|
Post by mnsports255 on Dec 14, 2015 17:45:15 GMT -5
Thanks for the answers folks! For all you Husker fans in attendance, I expect you to cheer loud for Minnesota and louder for your Huskers. Would be great for the conference to have an all B1G final! Show the country who's boss.
|
|
|
Post by NebraskaVBfan93 on Dec 14, 2015 17:55:13 GMT -5
Thanks for the answers folks! For all you Husker fans in attendance, I expect you to cheer loud for Minnesota and louder for your Huskers. Would be great for the conference to have an all B1G final! Show the country who's boss. You can bet the Gophers will feel like they're playing at home on Thu.
|
|
|
Post by sunsuphornsup on Dec 14, 2015 17:55:27 GMT -5
Thanks for the answers folks! For all you Husker fans in attendance, I expect you to cheer loud for Minnesota and louder for your Huskers. Would be great for the conference to have an all B1G final! Show the country who's boss. Sorry to spoil this parade
|
|
|
Post by vup on Dec 14, 2015 18:52:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by bball on Dec 14, 2015 19:15:09 GMT -5
I'll be rooting for a nebraska vs minnesota final. B1G.
I was at the minnesota nebraska match a few months ago. Would love a rematch. Love what Hugh has done with this team.
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule95 on Dec 14, 2015 19:21:27 GMT -5
GO BIG RED!!
|
|
|
Post by MTC on Dec 14, 2015 20:31:05 GMT -5
I'll be rooting for a nebraska vs minnesota final. B1G. I was at the minnesota nebraska match a few months ago. Would love a rematch. Love what Hugh has done with this team. It is amazing what Nebraska has accomplished this year after many of the weaker players and recruits cleared out after last season. It should be a Big Ten Final.
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule95 on Dec 14, 2015 22:15:11 GMT -5
I'll be rooting for a nebraska vs minnesota final. B1G. I was at the minnesota nebraska match a few months ago. Would love a rematch. Love what Hugh has done with this team. It is amazing what Nebraska has accomplished this year after many of the weaker players and recruits cleared out after last season. It should be a Big Ten Final. Yea it is. Crazy thing is Nebraska could be even better next year. Lose 4 players but 2 rarely play and with Holman and recruits coming in
|
|
|
Post by gob1gred on Dec 14, 2015 22:21:33 GMT -5
It is amazing what Nebraska has accomplished this year after many of the weaker players and recruits cleared out after last season. It should be a Big Ten Final. Yea it is. Crazy thing is Nebraska could be even better next year. Lose 4 players but 2 rarely play and with Holman and recruits coming in I know I legitimately think next year's team might be better. Amber Rolfzen: BACK Kadie Rolfzen: BACK Kelly Hunter: BACK Justine Wong-Orantes: BACK Kenzie Maloney: BACK Mikaela Foecke: BACK Really only lose Cecilia Hall from the starting lineup but you could easily say Briana Holman is an "upgrade" considering she was a 1st team All American a year ago. Also bringing in Top 10 recruit MB Lauren Stivrins. Team will be stacked once again. 2017 though.....yikes
|
|
|
Post by brickred on Dec 14, 2015 22:25:10 GMT -5
Yea it is. Crazy thing is Nebraska could be even better next year. Lose 4 players but 2 rarely play and with Holman and recruits coming in I know I legitimately think next year's team might be better. Amber Rolfzen: BACK Kadie Rolfzen: BACK Kelly Hunter: BACK Justine Wong-Orantes: BACK Kenzie Maloney: BACK Mikaela Foecke: BACK Really only lose Cecilia Hall from the starting lineup but you could easily say Briana Holman is an "upgrade" considering she was a 1st team All American a year ago. Also bringing in Top 10 recruit MB Lauren Stivrins. Team will be stacked once again. 2017 though.....yikes 1. Fien is a substantial loss next year 2. Can we pump the brakes on all of this 2016 talk until Sunday?? At the very least, late Saturday night? 2a. This is the Nebraska 2015 thread
|
|
|
Post by huskerjen on Dec 14, 2015 23:34:34 GMT -5
Yea it is. Crazy thing is Nebraska could be even better next year. Lose 4 players but 2 rarely play and with Holman and recruits coming in I know I legitimately think next year's team might be better. Amber Rolfzen: BACK Kadie Rolfzen: BACK Kelly Hunter: BACK Justine Wong-Orantes: BACK Kenzie Maloney: BACK Mikaela Foecke: BACK Really only lose Cecilia Hall from the starting lineup but you could easily say Briana Holman is an "upgrade" considering she was a 1st team All American a year ago. Also bringing in Top 10 recruit MB Lauren Stivrins. Team will be stacked once again. 2017 though.....yikes What is "yikes" about 2017? Foecke, Holman, Hunter, Maloney, Stivrins, Albrecht, and bringing in two top-10 recruits in McClellan and Sweet is anything but "yikes." They still have 1 or 2 scholies for that incoming '17 class too. Just because they lose the twins and JWO doesn't mean that roster won't still be extremely talented.
|
|
|
Post by MTC on Dec 14, 2015 23:39:07 GMT -5
It is amazing what Nebraska has accomplished this year after many of the weaker players and recruits cleared out after last season. It should be a Big Ten Final. Yea it is. Crazy thing is Nebraska could be even better next year. Lose 4 players but 2 rarely play and with Holman and recruits coming in I believe you, of course Minnesota and Wisconsin looking forward to next year also.
|
|
|
Post by gob1gred on Dec 14, 2015 23:44:12 GMT -5
I know I legitimately think next year's team might be better. Amber Rolfzen: BACK Kadie Rolfzen: BACK Kelly Hunter: BACK Justine Wong-Orantes: BACK Kenzie Maloney: BACK Mikaela Foecke: BACK Really only lose Cecilia Hall from the starting lineup but you could easily say Briana Holman is an "upgrade" considering she was a 1st team All American a year ago. Also bringing in Top 10 recruit MB Lauren Stivrins. Team will be stacked once again. 2017 though.....yikes What is "yikes" about 2017? Foecke, Holman, Hunter, Maloney, Stivrins, Albrecht, and bringing in two top-10 recruits in McClellan and Sweet is anything but "yikes." They still have 1 or 2 scholies for that incoming '17 class too. Just because they lose the twins and JWO doesn't mean that roster won't still be extremely talented. Never said it wouldn't be talented. But, you have to expect some sort of drop off when you lose three 4-year starters. You can't just replace the Rolfzens twins OR Wong-Orantes for that matter. All three are some of the all-time greats. Nebraska always has a talented roster. But losing that graduating class will be rough you can't deny that.
|
|
|
Post by sunsuphornsup on Dec 14, 2015 23:53:30 GMT -5
What is "yikes" about 2017? Foecke, Holman, Hunter, Maloney, Stivrins, Albrecht, and bringing in two top-10 recruits in McClellan and Sweet is anything but "yikes." They still have 1 or 2 scholies for that incoming '17 class too. Just because they lose the twins and JWO doesn't mean that roster won't still be extremely talented. Never said it wouldn't be talented. But, you have to expect some sort of drop off when you lose three 4-year starters. You can't just replace the Rolfzens twins OR Wong-Orantes for that matter. All three are some of the all-time greats. Nebraska always has a talented roster. But losing that graduating class will be rough you can't deny that. JWO will be very tough to replace. She has so many intangible qualities that she brings on the court.
|
|
|
Post by huskersrule95 on Dec 15, 2015 0:18:35 GMT -5
What is "yikes" about 2017? Foecke, Holman, Hunter, Maloney, Stivrins, Albrecht, and bringing in two top-10 recruits in McClellan and Sweet is anything but "yikes." They still have 1 or 2 scholies for that incoming '17 class too. Just because they lose the twins and JWO doesn't mean that roster won't still be extremely talented. Never said it wouldn't be talented. But, you have to expect some sort of drop off when you lose three 4-year starters. You can't just replace the Rolfzens twins OR Wong-Orantes for that matter. All three are some of the all-time greats. Nebraska always has a talented roster. But losing that graduating class will be rough you can't deny that. I agree with you. No matter how good other players are, the experience will be tough to replace and will be some drop off.
|
|