|
Texas 2014
Apr 21, 2014 15:16:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 15:16:59 GMT -5
The fact that you relate my online personality to a teenage girl movie makes me envision you have a vagina. The fact you picked apart my example of Chloe's leadership for no-good reason makes me want to kick you in it. She doesn't even go here
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 15:29:17 GMT -5
I think we all can agree both chloe and dalton are great setters and both have starting potential. Whatever Jerrit and co decide, we will see if it works out. Texas has all the weapons for a national championship. All the weapons in all the wrong positions.
|
|
|
Texas 2014
Apr 21, 2014 15:36:29 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 15:36:29 GMT -5
I think we all can agree both chloe and dalton are great setters and both have starting potential. Whatever Jerrit and co decide, we will see if it works out. Texas has all the weapons for a national championship. All the weapons in all the wrong positions. Besides dalton. Who else do you feel is in the wrong position. I'm genuinely curious to see who you think should play where and why.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 15:37:10 GMT -5
All the weapons in all the wrong positions. Besides dalton. Who else do you feel is in the wrong position. I'm genuinely curious to see who you think should play where and why. I already posted the answer to this.
|
|
|
Post by TexVB on Apr 21, 2014 19:12:37 GMT -5
I saw the Houston games and the match at Gregory gym VS NMSU. Dalton is very vocal with her team, (she seems to be talking to them more before the plays), but she seems somewhat limited with her jumping; perhaps she is still taking it easy due to past surgeries. Chloe runs and jumps all over the court to put up good sets, but is not as vocal. Both set well, in my opinion, and I think coach is trying to see who connects best with which hitter. Texas has a lot of great talent all around & I can't wait until Fall volleyball! I'm not sure where you were seated during the Houston matches. I was sitting right on the sideline and to say Chloe was not vocal and Dalton is very vocal is almost the complete opposite of what I saw. During the UTSA set , for example, when Texas was down 10-17 it was Collins getting on everyone saying "stop making stupid mistakes and let's go". That kind of vocalness is typically what I relate to leadership on the court. I admit I can't hear what's going on in their huddles nor do I pay any attention to that. But I really don't agree with the assessment Chloe is not vocal and Dalton is very vocal. I just said that Chloe is not AS vocal. I especially noticed it at the spring match in Austin vs NMSU. Somewhat different styles of being "vocal" that day in particular. Who knows, maybe it was just that set/match, that day, and that group of hitters. Both are very good setters. Texas is looking very good this year. Very excited for this team!
|
|
|
Post by elevationvb on Apr 21, 2014 20:14:36 GMT -5
You have no one to pass the ball. You can't afford Dalton not passing. And, Collins' block wasn't exploited during the Wisconsin match (she only played half of one set) - Eckerman's and Webster's was. The Badgers ran the slide for kills all night long. That and a 5'7" hitter tooling Chiaka on the RS all night. Collins was quickly benched after subbing for Allison in game 2 because she was being exploited because of her lack of size playing the front row.
|
|
|
Post by elevationvb on Apr 21, 2014 20:20:11 GMT -5
I saw the Houston games and the match at Gregory gym VS NMSU. Dalton is very vocal with her team, (she seems to be talking to them more before the plays), but she seems somewhat limited with her jumping; perhaps she is still taking it easy due to past surgeries. Chloe runs and jumps all over the court to put up good sets, but is not as vocal. Both set well, in my opinion, and I think coach is trying to see who connects best with which hitter. Texas has a lot of great talent all around & I can't wait until Fall volleyball! I'm not sure where you were seated during the Houston matches. I was sitting right on the sideline and to say Chloe was not vocal and Dalton is very vocal is almost the complete opposite of what I saw. During the UTSA set , for example, when Texas was down 10-17 it was Collins getting on everyone saying "stop making stupid mistakes and let's go". That kind of vocalness is typically what I relate to leadership on the court. I admit I can't hear what's going on in their huddles nor do I pay any attention to that. But I really don't agree with the assessment Chloe is not vocal and Dalton is very vocal.
I don't think Dalton or Collins are very vocal on the court. Don't see a problem with Collins telling players to stop making "stupid mistakes." If her teammates see that she's working hard and leading by example, they shouldn't take offense by these type of comments. At least Collins and Dalton are not as bad as Kocher when it comes to court presence for a setter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 20:22:04 GMT -5
That and a 5'7" hitter tooling Chiaka on the RS all night. Collins was quickly benched after subbing for Allison in game 2 because she was being exploited because of her lack of size playing the front row.
And you know that how...? You still fail to realize that Texas' left side block was the real target all night. Texas' block in that match was very poor in general. Not just Collins' for ten points.
|
|
|
Post by elevationvb on Apr 21, 2014 20:23:02 GMT -5
I think we all can agree both chloe and dalton are great setters and both have starting potential. Whatever Jerrit and co decide, we will see if it works out. Texas has all the weapons for a national championship. They are not "great" setters. But we don't need a great setter to compete for a national championship.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 20:23:09 GMT -5
I'm not sure where you were seated during the Houston matches. I was sitting right on the sideline and to say Chloe was not vocal and Dalton is very vocal is almost the complete opposite of what I saw. During the UTSA set , for example, when Texas was down 10-17 it was Collins getting on everyone saying "stop making stupid mistakes and let's go". That kind of vocalness is typically what I relate to leadership on the court. I admit I can't hear what's going on in their huddles nor do I pay any attention to that. But I really don't agree with the assessment Chloe is not vocal and Dalton is very vocal.
I don't think Dalton or Collins are very vocal on the court. Don't see a problem with Collins telling players to stop making "stupid mistakes." If her teammates see that she's working hard and leading by example, they shouldn't take offense by these type of comments. At least Collins and Dalton are not as bad as Kocher when it comes to court presence for a setter. Don't.
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 20:30:03 GMT -5
I think we all can agree both chloe and dalton are great setters and both have starting potential. Whatever Jerrit and co decide, we will see if it works out. Texas has all the weapons for a national championship. They are not "great" setters. But we don't need a great setter to compete for a national championship.Maybe great was the wrong word, but regardless, both collins are dalton are very capable setters and both have starting potential. Jerrit and staff will know whos the better one by the time season starts. I wish the two of them the best of luck.
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 20:52:11 GMT -5
Lol amusing, yet highly accurate response! Within your hyperbolic attacks lies much truth, truth I never tried to conceal. Let my response signal I'm on board with your idea; respond only if you need to. I'm very happy with Bugg at Stanford so no, that's not the reason. Well, if Jerritt does what I think he's going to do, he'll run a 6-2. Dalton is a better setter than hitter IMO and with Bell, Eckerman, Webster, and Bannister there she will probably not be needed to hit. Collins is the best setter in her class (IMO, I guess) and is more than good enough to run the offense by herself. If Jerritt is smart, he will eventually realize that 6-2's don't work. If this epiphany occurs during the time that both of these girls are at Texas, he'll realize that he must choose one or the other (and I give him credit, I think this will happen soon). Considering their talents, I don't think either of them will want to sit the bench regardless of where they go to school. And in reference to Murphy, what I meant to say is that it is frustrating to see her running a 6-2 when she would be more effective as a 6-rotation opposite. Happy now, TexVB? You said this in a texas thread. So tell me again how dalton is not a setter? (I dont know how to quote from other threads so I just copied and pasted it
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 21:05:11 GMT -5
Exactly who will be sad? Perhaps you are sad because neither chose to attend your team/school of choice? If Murphy was sad & thought her talents were being wasted don't you think she would have transferred by now? Hmmmmmmm let's see..... - They are attending a university with a an excellent academic reputation, a very supportive athletic program with large budget & an excellent fan base. - They will play on a top tier division one level team, joining other top level recruits and compete for NCs. - They will train under Salima Rockwell a decorated athlete herself and one of the most sought after coaches in the country. - They will be spending their off time in a hip, vibrant, progressive & cosmopolitan city of Austin. Yes very sad! As far as playing time, I'm not be concerned for either Dalton or Collins. Besides that's over 2 years away. This thread is about the 2011-12 roster. I'm very happy with Bugg at Stanford so no, that's not the reason. Well, if Jerritt does what I think he's going to do, he'll run a 6-2. Dalton is a better setter than hitter IMO and with Bell, Eckerman, Webster, and Bannister there she will probably not be needed to hit. Collins is the best setter in her class (IMO, I guess) and is more than good enough to run the offense by herself. If Jerritt is smart, he will eventually realize that 6-2's don't work. If this epiphany occurs during the time that both of these girls are at Texas, he'll realize that he must choose one or the other (and I give him credit, I think this will happen soon). Considering their talents, I don't think either of them will want to sit the bench regardless of where they go to school. And in reference to Murphy, what I meant to say is that it is frustrating to see her running a 6-2 when she would be more effective as a 6-rotation opposite. Happy now, TexVB? And I quote. But of course. even though you said dalton is a better setter than OH and even said she would be the number one recruit of her class (I can quote that as well), Dalton isnt a setter. She is most definitely an OH
|
|
|
Post by WahineFan44 on Apr 21, 2014 21:14:44 GMT -5
If only you knew how to use the quote function... Just found out how to quote from a different thread. Quoted it for proof. So While you may never have thought dalton was a setter, Chis did and Im pretty sure the only reason he said dalton was not a setter, Is because I claimed she was and he just wanted to start an argument. Sadly that backfired because 1. Every single texas fan has stated dalton is a setter 2. He himself stated she was a better setter than OH
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 22:17:26 GMT -5
If only you knew how to use the quote function... Sadly that backfired because 1. Every single texas fan has stated dalton is a setter I'm beginning to think that you don't realize that this means nothing...
|
|