back in control. Even if they get swept against Japan, they will overtake Netherlands with a 3-0 H2H win. A 3-1 win would put them close enough to where a win over France is worth more than Korea, and that could put them over. Canada was definitely OK with doing whatever the Dutch did today. The only thing Canada beating Japan does now is that would mean they could win 3-2 over Netherlands instead of only 3-1/3-0. atp Canada just needs one set win against Japan to be able to beat the Dutch 3-1/3-2 and still make it no?
|
|
|
Post by maigrey on Jun 12, 2024 23:43:08 GMT -5
Plummer: 35-19-102 (.157) Larson: 89-14-203 (.369) so at this point: Offense: Larson Defense: Larson Passing: Larson Serving: Larson Blocking: Plummer at what point is the experiment over and she returns to being a front row super sub every once in a while?🫣 Us old folks need to rest more often. I bet she is back starting for Italy, etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2024 23:44:22 GMT -5
I just love that our middles both combined for OVER 20 points for the first time since when? Before Tokyo?
|
|
|
Post by uofaGRAD on Jun 12, 2024 23:45:20 GMT -5
Plummer: 35-19-102 (.157) Larson: 89-14-203 (.369) so at this point: Offense: Larson Defense: Larson Passing: Larson Serving: Larson Blocking: Plummer at what point is the experiment over and she returns to being a front row super sub every once in a while?🫣 Us old folks need to rest more often. I bet she is back starting for Italy, etc. LOL I get it. I just think the Plummer agenda has run its course for this quad. 2028 maybe? we aren’t Imoco
|
|
|
Post by Hawk Attack on Jun 12, 2024 23:46:13 GMT -5
I just love that our middles both combined for OVER 20 points for the first time since when? Before Tokyo? You already forgot THAILAND?
|
|
|
Post by Wichsen on Jun 12, 2024 23:46:15 GMT -5
Plummer: 35-19-102 (.157) Larson: 89-14-203 (.369) so at this point: Offense: Larson Defense: Larson Passing: Larson Serving: Larson Blocking: Plummer at what point is the experiment over and she returns to being a front row super sub every once in a while?🫣 I hate to agree with this but I do. KP just needs something that none of our setters can provide it seems. I would start Larson vs. Italy and Japan and bring in KP only if the left side offense isn't clicking. so why would you bring plummer if none of these setters can work her buttoff? 🤔
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 12, 2024 23:46:16 GMT -5
Us old folks need to rest more often. I bet she is back starting for Italy, etc. LOL I get it. I just think the Plummer agenda has run its course for this quad. 2028 maybe? we aren’t Imoco I agree. I hope Karch and Co. continue to invest in her but just do not think she fits this system. She seems afraid to swing. That is a problem.
|
|