|
Post by huskervball24 on Oct 21, 2019 14:34:48 GMT -5
Hitting %'s YTD:
Stivrins: .400 Sun: .295 Sweet: .257 Schwar: .247 Kubik: .202
|
|
|
Post by des on Oct 21, 2019 14:35:50 GMT -5
Madi - Big Ten freshman AND player of the week. Congrats! Cool! Happy for Madi! Hopefully that inspires her to continue her stellar form.
|
|
|
Post by huskervball24 on Oct 21, 2019 14:36:39 GMT -5
Since Stanford, the last 9 games, Kubik's season hitting % has been climbing:
0.158 0.167 0.168 0.177 0.189 0.178 0.178 0.195 0.202
Hope that trend can continue!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2019 14:42:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nothingbutcorn on Oct 21, 2019 15:02:07 GMT -5
Congrats Madi!
|
|
|
Post by huskerrob on Oct 21, 2019 17:37:12 GMT -5
I think you will see Haley inserted if Lexi or Madi are having a rough time in the back court. The problem with inserting Haley is that you lose the threat of a back-row attack on certain rotations, and I think right now the Huskers need all the offensive threats they can muster. Once Nicklin is able to get the Middles established consistently, I think we'll see more of Haley. this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall.
|
|
|
Post by andrewwmic on Oct 21, 2019 19:32:10 GMT -5
I think you will see Haley inserted if Lexi or Madi are having a rough time in the back court. The problem with inserting Haley is that you lose the threat of a back-row attack on certain rotations, and I think right now the Huskers need all the offensive threats they can muster. Once Nicklin is able to get the Middles established consistently, I think we'll see more of Haley. this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. lol at your random numbers that you just make up
|
|
|
Post by huskervolleyball on Oct 21, 2019 19:35:49 GMT -5
Congrats Madi! Well deserved!
|
|
|
Post by donut on Oct 21, 2019 19:59:20 GMT -5
I think you will see Haley inserted if Lexi or Madi are having a rough time in the back court. The problem with inserting Haley is that you lose the threat of a back-row attack on certain rotations, and I think right now the Huskers need all the offensive threats they can muster. Once Nicklin is able to get the Middles established consistently, I think we'll see more of Haley. this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. Also, again not promoting their usefulness, but since you love this stat so much, why don't you go look at Densbergers numbers from last year in the service reception error department? Hint: it was the worst on the team amongst primary passers, it was/is slightly worse than Sun's service reception error % this year, and about 40 points worse than Sun's service reception error % from last year. Densberger isn't the answer.
|
|
|
Post by Kingsley on Oct 21, 2019 20:52:35 GMT -5
this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. Also, again not promoting their usefulness, but since you love this stat so much, why don't you go look at Densbergers numbers from last year in the service reception error department? Hint: it was the worst on the team amongst primary passers, it was/is slightly worse than Sun's service reception error % this year, and about 40 points worse than Sun's service reception error % from last year. Densberger isn't the answer. Cook is clearly pushing Nicklin to start running the BIC more often. She set that ball with about the same frequency against Maryland as she did in that match against Purdue. It is an anomaly to have pipe hitters as efficient as Foecke or Albrecht, but at this point the coaching staff is trying to open up the offense to prevent opposing blockers from camping out. That's been an obstacle for much of the year.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 21, 2019 20:56:51 GMT -5
i dont have numbers but having the BIQ is almost a better option than Callie swinging at this point.
Kubiks and Suns defense will be fine, they've improved a lot since the start of the season
|
|
|
Post by huskerrob on Oct 21, 2019 21:36:16 GMT -5
this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. lol at your random numbers that you just make up Are you accusing me of presenting it in any other way? I am pretty sure I made that context clear and didn't attempt to state it as a factual stat. Or are you having issues with my posting of my recollection? Wouldn't the conversation be progressed more by letting us know what the actual stats are rather than making hay of something openly declared as a guess? I essentially say I am guessing and you are essentially saying 'LOL you guessed'...what am I missing here?
|
|
|
Post by huskerrob on Oct 21, 2019 22:34:56 GMT -5
this is probably a pretty true assessment. I don't know that the BIQ has been very successful, my own first impression is that it isn't used very often and when it is used, it secedes nearly 50% of the time with 20-30% being an error. I could be way off, as this is just an impression based on recall. Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. Also, again not promoting their usefulness, but since you love this stat so much, why don't you go look at Densbergers numbers from last year in the service reception error department? Hint: it was the worst on the team amongst primary passers, it was/is slightly worse than Sun's service reception error % this year, and about 40 points worse than Sun's service reception error % from last year. Densberger isn't the answer. just went back and watched the Purdue game again, 7 were set out of 134 attacks(5.2%), of which 3 were kills(42.9%), 3 were dug(42.9%) & 1 was blocked(14.3%).
|
|
|
Post by donut on Oct 21, 2019 22:45:15 GMT -5
Your recall must be pretty bad, because against Purdue, our second-to-most recent match, our BIC attack was probably the most successful it's been all season. Also, again not promoting their usefulness, but since you love this stat so much, why don't you go look at Densbergers numbers from last year in the service reception error department? Hint: it was the worst on the team amongst primary passers, it was/is slightly worse than Sun's service reception error % this year, and about 40 points worse than Sun's service reception error % from last year. Densberger isn't the answer. just went back and watched the Purdue game again, 7 were set out of 134 attacks(5.2%), of which 3 were kills(42.9%), 3 were dug(42.9%) & 1 was blocked(14.3%). Your point?
|
|
|
Post by des on Oct 21, 2019 22:48:33 GMT -5
i dont have numbers but having the BIQ is almost a better option than Callie swinging at this point. Kubiks and Suns defense will be fine, they've improved a lot since the start of the season This. They need the backrow hits because Callie is just not effective (as of the moment, whether it’s Hames or her own doing) offensively, yet.
|
|